« first day (3257 days earlier)      last day (1618 days later) » 

6:30 AM
@EvanCarroll It's deleted :(
 
7:21 AM
@PeterVandivier not curved, useless.
Good morning
 
7:50 AM
Some of these questions.
 
8:10 AM
Morning
 
 
2 hours later…
10:36 AM
Morning
 
 
2 hours later…
12:27 PM
Morning
 
@Johnakahot2use yes
 
 
1 hour later…
1:34 PM
I voted to re-open this because the OP has made the asked-for changes to their question. I'd answer it, but I don't know enough about indexing in PostgreSQL to be of real help.
 
1:55 PM
Datetimes are the bane of my existence, can someone tell me why this is getting a conversion error? SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,'11/01/19',103) SQLServer
if i take the 103 out it works, but using the 103 for british date format
nvm, it should be 3, not 103, long week
 
2:08 PM
@MaxVernon It still remains unclear, in my view. How does an ER model for a single table differs from that table itself? What does it have to do with indexing in general and Postgres in particular?
 
2:22 PM
@mustaccio I agree it's not a perfect question, I just didn't want the OP, after they've updated the question several times, to lose patience with us. Just trying to be as welcoming as possible. It seems to me, someone could provide a CREATE TABLE statement with likely helpful indexing for the scenarios they've presented in their question.
 
2:46 PM
I think i understand the question now. OP is looking for a database diagram to represent the table he/she/they/x are showing in the example. Some form of normalised database design to import that data.
 
Is it still called an ERD if it contains just one table/entity?
 
@AndriyM Not ERD, e.g. NERD
2
 
3:08 PM
@CadeRoux My kind of diagram
 
@AndriyM could be self-referencing. So: yes.
 
3:24 PM
Okay
Thanks John
 
 
2 hours later…
4:56 PM
0
Q: How can I order rows returned by the RETURNING clause of a DML statement?

varun kumarI am using this statement to get all the rows ordered by timestamp in ascending order DELETE FROM @tableName WHERE id = ANY ( SELECT id FROM @tableName WHERE source = :p1 AND target = :p2 @readCondition ORDER BY createddate LIM...

Interesting question if I correctly understood what was asked
 
 
1 hour later…
6:00 PM
@TomV-TeamMonica Well that's one excellent question you missed out on
 
 
1 hour later…
7:08 PM
I see we have the new welcoming close reason UI now.
11
Q: New Post Notices are live network-wide

Yaakov EllisA few minutes ago, new Post Notices was launched across the Stack Exchange network. This includes all public sites, all meta sites, and all Basic and Business tier Teams (Enterprise tier will get it in a future release). For our purposes, a 'post notice' includes any status banner shown on quest...

 
7:34 PM
Welcome, aaaaand you're closed.
 
 
1 hour later…
8:46 PM
> Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need.
> Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer.
These two sentences are opening sentences from two close reasons' descriptions. To me they look almost completely interchangeable
The word "limit" kind of prevents the second one from being used instead of the first one, but you can still substitute the first one for the second one.
 
@MaxVernon Yeah but who could object to a dusky blue colour!
@AndriyM Do not question the improvements!
You could be labelled a heretic
 
9:16 PM
The improvements will continue until the questions improve
 
@AndriyM I agree. The new reasons are just way too unclear. VtC as Unclear what you're saying.
at least they're non confrontational and gender neutral.
/phew
@PaulWhitesaysGoFundMonica the pink police
 
9:33 PM
@MaxVernon sounds stereotypical, you boomer
 
Oh, and closed questions used to be shown as 'on hold' for the first five days, both in the title and in the notification box. Apparently we are now back to the old terminology, which means they are 'closed' straight away.
 
Yes but they're light blue now.
Stop focussing on the negatives.
 
This is a first I think
> Thanks for the feedback! Votes cast by those with less than 100 reputation are recorded, but do not change the publicly displayed post score.
At least it's new to me
 
@PaulWhitesaysGoFundMonica To be serious for a second, I actually don't have an opinion on that either way. But it's a curious change, because I remember that the 'on hold' thing was sold at the time as one way to be friendlier to newcomers.
 
@TomV-TeamMonica New to me too. Under what circumstances did you encounter that?
 
9:42 PM
I voted on that meta post
 
@AndriyM That was back in the old days, before we really understood what being friendly meant 👋🏼
@TomV-TeamMonica I got:
 
Aparrently I have 99 rep on meta. Must have lost a point somewhere after the 100 association bonus
 
My point being that message still says 15 rep.
 
You deleted your account right?
 
9:44 PM
@TomV-TeamMonica Likely two points, given that you start with 1 (so +100 gives you 101).
 
Well the action was accepted in some way for me
 
@TomV-TeamMonica Have you asked about it on main meta?
 
Are you joking?
 
I'm not asking on main meta
 
9:45 PM
Too unfriendly there?
 
I value whatever sanity I have left
 
@PaulWhitesaysGoFundMonica But will you be joking about that in the future?
 
@AndriyM Only if I want to JEAGL it.
 
Fair point
 
Although I feel offended rn I am old enough to vote but my vote doesn't count. I'll rant on Twitter instead so somebody notices I'm triggered
I can barely breathe
 
10:02 PM
Create trigger on tomv...
 
after update?
 

« first day (3257 days earlier)      last day (1618 days later) »