Anybody want to cast the final close vote on this gem and let it fall into the waste bin of opinion-based questions? For some entertainment, read the comment stream after the answer. It's quite enjoyable.

@MattDMo I did that (if close vote means flagging the question). Man its longer than most of the answers here! Should I read that too? ;)

@another'Homosapien' unfortunately, flags do not equal close votes, but they can influence a mod to finally close it. The question is essentially content-free, although if you go through the edit history you'll find all sorts of interesting stuff. For example, the fact that until 3 hours ago, there weren't any scientific references supporting any of his claims.

And, until I edited it out yesterday, an admittance that most of it was written during a 40C fever. You can draw your own conclusions about that :)

The answer is good, short, and to the point. I wish it had more direct references, but it clearly refutes the (somewhat fuzzy) points the OP had made at the time. What makes it memorable is the tirade it kicks off, with the OP (I think, it's kind of unclear) claiming that he's one of the greatest scientists of all time, and he's being persecuted b/c of his brilliance, and b/c of that we're all attacking him and his theories. Or something. I really hope he doesn't delete any of his comments.

@MattDMo haha yeah the scientific community is not ready yet to accept such radical theories about such phenomena :D maybe he'd use mirror writing like da Vinci to show coming generations that he had discovered many futuristic theories much before the time ;)

I'm not blaming da Vinci :)

@another'Homosapien' I particularly liked how he claimed straight away that my downvote was because of some previous discussion on a question that I didn't even remember. Paranoia starts early.

General question - why are all these random things starred on the right? They're neither funny, nor interesting, nor particularly informative. Like upvoting newbies on the main site, someone does not understand how starring is supposed to work...

@MattDMo when I read that I thought it must have been a great fight

I don't know, I thought its the same as 'like' on fb

but it now seems more like bookmark

@another'Homosapien' it was in his mind, I suppose. I barely remembered it even when he reminded me.

@another'Homosapien' In the other SE/SO chatrooms I'm involved with, a star is used to tag items which match what I mentioned - they're funny, informative, or interesting. It's not a reward for answering a question or something, and there's already a bookmark capability.

@MattDMo yup. for a moment I actually thought that he is saying correct, but that doubt went away when I read further comments ;)

@MattDMo is there a way we can find out who has put a star?

@another'Homosapien' yeah, I can't wait for his next diatribe. I suppose we'll have to wait until he gets sick again.

@another'Homosapien' Not that I know of, but I have a few suspects in mind. You could probably figure it out pretty easily by reading the context of the starred statements.

@MattDMo looks like the second one's by @AlwaysConfused

@another'Homosapien' one of my suspects

@another'Homosapien' you're naughty!

@MattDMo everyone's gotta be! :P

@another'Homosapien' I've receIved a notification. Was it about my second question at chat?

@AlwaysConfused if you're on desktop (or desktop view) look at right side, you see messages with stars. Is any one of those stars yellow, or are all of them black?

@WYSIWYG I've posted a partially opinion based question on the main site. If you find some time can you take a look?