« first day (669 days earlier)      last day (4509 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 23:00

00:43
@AviD Yes, I got de-modded, and (apparently) they asked @Hendrik to assume the job. Not that I did much anyway.
For the question, well, theoretically, ASN.1 is generic, and the question just happens to be related to a cryptographic context on a mere coincidence. It is less crypto than programming.
01:24
Morning folks.
cpusage.com Interesting startup.
 
3 hours later…
 
3 hours later…
07:51
@AviD That's so Billy Mays-esque
08:10
@AviD I don't think it is a good fit for crypto. It might be appropriate for programmers, at least they list data structures in their FAQ.
@ThomasPornin Oh, I did not know that. They asked me whether I wanted to help with the moderation of crypto, without giving any background information.
09:09
morning!
10:44
that's an interesting last message to join to!
@Iszi nothing specific, no. there are bunch of kinda-sortas in , though in truth none that I was really thrilled about.
not that this one is so much better...
@ThomasPornin in your case, it was probably a promotion above a simple moderator.
are you guys also reading this one as a list question?
1
Q: Plausible deniability for phones

Matthew SmithI have sensitive data on my computers and phones. I use Trycrypt's plausible deniability system on my computers. When law enforcement/border patrol or my spouse asks for access I type in the password for the decoy system. I need this badly for my phone. Does anyone know how to install a plausible...

other than @josh's answer, it is a list. But his answer does provide some real redeeming value...
11:15
@AviD Well, it won't be a list (or at least not a very listy one) until there are several products which offer the requested service. @josh's answer highlights the fact that the question is ill-defined.
@ThomasPornin okay, not so much of a list, rather a product recommendation request. (list-of-one is still a list :) ).
@josh's answer kinda answers the question that should have been asked. you think the q should be closed?
11:30
Haha, this is so true...
"She's 16 and performing on X-Factor, what an inspiration" ... A MAN JUST JUMPED FROM THE EDGE OF FUCKING SPACE!!!!
2
I think this is a policy we should adopt here, too:
-3
A: FAQ: When is it appropriate to "be a dick" on Skeptics?

Ron MaimonIt is ethically required to "be a dick" all the time, as this is the only way to keep the devils and politicians from taking over. Politeness is the enemy of truth, it is the enemy of progress, and one must be as rude as possible to get ideas across in a straightforward way. This can be done with...

I mean, the rest of us, besides @ScottPack who already has.
3
11:46
@AviD you mean we aren't already?
@TerryChia I think we're doing a good job so far, but I can't help but think we could do more. So much more.
@AviD We should have a badge that rewards dickish behaviour. It could be called as he is the shining beacon in this chat room.
We should have a badge that rewards scottish behaviour. It could be called as that is the shining beacon in all chat rooms.
@AviD Scottish being in reference to the person or the country?
12:02
@TerryChia heh, good point.
12:14
I hate all y'all.
@ScottPack @TerryChia so both, I guess.
gmorning @scotty!
12:33
@AviD As a generic rule, I am all for measured and unexaggerated hammering, especially for questions which have received a good answer.
In particular for questions which have received a good answer from me.
But this also extends to good answers from somebody else.
12:58
@ThomasPornin Feel like dropping your bear-boot down on this one? security.stackexchange.com/questions/22634/hurr-durr-owncloud
13:47
@Polynomial I am doing it right now.
14:08
THIS IS DONE.
lol
@ThomasPornin Took the words right out of my mouth with the seeding problem.
timestamps are hideously anaemic in the entropy department.
14:26
@Polynomial Current time is not a secret.
God why do we still use IE7
@LucasKauffman In my case, that's because I don't have the choice. This is an administrative decision (or, rather, an administrative lack of decision).
Same here they have some special proxy thingies that prevent me from using a different browser
ATM I'd actually be happy with IE9
is it called UberCyberSecureProxyâ„¢?
@LucasKauffman Here, they apparently rely on my lawfulness for not using another browser. Which is why I do some of my browsing (including this very chat interface) from another machine, that I contact through RDP.
This complies to the local rules (no other browser, no installation of extra software) and it even is more secure (if trouble arises, it will strike the machine into which I RDPize, not my desktop system).
14:38
@polymonial something I need to find away around without violating company policy :(
@LucasKauffman The RDP thing may work, if you have a target system on the outside (and configure it to do the RDP over port 443). Of course, performance is poor (don't try to look at videos).
That's the problem I am only allowed to browse all the rest is blocked outgoing the only way to get to the Internet is by using the web proxy :(
Cause I have ssh running on 443 for just this thing
@LucasKauffman For HTTPS, the proxy protocol goes with a "CONNECT" and, afterwards, that's just bidirectional binary data forward.
Some advanced proxies could notice that the traffic is still not a SSL handshake, and block it. Some such proxies even perform MitM attacks (with a special root installed in the desktop systems), which is kind of hard to bypass.
The problem is getting through the proxy I'm still finding out what credentials it's using
@Thomas yea indeed :(
another solution, and this is probably my bias and spoiledness, is to only work at enlightened companies. :-)
probably one of the reasons I work for myself, too...
15:06
@LucasKauffman In a Windows setup, it might reuse your authentication (hence Kerberos, Active Directory... the whole thing).
15:32
@ThomasPornin @LucasKauffman I'd agree in most cases where you're not being prompted for creds, it's the windows auth. which is being used. Failing that have you tried with no auth? Surprisingly I've seen places that have a proxy and force access via that but don't authenticate it...
2
Q: Software Life-cycle of Hacking

