The Screening Room

steelerfan

11:00

@NapoleonWilson Is Capy being a bad influence on you? Staying awake for hours on end and then crashing?

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan No, I've done such things before for work stuff.

And I'm not posting crazy taco and animal gifs yet, am I?

steelerfan

Ha!! You're right! All of that was done over in Mos Eisley the moment he came back.

What are you doing in here this time of the day?

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan Oh, I love Labyrinth, own it on DVD, it's just amazing!

steelerfan

11:17

@NapoleonWilson Love that movie. Love David Bowie.

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan Me? This time of the day? The same I always do, chatting, while drinking my noon wake-up coffee.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson I never usually see you in here right now. It is 3:20 am here. Ankit is usually the only one in here at this time when I am working overnight shifts.

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan Well, it's a bit early for weekend, I guess. I rarely get up before 13:00 on the weekend. And if I do, it's because I gotta lunch externally.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson I hear ya. I will be sleeping until about 5-6 pm when I get off work :)

Napoleon Wilson

@Walt I might have a guess who it is, but I might also be wrong. Haven't read the latest weekend flood yet.

@steelerfan Normally such articles are to be included. But if the tag name is too long, they're the best candidates for shortening.

steelerfan

11:34

@NapoleonWilson Yeah, Walt was kind enough to explain that to me :)

Napoleon Wilson

@Walt I think you can blow this by simply using a multiline chat message (in which case it will just hide the rest behind a "read more" click option).

@steelerfan Well, I made the mistake to register with my real name and photo on SE anyway.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson Oh, sorry I missed your pic :( You could have shared in all of the fun we were having earlier :)

Ankit Sharma

I am unhappily working this weekend and its 5:00 P.M.

Now i might even cry and ask for a weekday off :D

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan What do you mean miss? Anyway, if it wasn't for the botched SE chat parent site system I'd probably go by my real name in chat anyway.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson What? I have never seen your real pic. Am I going mad?

Napoleon Wilson

11:43

@steelerfan Well, it's practically on every SE account except for the entertainment/arts related things, for which I just use my favourite characters.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson Alright, if you're going to make me work for it and go check it out for myself :)

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan Duh, just click on my top-rep account, which is SO. ;-P

If you want me to spam chat with my likeness, that's unlike(ness)ly to happen.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson OMG!! You are so handsome :)

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan Wow, thank you. <blushing emoticon>

steelerfan

You guys are all so adorable.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

11:46

@steelerfan That's what the maniacs in the movies say, right?

steelerfan

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Sure. the female "maniacs" :)

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson Oh huh, you're the christ tau guy.

@NapoleonWilson Famous? I'm honored. :)

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. I thought I'd seen that event regularly be advertized in the chat events list. Or was it rather one-shot? Maybe I remember other similar events then.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson What do you mean? Events don't get advertised. Can you give me a screenshot?

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. I just meant the list of chat events, maybe "advertized" was too much.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

11:55

@NapoleonWilson Ahh. Then take a look at this and find out:

15

Q: The Great Retagging Event - Episode 1: The one-taggers

TRE will be held at $\ldots$? Famous final words The Retagging Event (TRE) What good is in working so much on cleaning tags if they're not applied to questions? I thought, we should do something extraordinary. Oh no Rationale Editing questions bumps them up; and so...

Ankit Sharma

I am happy we didn't started showing of pictures here.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

There are also links to chat logs in which the TRE happened.

steelerfan

@AnkitSharma Why? You have shown me your pic before.

Ankit Sharma

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. did you changed you name recently?

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Yeah, I will.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

11:56

@AnkitSharma Define recently Ankit.

Ankit Sharma

@steelerfan that didn't had my face ;D I think i have used my real pic here many times and stupid area 51 still have my old real picture

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. is that name started with "i" was u?

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. So bluntly, are you that M.A.Ramezani(?) guy from ELL?

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@AnkitSharma Yep.

@NapoleonWilson Yes. Did I do something?

