« first day (4808 days earlier)      last day (495 days later) » 

User1865345
User1865345
12:16
Comment worth mentioning:
In hindsight I was giving ChatGPT too much credit here, it cannot make stuff up. It rather combines word tokens stochastically using statistical patterns it learned from reading who knows what, but has no semantic understanding whatsoever. — PBulls 2 days ago
whuber
whuber
13:06
@User1865345 What is interesting about that comment lies in how it implicitly denies the value of the Turing Test. Or, to put it another way: how does one test "semantic understanding," and distinguish it from mere verisimilitude, in a setting where all communication is mediated through language?
User1865345
User1865345
True it is.
To that, I recently came across this article: ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI
Haven't able to read it though.
 
3 hours later…
Stephan Kolassa
Stephan Kolassa
16:38
My naive understanding of the Turing Test is that it would heavily depend on the interlocutor. It might be easier to fool a 10-year-old than an adult.
 
1 hour later…
Stephan Kolassa
Stephan Kolassa
18:00
Fair coins are biased: arxiv.org/abs/2310.04153

« first day (4808 days earlier)      last day (495 days later) »