David KaczynskiAt my local university, there is a small student computing club of about 20 students. The club has several small teams with specific areas of focus, such as mobile development, robotics, game development, and hacking / security. I am introducing some basic agile development concepts to a couple...

Any of you folks wanna pop over there to give a better answer?
16:05
Good morning, folks
@TerryChia oo interesting. I thought it was going to be about something else, then he went a different way.
that said, I dont think that there is a good answer - too many disparate types to compare anything.
@AviD I feel that their standards over at programmers are slightly more lax than ours. at least when browsing through their questions.
@TerryChia's answer is the closest, or at least in the right direction, but didnt go far enough.
@TerryChia for sure. They really built the "good subjective" criteria.
@AviD I have a brief idea of what it is about. but i don't really have much firsthand experience to actually go further with more details into each development methodology.
I did flag it to move here - I cant be bothered writing up a good long answer over there :)
@TerryChia well thats my point - experience in one is very different from another. You gave two good examples, to start with, but its still more than that.
16:14
Is it a better fit here though? The question is really more about the software methodology, instead of a specific security concern.
actually, the asker had a good point (and why I think it would be better here) - the maintainence aspect will make for some pretty big distinctions between the types.
compare metasploit to a 0day to stuxnet to skiddies to.... etc.
@AviD Hmm, my take on the question is not so much on impact of the code. Sure, the exploits available in Metasploit have a very different impact compared to 0-days, but all exploits start as 0-days. From a code standpoint - are they really that much different?
@TerryChia Maintenance.
I think the tool/framework vs exploit code for a specific situation is what the asker is looking for, especially in the context of Programmers.SE.
or in other words, lifetime.
16:19
@AviD Care to elaborate?
@TerryChia two big aspects here, both coming back to the expected lifetime of the produced software.
one, is how quickly the software needs to pop up - obviously 0days want to come out quicker, packaged products can spend some more time packaging.
two is how long in the future the software will be used - versioning, reuse, etc as opposed to a one-off fire-and-forget exploit missile.
combined in that are also requirements around stability, and so forth.
then on the other end you have the "militarized" hacks such as stuxnet, which is kind of an extreme on one scale, and the other extreme on the other.
@AviD Ah, but there is a different between the exploit code found in Metasploit and the framework itself no?
so, what I was saying was that given these two (not necessasrily complete) scales, you noted two specific datapoints on it.
@TerryChia mebbe, mebbe no. Some of the exploits are rushed out, to take advantage of a specific 0day - some are properly engineered for long term use.
and again, compare to other types of exploitware.
@AviD I see your point - but in the context of the question: I really doubt exploit codes follow a software development lifecycle. But software like the various scanners do.
@TerryChia that is my point.
packaged software does. one-off exploits do not. viruses might, depending. weaponized malware does, extremely so. crimeware, probably, again depending.
which is kind of what your answer was trying to say, but not strongly enough, imo.
or rather, not dickishly enough.
2
since I'm too lazy to write up a proper answer for p.se, and since it probably wont move over here, I would support you expanding your answer with my input, if you want to.
16:35
