@JoãoAiresdeMatos If you right click the error in Visual Studio, there should be an option to copy the message as text. Providing the error message as text makes it a lot easier for others to search.

Some other information would also be helpful: were you ever able to compile the source before? Knowing if this happened from the very beginning or if it was working & suddenly broke might suggest a different problem/solutions.

^ re-uploaded for those on mobile

Thanks!

You're welcome! Unfortunately I didn't find much on it beyond an SO post on how error CS0433 can happen in ASP.Net stuff. Not sure if there's a similar thing going on here or not.

Looks like an "old" plugin project. I'd say it's probably a mess up between older MS stuff and newer Unity version.

I have an issue with my code for a long while, I dont understand why it happens, I am suppose to be implementing dual contouring to generate terrain, with directX, everything is working fine, terrain is generated and it works fine at certain dimension, but if i change it everything is messed UP

the only difference is I change the size of the terrain

I am uploading the code

I am not sure whether its bug in my code or the bug is caused by directX

the code in create cube grid drive.google.com/file/d/1o9cmYfOUkuugcOlv31pYBNk8MFA1MD8P/…

when I use CreateCubeGrid(32,32,32) i get the first image and the second when CreateCubeGrid(25,25,25)

ok

github.com/fido9dido/… Uploaded it to github.

I fixed irrelevant issue with the loop, in github, yet the issue still persistent. the code works with the following values in any order (32, 15, 32),(32,32,15)(15,32,32) adding +2 to x,y or z causes it to collapse

yes you are right, I was testing it, i though i was going out of boundaries so i reduced it to see will it help

because I am working with flat array, yet in any case it, this reduce the terrain size, it doesnt cause the collapse

nope, to my understanding my idea is to made the second loop to check the signed edges and then to set the boolean signedEdges to true then in the third loop based on signed edges from the second loop we create index buffer

and the vertices of the terrain are created in the second loop as well

so to fix my shitty grammar, the second loop's job is to create terrain vertices and indicate that a cube has signed edges, the third loop create index buffer based on signed edges from second loop.

I found it, it was an issue with directx

I was using unsigned int16 and passing it more than it's capacity, so it worked by changing index format DXGI_FORMAT_R32_UINT

I love how it didn't flag any error and caused semantic error

You can turn on narrowing conversion warnings, but they tend to be very noisy.

Yeah thanks I have been trying to know what was wrong for a week it was making me go crazy

How can I upload files here

What is it that you want to share?

I have been looking at RVO but it looks a bit too complex to implement in a few days, and I can't use the C# version of the library because that only works in 2D. Is there any other algorithm I can use for collision avoidance?

Yes, you can use any algorithm you get as a hit when you search "collision avoidance".

We won't forbid you from trying any of them. 😉

Hmm apparently SCII doesn't use RVO. But that might be because the algorithm is relatively new

I wanted to share an error message so you can help me

I am trying to build a game in UWP for xbox, but when I do I don't get achivements, I tried this plugin github.com/microsoft/xbox-live-unity-plugin but when I import it gives me errors, live both types exist

@Pikalek this image

Did you try qualifying the name to ensure the compiler knows which one you meant?

How can I qualify the name?

I can't using static UnityEngine.CoreModules

There's an example on this documentation page showing how you can designate which assembly to load a particular type or namespace from.

@Tyyppi_77 Yes, you are correct, there's a 100 rep requirement to upload images in chat: privileges/chat-rooms

@JoãoAiresdeMatos Based on the issues thread for the project, there are reports of problems w/ more recent versions of Unity & concerns as to if the project is dead or not.

In particular, someone else posted the same CS0433 errors you encountered.

Hey guys, I've tried using the GDK Sample to unlock a achievement, it works but how can I check on the xbox store or on the partner microsoft if the achievement was unlocked?

@JoãoAiresdeMatos Xbox Live test accounts

@doppelgreener Hey I have a cross stack thing I wanted to run past you.

o/

shoot!

I noticed that on RPG meta, y'all have a pretty regular yearly "How is the community doing?" post. As someone who hangs out here as well, do you think there'd be value in GDSE doing something like that?

We've found it's been a really useful place to consolidate issues we're struggling with, either in terms of quality issues, more specific content issues, meta difficulties, etc. The mod team started doing it a couple of years after some significant turmoil, and some attacks on our communities had just happened.

I think it's been very helpful for us, even if it's just to confirm there's not much that's an issue.

I know GDSE has issues it faces too. It gives people a space to air "hey, this is an issue" even when there's nothing further that can really be said or done about it, which usually isn't something you have a space for on a site meta.

it's prompted conversations, and sometimes those conversations have spawned things that might not have happened otherwise

That's helpful context, I appreciate you sharing.

You're welcome :)

Good notes. I'll flag this in the mod chat too. 😀

that said, we haven't had one yet where there haven't been positives and grievances and issues raised. and it's been helpful every time. :D

so "not much that's an issue" is more a theoretical scenario lol

but yeah, there's "we're doing too much D&D" "i'm getting fed up with this specific kind of question" "we're doing this thing better than we're used to!" "this space needs work" "this thing is doing pretty well and staying steady"

Understandable. Probably good even - if everything surfaced was full on crisis, that'd probably be a pretty bad situation.

Again, thanks for taking time to share your experiences on the matter. I going to let this all marinate for a bit & will then likely pitch the idea to GDSE Meta.

i might even have something to add to it if it gets posted!