« first day (3789 days earlier)      last day (1076 days later) » 

12:30 AM
fun with Postgres (bug?): dbfiddle.uk/…
 
 
4 hours later…
4:19 AM
So, we added an Azure Managed Instance to our topology. I was clicking around (as you do) and landed in the logs.
> Local computer is XXXXX running Windows NT 6.2 (9200)
Oooh kaaay. I think I'll not look in the logs any more.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:22 AM
Morning
 
 
5 hours later…
11:25 AM
morning
 
11:43 AM
Morning.
Can we do a user login via a ssl certificate in postgres? The key is to avoid having to have the username/password begin part of the application?
 
12:29 PM
2
Q: How to use SSL/TLS between server and client with Postgres?

Valter SilvaI don't know much with it comes to security. I'm deploying a virtual machine with my database in a cloud service. I would like to encrypt all the communication between this server and any clients. How can I do that ? More information: I have read a lot of material from postgres documentation [1,...

If that doesn't answer question, ask it on Database Administrators.
 
1:04 PM
good morning
YET ANOTHER MEETING TODAY OVER THE SAME DAMN THING
 
I'm sure the outcome will be different though
 
Like, I'm not sure how more clear I can be at this point?
 
1:36 PM
> - How does Cassandra work?
> - It is a global cluster.
> - A bit more detail?
> - It is a global cluster fuck.
 
1:48 PM
🤣
 
lol
"It's called Cassandra, because even if it gives you the right answer you won't believe it."
 
2:07 PM
CFDB - anyone?
 
I don't have room for Postgres on this laptop
 
2:37 PM
that meeting was absolute crap
"Why not Athena!" "Use Mongo!" "Snowflake!"
 
I miss the tweet oneboxes
 
2:54 PM
It's frustrating, because I'm not arguing against moving into the cloud on principle, I'm arguing against moving to cloud technologies that are large steps backwards in terms of functionality - especially WRT to data.
 
It can be a lot of effort to achieve less than nothing. Naturally, there are plenty of cases where it makes sense to put that effort in.
 
There's this persistent myth that the limiting factor in data is processing power and not I/O.
 
Sometimes I think people just want something new and cool to focus on
The old problems are too hard
 
We'd rather chase shiny things instead of fix the tech debt
 
Precisely
 
3:00 PM
so anyhoo going to polish off the old resume and stop working myself up trying to fight stupid people
 
3:14 PM
I slid the ol' silently looking button on LinkedIn a week or so back. It's been productive. Just need to figure out whether I want to continue working for someone else or try being an independent consultant fulltime
 
Oh I thought you were already fully independent
 
Market was getting dicey 2 years ago so I went FT and have been doing stuff on the side for people.
But my independent consulting career thus far is just sub-contracting under others as I'm a shit salesperson
and marketing and back office and pretty much everything that isn't the core work. So maybe the life of a sub is for me
But I like the freedom of having "unlimited" vacation, business deductions, self-direction on what problems I do/don't want to tackle
 
3:32 PM
yeah
 
Current gig has been interesting though. We offer insurance in the US and trades in the rest of the world based on weather probabilities. So I got to learn a bunch about geography and gis stuff like projection of a set of lat/long into different mappings spaces.
Home office will "randomly" reach out and say We're thinking about taking a position on the hours of sunlight for a farm in Hawke Bay. The quants then ping us saying "what data do we have/can we get to support this?"
 
That does sound cool
The dilemma you present is real
 
3:49 PM
I just need to become independently wealthy without doing anything to justify becoming so.
7
 
 
3 hours later…
6:56 PM
Plenty of examples of that in the world
 
I know, why did I have to be born to pedestrian middle class parents...
I started reading "Strangers on a Train" yesterday and Bruno perfectly expresses that desire.
Strangers on a Train (1950) is a psychological thriller novel by Patricia Highsmith about two men whose lives become entangled after one of them proposes they "trade" murders. It was adapted as a film in 1951 by director Alfred Hitchcock and again in 1969 by Robert Sparr. It has since been adapted in whole or in part for film and television several times. The novel was adapted for radio in 2004 by Craig Warner, and adapted for the stage in 2013 (also by Warner). == Plot summary == Architect Guy Haines wants to divorce his unfaithful wife, Miriam, in order to marry the woman he loves, Anne Faulkner...
Hadn't seen the film but was aware of it and then read "Eight Perfect Murders" earlier this year so I thought I should look at some of the source material
 
 
2 hours later…
8:55 PM
If one can read about 8 "perfect" murders, were they really "perfect"?
one would expect that perfect would mean no one would know, and hence no one could write about them.
But perhaps I'm simply being pedantic.
 
9:08 PM
Or you've exactly described the premise of 8 Perfect Murders
 
Is that book a documentary of real-life events or a work of fiction?
 
@HannahVernon Depends on your perfection criteria. Some clearly are meant to be well known, like these ones for example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
 
@mustaccio good point
 
9:41 PM
Ah. "Summer reading". That'll have to wait 6 months or so
 

« first day (3789 days earlier)      last day (1076 days later) »