@RoryMcCune defo with auth, have tried a lot of things, next thing is to install wireshark and see what happens
@AviD I'll see what I can do.
@LucasKauffman I don't get why companies think restricting the software choices available to pen-testers are a good idea. ;)
@TerryChia we actually get our own network though, but if I want to use the internal network I can't. However I do have local admin so in the end I can do what I want. The problem is there are policies, I don't want to circumvent them if I don't have to
Guys, I was just thinking about SmartCards again
Is it possible to have the functionality of a SmartCard, except instead of a card, in a USB flash drive?
at least for authentication purposes (windows login, maybe signing emails, etc)
sure, take a look at e.g. alladin etoken.
The problem with a flash drive is that you can read / write to the memory. What makes a smart card so special is that you send it data which is processed and sent back.
16:41
@AviD I mean like my personal flash drive
Reading the private key is impossible; something that is impossible to implement on a regular flash drive.
@JeffFerland Couldn't a USB device (not a flash drive) be configured to act the same?
@JeffFerland true, but cant you make it read-only using software?
not the most secure, but would probably defeat noobies
@Iszi then it would be a smartcard the size of a pendrive?
GODAMNIT are there any free security trainings?
@LucasKauffman Actually, we'd probably be looking at a smartcard + reader in a pendrive case.
16:42
@David Well, there is that pain-in-the-ass S3 software that comes on some USB drives. Those present the media to the OS as something different. However they do that might be a step in the right direction.
@Iszi Yes
hrmm
it'd be insecure as shit, but better slightly more secure than nothing
the aks etoken is obviously not a regular flash drive. its the same functionality as a smartcard, but implemented with a usb interface.
@AviD More or less what I was suggesting/expecting.
@LucasKauffman How are we defining "free" and "security trainings"?
something like elearnsecurity
but then a lot more modules
@Iszi hmm. seems they were acquired by safenet a few years ago...
was talking about something like this: safenet-inc.com/products/data-protection/…
16:48
OMG. My weekend project has got to be to sort through my bookmarks. Nevermind the mess in my other folders, I've got one labeled "Unchecked/Unsorted" that has a metric crap-tonne that need to be gone through.
@AviD Made a couple of small edits, have a look. Not gonna bother to write anymore though.
Gonna head to bed. Have a nice day you folks in the rest of the world.
@TerryChia well, I'd already upvoted you, so I cant do that again.
but the commenthread on the q expanded a bit, and i think he gets the point.
course, I coulda got me some upclicks if id put our convo and my comments into an answer... :)
@AviD Said it before, and I'll say it again: I often wish we could up-vote edits.
what's the opposite of a repwhore? repprude?
haha, lovely... for all you Mac fans out there:
user image
2
New policy: you create the tag, you write the wiki for it.
@Polynomial that's you ^^^
17:02
@JeffFerland Could have been worse. Could have made it .
@AviD How much extra do you have to pay for the PC case to not look like a teenager's idea of good taste?
@JeffFerland Actually, I'm pretty sure that'd make it cheaper.
@Iszi or .
@JeffFerland yeah, thats extra for the gaming cases.
@Iszi I remember when modded cases were really awesome because people did the work and it was a source of pride and accomplishment. Now people just buy the crap.
@JeffFerland Kinda like ham radio, eh?
17:04
@AviD Now you know: PC users are just cheapstakes.
@ThomasPornin cheapskates, or care about ROI?
@AviD I see two "MasterCard ad" responses to that one: For the PC - "Having a system you can use the way you want to: Priceless". For the Mac - "Having a system that 'just works': Priceless".