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. No, just out of curiosity and to bring names in relation to people.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

Good. For a moment I thought . . .

steelerfan

11:58

@AnkitSharma Oh, stop. Everyone is friendly here. Of course, please don't feel obligated to. We were all just messing around earlier :)

Ankit Sharma

Hmmmm

steelerfan

You guys just wait until after my Steelers game. I will be FLOODING you all with pictures :)

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan "We were all just messing around earlier" - I see, that's how you hold it with the sincerity of your compliments.

@steelerfan You got to tell me where you're actually seated in that.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson I was actually referring to the goofballs in Mos Eisley when they were posting all of their pics. I am very sincere when I give a compliment :)

@NapoleonWilson I believe it is around the 20 yard line. My brother in law has the tickets. I will let you know before I leave.

@AnkitSharma You are too hard on yourself. Good picture. Adorable :)

Ankit Sharma

12:14

@steelerfan ohhh....really. :)

steelerfan

You guys are all adorable.

Even the goofballs in Mos Eisley.

Ankit Sharma

@steelerfan I think only two of them shared there pic

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson knows he is my #1 though :)

@AnkitSharma Wad, N_Soong, Phantom42, Candied Mango all shared.

Ankit Sharma

k......maybe i need to get back to trail more

Later maybe, after office

I aslo need to check many questions from here

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan I have doubts if N_Soong really looks like Brent Spiner, though. ;-)

steelerfan

12:20

@NapoleonWilson OMG! I was believing that was him! Dammit, he tricked me!! I have no clue who that would be. I have my blonde moments some times. Don't mind me....

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan Well, I guess it's simply your lack of Star Trek knowledge showing (which isn't necessarily a bad thing), given that he wasn't really in anything else since then (apart from Independence Day) and when he was it was usually to capitalize on his Star Trek fame.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson I actually thought that he was serious when he said that his real pic was his avatar. I know exactly who you are talking about now. He is the old "crazy" Doctor that works at Area 51. Dammit N_Soong!!

I was wondering why he kept dropping hints about TV shows. God, I am such an idiot!!

Movie Reel

12:58

0

Q: Movie with one (child) twin kidnapped and sold to a wealthy family. Reunited in later life

The film starts off with two twins sitting or playing in a yard and a guy reaches over the fence, grabs one of the boys and sells him to a wealthy family. Later on, the kid realize he's friends with his own twin brother. At the end of the film, the stolen twin leaves his biological mother a no...

identify-this-movie

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan Well, I'm pretty sure I know who it is and this person should already know how detrimental it is to the site (not that I think he'd care about that anyway).

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson Well, you would have more inside information than I would. I would have no clue who it would be. I do know what Walt is talking about after I actually had time to look at all of the questions from the past 3-4 days.

Napoleon Wilson

@steelerfan I don't have more inside information about votes, it's just a pattern that shows, combined with prejudice and guessing from my side.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@Walt Actually, this is the biggest problem of your site now. Yes, the biggest.

Crap getting upvoted and answered is the worst disease of a growing SE site.

2

Proof: Look at trash.SE (AKA math.SE)

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. ID has always been the biggest problem of this site. But sure, even upvoting the shit it doesn't actually help.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

13:03

I have a sharp eye on them, but it's your and @Nap's duty to look and write some dramatic meta in order to call people off.

steelerfan

@NapoleonWilson Well, that's too bad. Maybe there should be some sort of prerequisite of IQ level before voting? ;)

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Well, we've tried it, but maybe the meta hasn't been serious enough yet. But unfortunately meta activity is another problem. ;-(

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson Depends on how we define 'problem'. ID in movies is like HW questions in chem.SE. There isn't a real and good reason to ban them once and for all, and allowing them draws way more traffic to the site.

steelerfan

@AnkitSharma You changed your Avatar pic!! You're awesome!! :))

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson Poor guys. .__. At least we have an active meta.chem. (Or I think it's that way)

The best thing I like about chem is that people decide something and then abide by it.

Meta posts work, not just come and go.

Napoleon Wilson

13:05

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Yeah, but what traffic? Most of those users are never ever coming back at all, let alone to contribute non-ID stuff. And the questions are simply distorting the brand of what the site is about, leading to an actual exodus of great users.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson They do ask questions.

