« first day (1686 days earlier)      last day (3630 days later) » 

18:17
Liking the customizability of Android Studio. Of course, it's based on IntelliJ, so what else would we expect?
I was just disappointed they used the same shitty emulator program. I knew they would, but it was still disappointing, lol.
hopefully VS2015 has something nicer. I haven't tried the preview yet.
it wanted to install some emulator that I'd have to change BIOS settings for
@Almo hardware virtualisation probably
yeah that
that's a good thing
18:23
I can't do it though
I doubt IT would let me mess with the BIOS
that would be a really good thing. I don't remember seeing that option or I would've tried it.
that's probably true though
stupid work environments
@Almo why on earth not?
you missed it last night Icy... 1/13 Blitzcrank. Team went 42/44 despite me sucking horribly, but we lost anyway.
I don't play that badly that often
18:24
this just popped up on steam
lol I played one league match last night and watched a wukong and vlad both go mid and just trade kills with each other every time they got back to lane
heh
at 15 minutes wukong was 4/4 and vlad 3/4 and both had like 25 cs
hahaha
> suffice it to say this game is like a ragged pair of boxer-briefs to me now (in a good way)
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
@OMGtechy great minds think alike
example = function (a, b)
    return a + b;
I translated it to my language :P
ahaha
indeed they do ;)
how's that come along?
It's actually working somewhat
I've got the C interface mostly working and the core data types, so I've managed to pop open an OpenGL window and clear it with color :D
But the compiler spits out shitty fallback code for 99% of everything, where it just relies on the dynamic runtime to sort out the weak types when the compiler really should have caught it during the trace
18:48
ah, yours is (relatively) weakly typed?
One of the strong types is the "weak" type :P
aha whut xD
What does that even mean
@OMGtechy I have a datatype called var which can effectively be a string, number, array, map, function, or class. And a datatype called ref which is basically a smart pointer.
It handles a lot like javascript with that
what's the point of having an IDE if I have to edit arcane build scripts to include a library that I'm making
18:52
@MickLH ah. So it's dynamically typed?
@Almo What IDE is that?
latest Android Studio
@OMGtechy Actually that's the really weird part. it really is strongly typed
@MickLH Python style?
18:53
But, if you access an undefined variable, it's implicitly defined as "var"
Been a few years since I worked with that. But I didn't find it particularly enjoyable. I think working with Visual Studio has made me picky.
@OMGtechy How specifically should I compare / contrast?
between VS and Xcode, it's hard for me to use other IDEs.
PHPStorm is pretty good as far as PHP goes though
I've never been able to enjoy using PHP.
I think it's in large part because typing $ is an awkward 2-3 key combo.
@MickLH in Python, types aren't coerced, but they are inferred and can change by reassignment
18:55
It's funny how little things like that can be so annoying.
@OMGtechy Then yes it's very similar, except that types are always coerced
So not similar at all then :P
more like Javascript than Python it seems
But that only really shows up if you use strong types
"example" + 4 # TypeError in Python 3.4
If you never "use" strong types, then everything ends up being a var, which appears to change type when you coerce it around
18:57
can I see / use this language anywhere?
so: "example" + 4 == "example4", but 4 + "example" == 4 (and a warning in the debugger)
Yup, JavaScript style
@OMGtechy If you really have some kind of burning desire, I could upload code immediately. That would be embarrassing but it technically isn't broken beyond use completely right now.
4 + example in c# would result in "4example"
The way it should. :P
18:59
wierd how different languages handle that stuff
@Wardy I'd say "error" personally :P
string(4) + "example"
more explicit imo
@MickLH just go for it :D
PEMDAS taught us that the order of + doesn't matter. :P

« first day (1686 days earlier)      last day (3630 days later) »