@blunders I'm a bit curious, why did you reject this edit?

startups.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/3261

In my oppinion I did not do drastic changes to the post. I just removed some text that did not provide any information.

@Nero Declined the edit since showing the link was removed provides context to the OP's intent when they asked the question, and makes users aware if for some reason that they want to see the link that it is present in the edit logs. Make sense?

@blunders Okay, thanks, I see your reasoning. But in my opinion, some information should either be in the post or not present at all. That's why I removed that part.

@blunders I agree with Nero's edit, but I also agree with your point. My solution was to leave a comment, informing the user of our standards and welcoming her to the site. This way, the comment can be deleted eventually, and the post isn't cluttered with non-question material, but users looking for the link will still be easily able to find it in the revision history if they'd like.

Hello all

@c0dem0nkey hello

@c0dem0nkey Hi :)

@MatthewHaugen why did you delete your answer to the bug question?

@Esq The valid point was made that it was probably too long to be helpful.

I could edit it down to be a bit more manageable, but I don't have that much time right now so I figured I'd let other people answer, and maybe undelete later, depending.

@MatthewHaugen maybe you could ask the community help shorten it? i agree it was long, but it was nice to see a lot of different views in a single post