Buffybot

Perhaps rather than relying on downvotes, you could (as mod), ask the community to define a set of minimum standards for Ident questions, then simply close anything that fails to meet those standards.

That would obviously require a meta.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@Buffybot This is the way.

Buffybot

Downvotes are a very unpleasant way for people to work out that they're doing wrong.

Napoleon Wilson

@Buffybot That minimum standard exists, though. If people disregard it when deciding to upvote is a different question, though. But ok, maybe we just have to be clearer.

Buffybot

13:13

Whereas force-closing it, with a link to the standards in the comments is much more pleasant for new users

Napoleon Wilson

@Buffybot Granted.

@Buffybot Mere sympathy upvotes for crap aren't great either, though.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson Do you have a post titled "How do I ask ID questions in movies.SE?"?

Buffybot

As a minimum you need to define "answerable" much more closely. I've seen questions that are answered being described as unanswerable.

e.g. Which they clearly aren't. QED

Napoleon Wilson

@Buffybot Granted, that sure needs rewording, it's about "effort" more than "answerability".

Buffybot

@NapoleonWilson - A poorly worded close is liable to lead to bad feelings.

Ankit Sharma

13:15

@steelerfan You inspired me and this pic is atleast not that old

steelerfan

@AnkitSharma awwww, glad I could inspire you :)

Walt

@Buffybot It's here under Identify-This-X Questions, though, granted, it's not the most visible location for it.

And 'unanswerable' is indeed poorly phrased IMO. I think I told the Mods this already.

Napoleon Wilson

@Walt On the other hand, people who don't read the help center won't search meta either.

@Walt Indeed you did.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@Walt Not poorly phrased, but general and vague. Everything general and vague fails in practice.

Walt

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Sure.

Napoleon Wilson

13:20

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Unfortunately it's hard to give clear and strict guidelines on it, though, sicne they don't really exist. You need to mention at least a decade accurate timeframe and a continent-accurate production country? If that fails, how much can more time accuracy make up for lacking country accuracy. And how much can more story accurary make up for lacking meta accuracy?

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

Guys! You should have strict set of rules, so when you faced an ID question, you could easily and clearly say "this doesn't do X as mentioned in the ID policy, VTC."

@NapoleonWilson Maybe require at least 3 criteria from, like, the 7 criteria that usually get mentioned?

So any post that has 3 specifications remains open. Otherwise, -1, VTC.

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. But then what. What about a crappy non-descript 2-liner that actually gives that meta information but still lacks significant detail/effort at a whole?

Buffybot

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. - I like this idea. "VTC as this post doesn't meet at least 3 of the 7 accepted criteria for an ID question"

1) Genre

2) Whether it's a Movie/Documentary/TV serial, etc

3) Likely year of production (or at least decade)

Walt

@NapoleonWilson I don't even care anymore if people say they're not sure what country or year it's from if they just say it, because it showed they at least tried.

Buffybot

4) Any stars or cast they can recall

Napoleon Wilson

13:24

@Walt Indeed, it's about friggin' effort and has always been. Unfortunately, though, that's also less clear to measure.

Buffybot

5) Likely Country of origin

and two more

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson The only thing you can do to lack of effort is -1, unless you require minimal effort, as we require in our homework policy.

And still, save your breath for the edge cases.

You're resolving the main cases. That's an improvement.

Napoleon Wilson

And I'm happy to reopen a closed ID question when someone actually added new substantial information (how rarely that may happen), even if it isn't actually adding an additional one of the 7 information categories. As the close then actually served its pedagogical purpose.

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. But the main cases do largely work. Crap is closed and downvoted and good stuff stays open and gets upvoted.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson And that includes what percent of the questions?

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Pff, don't know. Questions.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

13:31

ಠ_ಠ

Movie Reel

1

Q: querky comedy in english language

british film (english, irish, scottish, welsh?) -- in color some sort of 1 word clerical or scholarly reference in a 3-4 word title (apostate, cleric's, petitioner???) in beginning wealthy, older man meets with his confidential friend and a nephew? -- they talk of shifting or transferring iden...

identify-this-movie

0

Q: Watching Star Vijay online in India

Does anyone know how to watch Star Vijay online? I have tried using Kodi. I can view all other channels but not Star Vijay.

reality-tv

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@MovieReel O__o

Napoleon Wilson

@all That being said, your input is appreciated and we'll try to think about it.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

OK, take this into account that since you don't have stats, your intuition may be lying to you @Walt @Nap. The extreme cases -- the odd ones -- are the ones that get the most attention and frustrate the most. So what if you're whining for no good reason? Humans tend to over-exaggerate stuff.