@AviD ROI for a computer ? I prefer to think of machines as consumables. Which they tend to be.
@ThomasPornin okay, not roi, then value for cash. is there a managementese buzzword for that?
@AviD ROIry?
17:08
@Iszi You still have to work at getting SDR to play nice :P
aright, time to get me to work
@AviD "Ostentatious display of wealth"
An obviously expensive computer is the right thing to have in businesses which must inspire trust and awe, e.g. banks and jewelers.
@JeffFerland Oh, crap. It's still that time of day? Drat.
17:35
@AviD Sent that to a friend, got this back...
Interestingly, I also prefer American muscle over foreign exotic.
I really really wish I could get US prices for computer parts.
it's ridiculous, especially with sites like newegg.
even after you take exchange rate and tax into account, it's still 10% cheaper.
@Polynomial Hrm? 'Supwitdat?
@Iszi UK retailers set the prices high, so even though there's competition they always make a crazy profit.
whereas the profit margins are much smaller in the USA, but they sell more in bulk.
so places like newegg probably have a few tens of thousands of orders a day
@Polynomial So, you're saying U.K. retailers are like this...?
whereas OcUK probably get a few hundred.
something like that, yeah.
the first rule of acquisition is be a total dick-lobe.
that used to be the case, actually.
you couldn't RMA anything if you'd plugged it in.
which was ridiculous. eventually trading standards stopped that bullshit, but it didn't happen until about 2004.
Reminds me of a bash.org quote...
lol
this is still my favourite: qdb.us/300391
That took me a while to catch up to the present. Evening all :-)
Afterafternoon :)
17:52
@Iszi I like the noise of a big Chevy V8, and dislike most screamy V12's...but I really love my burbling 2.5l flat-four - which is Japanese :-)
@Polynomial Awesome.
@Polynomial that is epic
@RoryAlsop Yeah, I'm having to get used to an I4 myself, these days. Never owned anything smaller than an I6 until now. But, gas prices and all tend to influence these things.
Mine's still Merkin though.
Haven't owned an import yet.
so I heard something pretty crazy today
@Iszi :-) Always loved the cost/performance aspect of Subarus. £20k gives me 400bhp and a 0-60 in 4.2 seconds and a 195mph top speed. In a family wagon which I take camping :-)
instant win
17:55
according to some insiders at a "large anti-malware company" (no idea which), there's a new bit of state-sponsored APT-style malware around
and it uses some existing known Windows privilege escalations to gain SYSTEM, then loads bunch of AV drivers with legit signatures and uses them to mess with the system
now that is smart.
and a tad scary
guessing that'll probably pop up on The Twitters in the next few weeks
well, from the sounds of it it's highly targeted, so it's no so scary for the every day person
but it's still incredibly smart and slightly worrying
and really breaks the concept of driver signing as a definitive security measure
I'm not exactly clear on the details, though; I heard this through a friend that read it on a private discussion board where a bunch of AV techs were hanging out.
@RoryAlsop All my previous cars had >250 HP (except the Jeep). This one's <180. Not bad on fuel costs over a ~120-mile round-trip commute, though.
I only have 112 HP :(
company car needs to be eco
@Iszi I swapped my wife's 340HP Subaru for a 115HP Honda Jazz. Bit less exciting, but her mpg has gone up from 24 to 52 :-)
18:04
I have 0.23 HP. I'm not as powerful as a horse.
Definitely feels like I'm driving with half an engine. But, the I4's these days aren't quite as wimpy as they used to be.
@Polynomial I bet you have measured it and that is the actual figure, no?
@RoryAlsop Yeah, my DD swap took me from 15.5 to somewhere between 26 - 28.
@RoryAlsop Based on rough kinetic energy output while running.
@RoryAlsop that car must have been an awesome toy to drive no?
