« first day (84 days earlier)      last day (5094 days later) » 

00:15
@AviD - Is Black Hat our spam guy now?
I didnt do it
dunno, looks like a real user
asked 3 questions, even
I just don't recall him asking those questions. Maybe my memory's fuzzy.
might have changed his name
Also, his names on the other sites are just odd.
yeah, used to be usersomethingorother...
00:19
(ServerFault on ServerFault, StackOverflow on MSO, StackApps, and Programmers, LaTeX on TeX)
heh, unimaginative much
 
3 hours later…
03:38
Wow. Procrastination is at the very verge of being closed (4 votes now) but it has 8 members! It's doing much better than I would have ever expected! (For one, it's still alive!)
Fourth close vote was another "Not a real proposal" vote.
03:59
Wow, that was a big wall of text since I went to gaming
And I missed @RoryAlsop
/me sighs
04:21
Cheese it, it's the fuzz!
Oh, hi @JeffAtwood
04:53
I probably can't chat in here yet...
oh it let me!
Evening
And on that bombshell. Good night!
 
7 hours later…
12:27
Sorry, @Iszi on your luck.
13:14
Finally got closed 7 hours ago, as "poorly defined".
@Iszi :-(
amusing activity before it did get closed though - I think the folks who posted there weren't really procrastinators
13:34
@RoryAlsop, I wouldn't be so sure about that.
You guys want this question migrated?
0
Q: what is the security risk when enabling directory listing in linux web servers

Jayapal ChandranHi, I have a few folders in which i did not have any index.htm or index.php and i dont want to have one so that i can see all the html files in that. I dont have other extensions other than .htm in those folders. What will be the security risk in having directory listing enabled?

13:47
@packs It doesn't look off-topic.
Yeah, the question I was thinking of was where it would be a better fit
In other news, I feel kinda lame-ish right now. SOIS is asking why they should make Onebox links generated from HTTPS Wikipedia addresses, actually point to the secure Wikipedia page. I can't think of how to clearly explain any good reasons in a way that will be likely accepted and acted upon.
@packs Here makes sense.
flaggered
I see it as a nice to have, but not a must have.
The only things I can think of it defending against are Big Brother and Firesheep. But since I don't have (and currently am not interested in) a Wikipedia account, I've got no idea how HTTP Wikipedia normally behaves for logged-in users.
 
5 hours later…
18:59
Anyone around that can approve an edit for me?
4
Q: Stopping someone with physical access from hacking a Windows XP account password

Django ReinhardtHi there. Apparently a computer system protected by a a login password, e.g. Windows XP, can be easily hacked by someone with physical access to it using methods like this one: http://www.raymond.cc/blog/archives/2006/09/02/how-to-hack-into-a-windows-xp-computer-without-changing-password/ Can a...

(In related news, I'm only 86 rep away from being able to edit on my own, in the beta site.)
19:58
What's what, your back has an itch?
:)
20:24
Blaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrggghhh!!!!
Some days I wonder why I still hang around SE.
0
Q: Where is the 'logout' link?

NavI was on the SuperUser homepage, and noticed that there was no logout link. Came to meta and there's still no logout link. It's now missing on the StackOverflow page too. What's going on?

fscking keytab files
Apparently, at some point, they decided it would be a good idea to make the "logout" link as unintuitive and inaccessible as half the other useful features on their sites. Plus, it's not even present at all on Meta profiles!
So, if you want to log out while you're on a meta page, you've got to:
1.) Go into your profile.
2.) Click "main user".
3.) *Then* you have a log out button!
Well, you can't log into the chat site directly either
I almost never log out anyway, but the point remains that it's a fairly common convention to have the log out feature available on all pages of a website.
Similar to my beef with the /review page and, to a somewhat lesser extent, the /privileges page. These (and I'm sure some others) are very useful pages that aren't easily or intuitively accessible.
20:40
Those "hidden" pages are what annoy me the most.
The privs page I can live with, since it's easily accessible (if unintuitive)
The review page, however, has no links to it that I know of.
@packs I've made a couple Meta posts about them, but SOIS doesn't seem to be interested in my input on those topics.
It's the Gnome approach.
Gnome?
Oh, you disagree with our UI decisions? You're clearly using it wrong.
As in the desktop environment?
20:41
aye
@packs Almost sounds like the Steve Jobs approach.
The devs focus on "correct" UI concepts than user input.
They're the usability experts, we're just peons who happen to use it.
Fun stuff to see configuration options disappear because the devs thought that screen looked too 'cluttered'.
I.e., 5 knobs instead of 4
 
3 hours later…
23:27
@Iszi Done :-)

« first day (84 days earlier)      last day (5094 days later) »