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. I thought you mean the percentage of questions that are edge cases when you asked about percentage. No, the actually crapp questions (that are not edge case or good ones) are a big majority.

Walt

13:36

@NapoleonWilson Some improve, though. (After prompting, usually)

Napoleon Wilson

Neither do I feel being concerned about the future of this site devolving into a lair of crap nobody cares about as exaggerating more than being genuinely worried. But I also admit that many users can afford the luxury of not having to worry about the site's future in that way.

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

@NapoleonWilson A lot of crap isn't un-salvageable. A lot of crapped that's being received with an answer or an upvote is, though.

Walt

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Yeah, that's what I was whining about, really. (Well, today, anyway.)

Napoleon Wilson

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Well, the problem is that for any question category other than ID you don't necessarily need the actual asker to salvage the question on a fundamental level.

Walt

@NapoleonWilson Dunno about that. A lot of questions need clarifications.

Napoleon Wilson

13:41

@Walt But mostly the rough idea is recognizable, though.

Walt

@NapoleonWilson Yeah, I guess

Buffybot

13:52

@NapoleonWilson "Story about a world where humans are living in some sort of virtual reality environment. Had Keanu Reeves in it" = 2 out of 7 criteria but instantly recognisable.

Napoleon Wilson

@Buffybot And awful shit, so...?

Buffybot

"Indian language Bollywood film made in the 1990s, starred Adoor Bhasi About a man who has issues with his wife" = meets 6 out of 7 criteria just from the title but is totally unanswerable.

Napoleon Wilson

@Buffybot And shows equally less effort, so...?

Buffybot

@NapoleonWilson - There's no "so", I'm just pointing stuff out.

rand al'thor

@Buffybot @Richard Love the new profile on SFF! :-)

Napoleon Wilson

13:55

@Buffybot Ah, ok. Then yeah, I agree with your point that simply meeting those X out of X info points is not really enough to measure quality.

Buffybot

For the record, I'm largely on your side. Bad/unanswerable ID questions should be closed. But they should be closed by you, not reliant on downvotes from the community

rand al'thor

Are you on strike from answering over there, or just from editing/flagging/reviewing?

Buffybot

@randal'thor - Glad you approve

@randal'thor - Still deciding.

Napoleon Wilson

@Buffybot Sure, but it doesn't help when the community is divided on things and upvotes bad questions that then provide the wrong impression of what the site is supposed to be. (Not saying this is entirely the upvoters' fault.)

Buffybot

@NapoleonWilson - Hence the need for a powerful meta question that can be referred to

Perhaps schedule a chat event to encourage people to thrash it out.

steelerfan

13:56

What? @Buffybot is Richard? Jesus Christ I am losing it right now!

Buffybot

"Hello. I'm Buffybot. I'm a chatbot operated by @Richard on SFF:SE. If I'm acting weird, it's his fault. Go yell at him."

chat.stackexchange.com/users/166451#

Napoleon Wilson

@randal'thor He's apparently not on strike from chatting at least. ;-)

Buffybot

@NapoleonWilson - I presume I'm welcome to chat here under my alter ego.

Given that you have at least one active member/chatter who's had their account destroyed on SFF:SE

rand al'thor

@NapoleonWilson Not on M&TV at least.

Buffybot

@randal'thor - I am banned from Mos Eisley for the next 87 days.

Napoleon Wilson

13:58

@Buffybot Well, by me personally? Sure, or at least as welcome as Richard was. ;-P But frankly I'm not so sure about SE, since it isn't an indirect chat-ban due to parent site suspension but an actual chat suspension.

steelerfan

@Buffybot So, did you hear that BENGALS LOST!!!! :))

Buffybot

@steelerfan - How did the Steelers do?