18:05
@RoryAlsop To be fair, I did measure against a small horse.
6
Out of context, that sounds soooooooooo wrong.
@LucasKauffman not as fun as mine. Think her 0-60 was only 5.8 seconds
@Polynomial it is starred for posterity
erh
@RoryAlsop what did you drive?
@LucasKauffman I have a Litchfield spec Forester STi:
the old one was an Impreza with all the Prodrive mods :-)
holly
that looks like an suv
By the way, on a slightly political note (but still on the topic of security), Gary McKinnon's extradition decision is made tomorrow.
18:08
it sounds like a rally car
and seems to drive like a rally car o.o
@LucasKauffman a small SUV. Same chassis and engine as the Impreza
it makes Vicky Butler Henderson squeal
instant win
for a while I had Recaro children's seats in it
me == petrolhead
if you get a sec (and you have Twitter), drop JanisSharp (GM's mother) a tweet if support of the hard work she's been doing.
@Polynomial GM?
General Motors?
Gary McKinnon (read my previous)
his extradition appeal case is decided tomorrow
18:10
ahhh - yes, I get confused every time I see her name and his in a news article
the USA want him extradited, and several doctors have all said that he's not mentally healthy enough to go, and would very likely take his own life
plus it's totally bullshit that they're trying to extradite him anyway
he broke UK law, in the UK, in an effort to prove to the US that their systems weren't secure.
He was never a very well lad - and from the perspective of what hackers do, his wasn't anywhere up there compared to some - who haven't ever been threatened with extradition
he has Aspergers Syndrome, there's no way he had full comprehension of the gravity of his actions. the dude should be given a slap on the wrist and a job.
but because the US was made to look silly, they're butthurt and out for blood
different topic - anyone who wants to comment on ISACA's audit and assurance guidance - it is up for public comment at: isaca.org/standardexposure
@RoryAlsop you aware of any good free elearnings for pentesting? I havent got budget until next year to get a proper certificate :(
18:14
@LucasKauffman don't you get access to the internal eXtreme Hacking course? Speak to Lars Weimar or the Frankfurt lads.
@LucasKauffman Do you really need to get a cert?
@RoryAlsop yea I have extreme hacking next year, Erik teaches it actually, might just ask to get my hands on the docs
the only one I can really think of that is vaguely worth it is CISSP.
@LucasKauffman a lot of it you can go through yourself. There is an excellent vulnerable banking app you'll have access to as well.
@Polynomial yes and no, I dont have to, but I want to, I want something that vouches for my skills. I'm defo doing OSCP when I get to staff 2
18:16
@LucasKauffman I guess. Most places just ignore them, though.
@RoryAlsop I already owned that one I think, it was part of my prep for the RBS assault course
from the perspective of certs, as @Poly says, CISSP is useful on a CV or proposal, and then things like OSCP, and further down the line CISM
@LucasKauffman cool
@Polynomial also problem with CISSP is that I need to have 5 years of experience :(
I was originally looking round at CEH / CompTIA Security+, but I got warned off them by pretty much everyone in the security business.
@LucasKauffman You can get Associate of (ISC)^2 meanwhile.
18:18
@Iszi Isn't that basically "give us some money and you can have a certificate"?
yea but E&Y only pay from senior 2 or 3 I think
@Polynomial Dunno why on CEH. But I can understand with Sec+. It's very entry-level, so really not much worthwhile.
@Polynomial No, you have to pass the same test as full CISSP.
@Iszi CEH is really a cert that says you know how some tools work
@Iszi Hmm, ok.
@RoryAlsop Exactly.
CEH is basically "I know how to do the metasploits"
@RoryAlsop True enough.
18:19
in saying that, when hiring grads it gives us an idea that they know something in security
