« first day  last day (15 days later) » 

Dr. Banjadebaje
Dr. Banjadebaje
00:21
I replied yes, I do—sometime more sometime less but it balances out. I am not entitled to your opinion.
And I am very clear, I am not submitting to corporate publishers even it hurts writers including myself. Because, it’s our responsibility to make those are taking unnecessary advantages of experts. We seems to working towards tenure, advancing science and many more (you name it). But in fact we are submitting ourself and our hard earned knowledge for free to those who can profit from it
This is simply not acceptable to me. Science can advance in many ways. There are millions of ways we can just benefit ourself, advance science, but not submit ourself to such corporate publishers. This can be done by doing enough work to advance science and benefit academics but not benefit publishers—especially not for free.
This is fundamental economics. We academicians are divided thinking we don’t benefit if we don’t support corporate publishers. That is not true. we can benefit in many ways without supporting corporate publishers—by doing enough work to advance science, academic works and demanding publishers to pay to do more work.
Dr. Banjadebaje
Dr. Banjadebaje
00:46
I replied yes, I do—sometimes more sometimes less but it balances out. I am not entitled to your opinion.
And I am very clear, I am not submitting to corporate publishers even if it hurts writers including myself. Because it’s our responsibility to make those who are taking unnecessary advantage of experts by making us review works for free when they are profiting from it--I take this as another form of slavery where people are made to work for free. We did not earn education for free. Not a single consulting service is done for free. No library can get free access to articles behind the pa…

« first day  last day (15 days later) »