« first day (1430 days earlier)      last day (2119 days later) » 

IPS Comment Bot
IPS Comment Bot
09:34
If you want to know if there is any academic research about a topic then ask about the topic (here on IPS) and tag it with academic research. In my experience research studies about human behaviour rarely make up their own unique terminology that does not already exist in the English Language. — Jesse 1 min ago
#20022 Jesse (5375 rep) | Q: Is there an existing term for what I call "Verbal Cannonballs", which if avoided reduce conflict? (score: 1) | posted 5 hours ago by Jesse Steele (6 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by Jesse Steele (6 rep) | Toxicity 0.06419503 | tps/fps: 0/0
Matched regex(es) ["possible-aic"]
IPS Comment Bot
IPS Comment Bot
09:50
I don't have an answer to your question, but the problem is not at all limited to LGBT+ topics or crossdressing. People who haven't actually had contact to people with such a background but are not averse to the general idea are bount to get it wrong due to their lack of knowledge. It's not bad intention on their side and they aren't even aware of doing something wrong. — Elmy 1 min ago
#20019 Elmy (3174 rep) | Q: Untangling the intersections of transphobia, fetishization, and reality (score: 0) | posted 8 hours ago by apaul (47977 rep) | Toxicity 0.26279682 | tps/fps: 0/0
Matched regex(es) ["possible-aic"]
IPS Comment Bot
IPS Comment Bot
10:01
Just to be clear: do you want her to be your friend or your girlfriend? — Elmy 48 secs ago
#20027 Elmy (3174 rep) | Q: How can I gently question my friendship with someone who may or may not be my friend? (score: 0) | posted 1 hours ago by Greg (409 rep) | Toxicity 0.14665993 | tps/fps: 0/0
Matched regex(es) ["possible-aic"]
 
5 hours later…
IPS Comment Bot
IPS Comment Bot
14:53
I dont think you should try to show other people "the right way" because that is their own task. Your task is to talk about certain people the way you feel is right and not "untangle" other peoples views on reality. I would suggest that you do not play the "speech police" or "educator", but simply seperate what other people should do and what you should do. You can be irretated by what other people are doing and you can tell them that you are, but you shouldnt care so much that you would want to change them, which you can hardly do anyways. — stimulate 1 min ago
#20019 stimulate (241 rep) | Q: Untangling the intersections of transphobia, fetishization, and reality (score: -1) | posted 13 hours ago by apaul (47978 rep) | Toxicity 0.122788645 | tps/fps: 0/0
Matched regex(es) ["possible-aic"]
IPS Comment Bot
IPS Comment Bot
15:22
@user2921 No, English does not have two choices. It also has "it" and "them". — Carl Masens 20 secs ago
#3226 Carl Masens (111 rep) | A: In an online conversation, is it okay to use "guys" to address everyone? (score: 0) | posted 447 days ago by Sean C. (27 rep) | Toxicity 0.18433745 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
Just because it's used as gender-neutral does not make it okay to use it as gender-neutral. — Carl Masens 1 min ago
#2809 Carl Masens (111 rep) | A: In an online conversation, is it okay to use "guys" to address everyone? (score: 13) | posted 452 days ago by HDE 226868 (7090 rep) | edited 452 days ago by HDE 226868 (7090 rep) | Toxicity 0.09184768 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/
This is offensive to many women (and other non-males) who recognise "guys" to mean "a group of men". — Carl Masens 2 mins ago
#2804 Carl Masens (111 rep) | A: In an online conversation, is it okay to use "guys" to address everyone? (score: 74) | posted 452 days ago by NVZ (9335 rep) | edited 452 days ago by NVZ (9335 rep) | Toxicity 0.33449456 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
Why is it perfectly okay? Please back your answer up with explanations and/or sources. — Carl Masens 18 secs ago
#2815 Carl Masens (111 rep) | A: In an online conversation, is it okay to use "guys" to address everyone? (score: 0) | posted 452 days ago by K Split X (256 rep) | edited 452 days ago by SQB (4330 rep) | Toxicity 0.065017745 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
Actually, the true perennial Australian alternative is the vulgar "oi c*nts". — Carl Masens 2 mins ago
#3056 Carl Masens (111 rep) | A: In an online conversation, is it okay to use "guys" to address everyone? (score: 0) | posted 450 days ago by mcalex (407 rep) | Toxicity 0.79203826 | High toxicity | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
Tinkeringbell
Tinkeringbell
16:22
← 28 messages moved from The Awkward Silence
 
7 hours later…
Hexacoordinate-C
Hexacoordinate-C
23:12
I'm currently trying to model a multitubular fixed bed to perform an "easy" Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. However, I'm getting some trouble as my model should be in mass fraction in function of the length of the reactor and for a reason, I don't find (after few hours... I feel I'm dumb) the results look to be in molar concentration.
If someone has some background in numerical method and in Python I would be glad to have some help
Here is my code pastebin.com/XHWqntZV
The rate of reaction is given by a law in mol_CO/(g_cobalt.s) which I transformed into mol_CO/(m3_reactor.s) knowing that the cata parameters are rho_cata = 950kg/m3 and 30% of cobalt
Then my dCOdz is calculated from the mass balance on a dz length of a tube and it should be in mass fraction. However when I print the values for CO for example the values are really high (around -0.35) calculated 100 times it makes a total variation of around -35 .... which can't be a mass fraction
And I don't understand why it's not a mass fraction as it should be thanks to my mass balance...
30% w/w in Cobalt*
user image
Here are my calculation on units. (mélange stands for mixture and réacteur for reactor)

« first day (1430 days earlier)      last day (2119 days later) »