@ellisaba You suggested to split the answer. If you want, you can do it yourself.
But if you don§t want to, I can do it myself.
@ellisaba I am surprised that nobody raised any objection to this post, but I can imagine several reasons why somebody could object to the post like this on meta.
For example, the post like this is likely to be bumped a lot which might be disruptive.
It might concentrate attention of people to correcting typos, which is probably less important that many other things on the site.
Anyway, that§s probably not that important.
In any case, if you decide that you don't want to do it yourself, simply let me know and I will post two other answers. (And split the existing one into them.)
@MartinSleziak I have removed cateory, so there is a bit more space in the post.
@ellisaba You have added as one of the words "Minkoswky". This word has no occurrences anywhere: search, SEDE.
@ellisaba I have split the answer into two - so in the answer listing the words there should be more space now.
Still, I think that we should be a more careful about what qualifies as common/frequent misspelling. (I am definitely guilty of including a few which probably shouldn't be in the list.)
@MartinSleziak "A natural splitting would be along the lines where the existing answer is already split (words/strings/phrases)." What does this has to do with the suggestion of splitting an answer in multiple answers? // I said that I wasn't sure what you meant because I thought that the modifications in your answer would be in your same answer, because you said along the lines where the existing answer already is
@MartinSleziak It's not that I didn't want to do it. I thought the best thing to do was to first consider your opinion, since it was your question, your answer, your idea
@ellisaba What I meant was that it could be split between "words" and "others" in two separate answers - at it is know.
We could split it even more.
We could add separate answer with names of mathematicians and this answer could be left with only words.
If needed, the other answer could be split - one answer for strings, one answer for prhases.
Re: your question, your answer, your idea. Well, the question and the answers are community wiki. (Whether or not it was a good idea, we will see - but so far nobody had some strong objections.)
A way to save a bit of space would be some changes in format of the entries.