Napoleon Wilson

@Buffybot Yeah, and he 's chat-banned, but didn't circumvent the chat-ban yet. (And is a great contributor on the site in general.)

steelerfan

@Buffybot THEY WON!!

Buffybot

@steelerfan - Boo!

rand al'thor

14:00

@Buffybot From the whole of SFF chat (at least), if I understand correctly how chat suspensions work.

Buffybot

@randal'thor - I am happy to be led by @NapoleonWilson or any other mods/CMs who happen to be in the vicinity. My understanding is that my chat ban applies to my @richard account on SFF and specifically to Mos Eisley rather than any other accounts that I operate.

Napoleon Wilson

@randal'thor This is where I'm unsure. It is actually a chat suspension from the entirety of SE's chat and you're not supposed to do anything with a sockpuppet that you ucan't do with a single account.

steelerfan

I can't take all of these aliases!!!!

Buffybot

@NapoleonWilson - Please ask on my behalf. In the meantime I shall resume lurking.

rand al'thor

@NapoleonWilson Hence my "(at least)". You're the mod though - you tell us!

@steelerfan Richard = Buffybot, Wad Cheber = Capy Stenchbeast, cde = Passerby ... that's all I can think of right now.

Napoleon Wilson

14:02

@Buffybot I will do so. (And let it be known, that apart from our obvious differences this isn't me trying to bully you out of chat, your constructive ID isnights today are appreciated.)

steelerfan

@randal'thor My head is literally going to explode.

rand al'thor

@steelerfan Make sure you have a mango seed ready to plant then!

(inter-chatroom jokes :-D )

steelerfan

@randal'thor HA HA. Mango cracks me up :)

Movie Reel

0

Q: Why is the child disclaimer incomplete?

The third season of Masters of Sex has a disclaimer that ends by telling us ... the children Tessa, Henry, Johnny, and Jenny are fictional. Thing is, Masters has 3 children in this season. I don't know the name or gender of the third, but there have been several scenes in which it is clearl...

masters-of-sex

Napoleon Wilson

14:32

@Buffybot It seems you are indeed not supposed to chat on @Richard's behalf anywhere on the whole of SE's chat network.

steelerfan

14:53

Ugh. I'm sick of Christmas music ALREADY!!!

Ankit Sharma

@steelerfan its only November.

steelerfan

@AnkitSharma EXACTLY!! They have this damn station on at work that is playing non-stop Christmas music. It's driving me crazy!!!

Ankit Sharma

Anyways i am just busy in cursing people in my heart for killing my weekend

And missed all that ID discussion and didn't put input either

steelerfan

@AnkitSharma I'm sorry :(

@AnkitSharma I wasn't even getting into that :)

Ankit Sharma

@NapoleonWilson i don't mind if something like 3 out of 7 essential info for ID rule passed.

Napoleon Wilson

14:59

@AnkitSharma I explained my arguments why that IMHO fails as a good criterium.

steelerfan

3 more hours to go.... :)

Ankit Sharma

@NapoleonWilson i need to read whole transcript , as i have read fucking 100+ question.

@steelerfan shift end?

steelerfan

@AnkitSharma Yes!!!

Ankit Sharma

Great

I might even break someones head before leaving office or my own

steelerfan

I am working a double shift. I don't get out of here for 3 more hours.

I believe I will only break my own head. I cannot break anyone else's here ;)

Ankit Sharma

15:12

Last night after office i had office party and there i have to drop a colleague (which i hate the most) to his home because he is too drunk too even walk on his own. And now after all that with 4 hour sleep i am working on weekend.

And this same guy is responsible for this weekend work.

rand al'thor

15:29

@NapoleonWilson Except meta chat, I assume? Since chat.meta.SE is a whole different system from chat.SE.

Napoleon Wilson

@randal'thor Indeed, as is SO's chat.

rand al'thor

@Richard If you want, you could set up a meta chatroom for your fans to come and chat to you ;-)

steelerfan

15:51

@AnkitSharma awwwww, I am sorry. At least you were nice enough to drive him home :)

Napoleon Wilson

12 messages deleted

steelerfan

alrighty then :)

On that note, I am outta here.

