Is this a shopping list or not? AFAIC, a shopping-list is "which tool is best/great for..." - searching for the mere existence of a tool does not a shopping-list make, IMHO. Open to correction on this!
Paul White posted a site where you could make up tables for presentation on various sites - here and elsewhere - does anybody have the link? I'll be sure and bookmark it this time!
Also, another thing I was pondering last evening - I do a lot of pondering... there's a diagram showing the "phylogenetic tree" of the various RDBMS's out there - INGRESS normally being considered the granpops of them all and how the different systems came from that - PostgreSQL, Sybase, SQL Server... inter alia... anyone got a link to that as well?
These types of questions are harmful to the site and should be quickly closed and probably deleted.
I know that SO has a no-shopping-list questions policy, and this feels like a shopping-list.
It's not just SO, this has been established network wide for a long time. Just two meta.SE example...
Re. tables - thanks for that! I'm looking for jupyter R notebook markdown - is it one of the options or should I just go with HTML? R markdown isn't specifically in the dropdown for output style, but I'm not mad keen on HTML! Thanks again...
Re. shopping-list. The OP is asking about the existence of a tool for what she wants - not asking about (well, she did initially, but I've since edited) which is "best". That's a simple "yes and here it is..." or "Sorry, no, but no such tool exists...". The only problem I see is that a "no" answer could be rendered obsolete with the arrival of such a tool on the scene. However, this is also true of any number of features of <any_RDBMS> where an answer can be obsoleted by a new feature.
Anyway, it's not going to keep me up at night - if you feel it should be closed, then "go ahead punk, make my day!" :-)
@Vérace This is the problem. People see the word "tool" in a question and immediately think of closing the question as 'shopping list'. If I felt the question should be closed, it would be closed. I don't get to vote.
The question is about solving a particular problem. The asker mentions a tool in passing; it is not the core of the issue. There is a risk people will answer with their favourite tool, but that's only one possibility. Better answers would be based on expertise and experience in solving the core problem: database deployment and maintenance.
I only noticed that you edited it after I wrote the above - I explained my rationale to a list member who seems to want it closed. I'm going to leave it there. I suppose if dba.se is to be a "community", I have to accept that not everybody will think the way I do and live with that - or else take my toys and go home! :-)
Ingres Database ( ing-GRESS) is a proprietary SQL relational database management system intended to support large commercial and government applications.
Actian Corporation, which announced April 2018 that it is being acquired by HCL Technologies, controls the development of Ingres and makes certified binaries available for download, as well as providing worldwide support. There was an open source release of Ingres but it is no longer available for download from Actian. However, there is a version of the sourcecode still available on GitHub.In its early years, Ingres was an important milestone...
> PostgreSQL evolved from the Ingres project at the University of California, Berkeley. In 1982, the leader of the Ingres team, Michael Stonebraker, left Berkeley to make a proprietary version of Ingres.
@ypercubeᵀᴹ Damn, Paul White beat me to it! It's used in Revenue in Ireland (God alone knows why...) but they're moving to Oracle AFAIK! I compiled and ran it once on Linux - v. complex build process - there's still source code on GitHub somewhere - but AFAICS, PostgreSQL has it beaten hands-down on every level.
I think it's slowly dying - but is has left a huge legacy - PostgreSQL (and all of its commerical derivatives), Sybase, SQL Server, Informix... It was originally Michael Stonebraker's project - he recently contributed to Postgres Vision saying what he thinks PostgreSQL's development priorities should be.
But the "normally being considered the granpops of them all and how the different systems came from that", that is truly first time i hear it. And I seriously doubt it. Did really Sybase and SQL Server use source code from Ingres, even in the first versions?
@ypercubeᵀᴹ did you ever get a chance to tackle that tricky SQL we were looking at? I'm right out of time at the moment - I shouldn't be posting here really what with doing a Masters added to my other daily chores :-). I'd love to get to grips with it - maybe when term is over. I think it'll call for "hammock-driven development" (Rich Hickey - inventor of Clojure - a really clever guy).
> T-SQL does not provide us with a way to write a semi or anti join directly (though interestingly U-SQL does), so we have to use indirect syntax like this instead ...
but the title "JOIN (Databricks SQL)" is confusing. Does it apply to all Azure databases/products? Is there a separate Databricks product/tool where SEMI JOIN can be used?
Someone somewhere posted a link to a blog post someone wrote that they were leaving the MySQL development team and being critical about it. I can't find it now, does anyone know what it was? I'm not even sure it was posted here on chat.
@ypercubeᵀᴹ Thanks yeah that was it. I don't think I was on here that far back though, and pretty sure I saw it in the last month or so, so might have seen it somewhere else.
MySQL really does seem like a toy DBMS sometimes. Postgres just wipes the floor with it and it's also open-source. I thought of this blog today when I realized that MySQL doesn't do FULL JOIN, like, what??
It just doesn't seem to have a USP, it doesn't have a single feature I can see that other DBMSs don't have. Unless you count ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY 😡