What kind of measurement to we want to have on the site?
The most common ones are
1) the metric measurements (Liter, Meter, Celsius) that are commonly used in most of Europe.
2) the US-imperial measurements (Inch, Foot, Gallon, Fahrenheit) that are commonly used in the US (and some of them som...
It's a new year and I am about to start tackling removing old toys to make way for the new. I came to stack exchange looking for a site dedicated to home issues. The only sites I can think of that would tackle "clutter busting" is Lifehacks or Parenting. Am I on the right site? I've searched for ...
I have asked a question about a problem which is somehow sexually related and there was considerable downvoting of this question without comments explaining why this happens. The question itself is not sexually related, but the problem in it has sexual ration.
At the beginning I was thinking it...
@J.Musser I don't tend to leave moderation comments, could have a lot to do with it... Also I don't think the view counter is terribly accurate, I've been surprised to see a few profiles linked in meta discussions on other sites with only one view counted. So, if I viewed it and the person linking to it viewed it, how could it have only one view?
I don't like the idea of a challenge site -- some people would have fun, sure, but the site wouldn't be so useful, IMO
/ reading
something that I agree with, even if I didn't before:
Don't get so hung up on closing, @Zach. The big problem with that question isn't that it was possibly off-topic, it's that the answerer didn't offer a hack. Closing didn't prevent that... although a suitably hacky answer might've prevented it from being closed. That tells me we're putting the cart before the horse here: folks don't even agree on what sorts of answers are appropriate, so figuring out question scope is all over the map. If we can agree on what a good "lifehacky" answer looks like, the rest will follow. — Shog9 ♦yesterday
@ZachSaucier tbh, part of my confusion in reading up on recent Meta activity was the revisions to this answer -- IMO, you should have just posted a new answer first. What's done is done < shrug >
when someone pointed out that my first and second paragraph (after editing) were contradictory I just changed the first one which resulted in "no" turning into "yes"
....maybe one final edit to that answer, to indicate that while that post hasn't changed, your personal position on the matter did change, so that no one will unknowingly accuse you of hypocrisy ;-)