CISSP is basically "I know lots of shit about all sorts of crazy syssec/netsec/appsec theory and information security management"
which is good.
@Polynomial yea I already read the CISSP book, it's a lot of theory but nothing really complex and no hands on
exactly
CISSP is good if you're an information officer.
And I guess, at least according to a certain chessbird, CVEs are basically saying "I pwns j00!"
CVEs on your CV are pretty good.
but they only express one side of it - "I can find bugs in systems"
18:21
In practice it's worth almost nothing when doing pentesting, the only thing that you might even remotely do with it is become CISO or do some regulating/standardising
it doesn't say anything about your theoretical or practical knowledge of mitigating those problems
or anything about your risk management skills
@Polynomial well, here we see CISSP as a reasonable step for thos with a bit of tech, on their way to something else
CISM much more useful for the management side
and SANS/OSCP etc for real hands on
if you've got a bunch of CVEs to your name and a CEH cert, then you're in for a good time on the job market as a pentester.
not a senior pentester, but a pentester
18:22
@RoryAlsop s/SANS/GIAC
and ideally CREST in the UK
@Iszi erm, yep :-)
@RoryAlsop Been meaning to look into that.
@RoryAlsop yea me and other Rory were talking about CREST the other day, it's like ticket to pro pentesting right?
CEH is also recognized by the U.S. Gov't.
@LucasKauffman it is getting closer to being a requirement for quite a few large orgs
definitely aiming at the gold standard
18:24
then again, I don't have a single CVE to my name, but I have both wide and deep programming knowledge, plus a lot of security theory. so I don't do too badly on the job offer front.
CEH + U.S. Gov. job = CNDA
@Iszi I misread that as = CANADA
Don't mess with me, I'm a CEH
lol...
one of the things I have looked into is the EC|Council's C|CISO cert. Again - it's just a cert, but can maybe open doors
18:25
@RoryAlsop mmm suggest I would be able to get in a sale or 2 , you think I might be able to convince the partner in letting me get training earlier?
@LucasKauffman partners at the Big-4 love Business Cases (capitalised deliberately :-)
so you'd need to have a good argument as to what the benefits were
get Erik's input as well :-)
@David Don't mess with me, I'm an MCSE!
@David I thought you were joking!
@RoryAlsop if I get a sale it's going to be on Erik's account anyway since he's the manager, anyways you guys at deloite interested in a pentest ;D?
18:27
hahahaha - I'm at PwC. How dare you!
or, even more fun
Really? I thought you were Deloite :o
"Don't mess with me, I'm MOS"
@LucasKauffman nah - the two I haven't tried are Deloitte and KPMG
me: Don't mess with me, I'm too lazy to get any certifications
18:28
@David I think this needs sending to memegenerator. Back soon...
@RoryAlsop KPMG took some blows though, I think one more and it's going to be the big 3
especially the big fraud case here in Belgium a few years ago
@David I prefer "Don't mess with me, I spend my time actually learning things instead of chasing after pointless certifications"
it's a bit long winded, but... :P
and then we have folks like Grant Thornton and Baker Tilly waiting in the wings (at least in the UK)
@RoryAlsop not really, we bought Grant Thornton :P
@LucasKauffman in Belgium? Cool
they seem to still be separate here
18:30
yea, pretty sad for the newcomers, some of them started working at GT because they did not want to work for the big 4, suddenly they hear that from january they will actually have to anyway
btw
anyone else bugged by the fact that there's no apostrophe in "don't" in that CEH advert?
@Polynomial I wasn't until now. Thanks a lot. :-P
@Polynomial or make it say "I'm a CEH"
@RoryAlsop and I have already got 4 weeks of audit :'(
18:33
Alex Miller on October 15, 2012