Wad Cheber

16:23

Woah. What'd I miss?

Napoleon Wilson

@WadCheber Nothing, apparently. ;-P

(Seriously though, it was nothing serious, just a rehashing about a user's chat suspension over and over again that didn't seem to add anything. It was not at any negative severity levels at all, but simply felt unnecessary. And I'd rather uphold a philosophy of not discussing user suspensions and their reasons to death, as might be known to be a problem from other chatrooms.)

Wad Cheber

Very sensible.

Napoleon Wilson

I left the parts of the conversation that bear actual information value, though.

Wad Cheber

17:00

Do we know if @Richard set up such a room?

Napoleon Wilson

No.

Wad Cheber

"Weird Al" Yankovich is a movie psychic: "But I know that I'll be coming back someday, I'll be playing this part till I'm old and grey. The long term contract I had to sign says I'll be making these movies till the end of time, with my Yoda"

5 billion points to anyone who can name this movie without google image reverse search:

Movie Reel

17:38

0

Q: Have there ever been considerations about releasing the actual movie whose production The Act of Killing documents?

Joshua Oppenheimer's documentary The Act of Killing observes original perpetrators of the 1965 Indonesian anti-communist purge reenact their killings in the form of movie scenes in whatever cinematic genres they choose, resulting in a wide range of disturbing movie scenes growing in surrealism. H...

the-act-of-killing

SQB

I keep reading "Capy" as "Captain".

Movie Reel

18:12

0

Q: Looking for old animated pegasus movie

Looking to find an old animated (2D) movie about a Pegasus. I distinctly remember that my mother used to check it out from the local public library for me to watch so it must have been in the early '90s, but the animation style looked like it could have been from much earlier. I don't remember ma...

identify-this-movie

Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.

19:15

@WadCheber Sausage man?

Oh no no. Lemme think.

The Salsa?

Wad Cheber

Hints: Cult classic. Brilliant soundtrack.

Movie Reel

21:32

-1

Q: Looking for great philosophical / life related films

this week I have seen Interstellar and it was an extremly beautiful experience. I'm not a person too much in touch with my feelings but this film went realy deep inside of me, making me cry as I have never cried before. The sci-fi scenario doesnt care to much in my opinion, but it does the myster...

interstellar

0

Q: i need help to find a movie!

movie is about two robbers something like bonnie and clyde,young man and his girlfriend robbing around,she is daughter of local sheriff,and i know on the end police surround the gas station and when they come out he takes out the chocolate stucked in his pants the police kills them both

identify-this-movie

Movie Reel

22:10

0

Q: movie about a guy going into a store and then pushes a row of domino's he then gets burned with acid

i watched a movie very long ago about a group of people that gets trapped in a small town. All i remember is a scene where the guy goes into the abandoned store then pushes over a row of domino's only it leading to a acid bottle and then gets burnt in his leg. i also remember a scene where the gi...

horror

0

Q: Name of a painting in Wall Street (1987)

I am looking for a name of the painting or artist featured in Bud's apartment. I tried to google the artists in credits but no luck.

product-placement

Walt

@MovieReel I'm gonna buy every single copy of Mindhunters and then rent them at 1,000$ a pop upon request. I'magonnabe a millionaire.

Walt

23:35

@MovieReel Should I answer this? Isn't it currently trivia?

Napoleon Wilson

@Walt One could ask what it contributes to the scene, though.

Walt

@NapoleonWilson I kinda did, in a comment

Or at least hinted at it

@NapoleonWilson In any case, brace yourself for Sunday :/ They're already trickling in

Napoleon Wilson

@Walt Fortunately I got a few more Star Trek questions to retag so I should be able to overspam 'em a bit.

Walt

@NapoleonWilson Hmm, Trek Q's or bad ID... it's a toughie

@NapoleonWilson Richard seems interested, at least. I'll put it up; if it's trivia, VTC

Napoleon Wilson

23:50

@Walt Meh, if the "trivia" votes come, we can still extend the question (whatever that'll do with your answer, though).

Transcript for