« first day (200 days earlier)      last day (1029 days later) » 

blunders
blunders
13:47
@MatthewHaugen: Do you know if the ten questions from the content QA where randomly select, selected based on soon algorithm, or hand-picked? Also, what happens to the results of the eval. If they're not posted publicly I plan to post my answers with the questions and any comments to meta with using the spoiler tag, since to me the value is the community talking about the content, not using the community to generate a report for SE.
Limited experience doing the content QA, think this is only the 2nd or 3rd time for me; though possible I'm confusing it with something else, or a past version of it.
 
6 hours later…
Matthew Haugen
Matthew Haugen
20:11
@blunders Community will post the results when it's done. That said, it's not super uncommon for users to post answers to that question with their thoughts, so if you'd like to do that, all the power to you. The automated process, of course, knows only which one of the three options you've selected, and it doesn't know why you've selected it.
 
2 hours later…
Nero
Nero
21:42
How do you do the 10 reviews of the Site Self-Evaluation queue in about 1m30s? O_o
blunders
blunders
22:01
@Nero Looking at your activity it appears that it took you much longer that one minute and thirty seconds, what do you mean?
Nero
Nero
@blunders I noticed this user in the review queue's stats page: startups.stackexchange.com/users/222/…
blunders
blunders
@MatthewHaugen Yes, it appears that most communities don't do much with this, and for that matter, I've yet to find a comment from an SE staff on one of these post, though there are often comments from the community about the eval that go unaddressed.
@Nero Thanks, didn't want to assume that's what you meant, but yeah, doesn't look good.
Nero
Nero
@blunders Ah okay. No problem.
Is there something that can/should be done?
Also, I've randomly looked at some of his other linked accounts of beta sites and it is the same every time.
blunders
blunders
22:35
@Nero Unlikely, to be honest, users are users; meaning I asked a longtime ago on SE-meta what a "healthy" user looks like and it did not go over well.
Matthew Haugen
Matthew Haugen
23:35
@Nero If it makes you feel any better (or worse), that user happens to be the one that actually proposed Startups on Area 51. But no, there are review bans occasionally given out, but ultimately there's a reason that review actions aren't binding--some people take it more seriously than others.
@blunders Yeah, it's really up to us how seriously we want to take it, and beyond that, how much we really care about the metrics that it looks for. It's important to consider the results, and the process for that matter, but it's really a community matter, so Stack Exchange employees leave it up to us.
That said, if there are any questions that anyone has about it that need an employee's expertise, I'd be more than happy to ping a Community Manager and ask for input.

« first day (200 days earlier)      last day (1029 days later) »