It’s Back! Welcome to episode #33 of the Stack Exchange podcast.  We’ve got a brand new co-host (Jay Hanlon, our new VP of Community Growth) plus our guest this week is David Fullerton, VP of Engineering at Stack Exchange.

So what’s new in the seven months since our last podcast? Check out the new and improved review queue! If you’ve got enough reputation, you can see the review button at the top of any Stack Exchange site. The new system is clearer to use and it’s fast thanks to a ton of AJAX goodness. …

@LucasKauffman ooo - the joy
Well - got a week without kids (they are at their granny's for mid-term) so guess what I am doing tonight: writing an article for the ISACA journal and finishing up a presentation for the Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors. The excitement is almost palpable...
@RoryAlsop ooh is it a PwC exclusive or can I have a peek?
@LucasKauffman the ISACA one is a 'me' article and the presentation will be as president of ISACA Scotland, so definitely not PwC branded - so yes I can ping you a copy
18:44
curious - I've only seen/heard CREST mentioned at all in the UK. wondering if its used or noticed anywhere else?
@Polynomial niiice.
@Polynomial (with my collar popped)
@AviD I've heard CREST mentioned on LiquidMatrix Security Podcast a few times, and they're mainly Canadian.
@Polynomial no, I meant someplace real.
@AviD lol
@AviD It began in UK as a replacement for CHECK (which is very public sector focused, and not updated fast enough to meet private sector requirements) but it is now gaining interest in US, Canada, Germany and South Africa
18:48
btw @RoryAlsop talking about family cars - I just got a new Ford S-Max - roomy 7-seater, Ford-style power... unfortunately my lease was up on my beloved Honda FRV. wonderful 6 seater, as luxurious as you can get for a family sized car.
The only CREST I'm really familiar with is...
@RoryAlsop and australia :)
@RoryAlsop is it? @Iszi @ScottPack, either of you seen or heard of CREST locally?
@RoryMcCune oh yeah, that's right :-)
cheers
18:49
@Iszi yeah, thats what I always thought of...
CREST is a good one (IMO) I've done a lot of exams over the years but it's definitely the best (and don't get me started on the CISSP :oP)
@RoryMcCune Ive recently let my cissp expire.
I wish the CEH was more like the CPT, but less cheap-feeling.
@AviD yeah I've strongly considered it but I do consultancy and it's a checkbox on a lot of tenders
I like the idea of it, I love the idea of continuing education - but the implementation sucked.
18:50
CPT is pretty much CEH + practical exam requiring a pentest against 2 VMs.
not to mention the steep yearly fees.
@AviD I'm not renewing mine...
the fact that you get CPE's for attending vendor presentations says it all
the only thing more worthless than a clueless certification, is a 12 year old out-of-date certification.
you can have one book a year but unlimited vendor stuff....
18:51
@RoryMcCune yeah, exactly.
that too, my missus was reading the CISSP guide recently and I had to ask if it was a really old version 'cause some of the questions she was asking made me think it must be...
turns out it was a recent one.
@RoryMcCune yeah, thats kind of what rook said - only real reason for it, is RFP responses.
especially government and large corporates.
@AviD yeah pretty much have to have it for that unfortuntely
@RoryMcCune until you become a PHB
I have to go remember all my learning for the last 3 years soon to make sure I retain it...
18:52
then you have people who have it :-)
@RoryMcCune well, since I'm a spoilt git, I can be choosy about my clients :).
@RoryAlsop well there's that. I've applied to get on to the CREST assessor panel so that should be a lot more fun making sure it stays relevant
Ok. Enough with the noise in here. Gotta go do some actual work now.
if I get on <fingers crossed>
@RoryMcCune excellent - can I vote for you :-)
@Iszi TTFN
18:53
@RoryAlsop possibly not but if you know anyone who's on it feel free to tell them how great I am :)
So did people see the nice bit of fail from Santander today ? (seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Oct/101)
that's actually a little surprising, I'd have thought for sure that all the banks would've got the message about storing PANs in the clear by now...
@RoryMcCune a little surprising?
well I'd say completely shocking but I've worked in banking before :op
and I'm sure it will have been flagged and will be on a risk register somewhere.....
19:21
hahahahahaha
oh what have I done
user image
2
who likes Venn diagrams...? Everybody loves Venn diagrams!
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 23:00

« first day (669 days earlier)      last day (4509 days later) »