@AJHenderson It's the only way we have, they use questions like "do you believe in higher powers?" etc. If they answer no, the box "non-religious" is ticked.
@Cerberus right, I get that, I'm just saying I don't think you can really study if people are truly personally religious and investing in their religion vs just thinking "I'm a good person, so of course I'm religious"
@AJHenderson Admittedly it will work better for people who are already not part of an organized religion, and people who live in a society where religion is not the norm any more. But either way, you can still compare historical results and identify trends.
you can't measure how much someone actually believes something easily. In my experience, (which is in no way scientific or statistically significant) I encounter far more people now who I would say actually take a questioning look at their faith and grow stronger as a result vs simply accepting the cultural norm, in large part because it is no longer the cultural norm so much
@AJHenderson The accuracy of people's answers to such questions is taken as an unknown variable. You have to work around it, which is at least theoretically possible if you compare polls taken at different times.
@AJHenderson You ask them, "do you believe in a higher power?", "can the universe be fully explained by science?", etc. etc. It's not perfect, but I think you get significant results.
@AJHenderson If you observe that at first 80% of your respondents say they believe in a higher power, then ten years later it's 70%, I think you have evidence that personal religion may be declining.
One is talking about looking for people who have questioned, resolved, and grown in their faith - the other is talking about faith in general vs organized religion
@Cerberus what I'm looking for is why someone believes (or doesn't believe in) a higher power. Or why they do or don't believe science can explain the universe
is it something they simply did without thinking about it
or is it something they thought about, reflected about the world and decided
@AJHenderson "Why" is a difficult question. I was just talking about how you can measure to what degree personal religion declines as apart from organised religion.
if 90% of people basically take whatever is fed to them as the basis of their world view, if the culture changes, you are going to see massive declines
@Cerberus there is a correlation that people who tend to question tend to be the ones who go in to science and tend to be the ones to lead the spear on the cultural change
they are less likely to accept something for cultural reasons
@Cerberus right, it isn't so much that I think science and non-religiousness is linked so much as thinking for yourself leads you to not accept something purely because of cultural norms
@AJHenderson I would state it in even plainer economic terms: people from the higher strata of society are more likely to lead in cultural developments. They are also more likely to go to university.
@Cerberus yeah, and that's why I objected to the characterization of scientists as being opposed to religion, it is more just that they are naturally among the first to shed religion for religion's sake
instead, those in such fields that choose to be religious are much more likely to do so because of actual personal convinction
which, interestingly, might make an interesting way to study trends in another 20 years or so
oh hey, and @Jolenealaska - just in way of closing. I do totally get that you don't subscribe at all to any religion and think they are completely wrong in their views of why things are proper. Literally all I was trying to say is that, from a secular philosophy perspective, the philosophy of most religions towards achieving a perfect world have much in common with common secular philosophies.
You can find world religions that match up with just about every major philosophy and the most popular religions tend to also match up with the most popular philosophies relatively closely
in no way did it mean that I thought you were somehow slightly religious
I know some people try to make that incredibly stupid argument that you must be religious in denial because you have some philosophy in common. That was not what I was saying at all, just in case it seemed like that is what I was saying