@Polynomial yeah, at some point I looked into that too. should be easy to script them all up - the naming convention is simple enough - but then pasting them together.... I couldnt be bothered.
@Polynomial yeah - so cool. not sure I got all of it, but I did reach one of the horizontal edges. dont know about the vertical.
it reminds me of those little doodles in Mad magazine...
Love this, from the forums:
> I went to the left past the top of the building, and thought it was a cute idea. I got to the sailing ship, and realized just how awesome this strip is. I went further and got to the giant pit in the ground, and realized Randall's insane.
Wow. From @AviD's link: "the full picture is 165888x79872 pixels in size" "[with a scale of about 5 pixels/foot] the whole thing [is] about 5km across"
That makes me think. So big storage does file or block level de-duplication. I should talk to our storage guys about doing bit level de-duplication. See how they react.
Someone posted an HTML page that supposedly stitches it all together. Tried loading it in Firefox and my memory usage for Firefox alone shot to over 3 GB.
The guide i'm following says to do the following steps: load up dm_crypt with modprobe dm_crypt, use the command cryptsetup luksOpen to open the partition before mounting it.
This works fine for manual mounting, but how do i get it to mount automatically on boot using the fstab file?
@Polynomial So going back to your hardware issues. Do you have all of the images pulled down and stitched, just awaiting conversion, or do you have them all pulled down with no way to convert and stitch them?
Know what's crazy? When I got to the tower at the left, I started scrolling up, thinking I was at the left edge of the image, and this was just some weird, tiered cliff face there. Didn't figure out that it wasn't until I reached the top of the tower. Also, I didn't realize the ground wasn't the bottom until I started reading the forum thread.
Regardless of what you do at the AP, I believe I can say with a fair amount of certainty that you will at some point find that your wireless data is being broadcast "outside the walls".
First, you must understand that your AP is not the only wireless transmitter on your home network. All of you...
Then I just went down the list until I found one from this calendar year. It would be possible to modify that script to include date, and even to list everyone's posts sorted by length.
@LucasKauffman Go to your profile page. It's the number in the URL path, that's just before your username. It is site-specific also. Yours is 3339 on Sec.SE.
@ScottPack I had apps for that before the Snipping Tool came around. The apps had built-in hotkey functionality, which is sadly missing from Snipping Tool - you've gotta do a modification to the shortcut to get close to the same feature.
@LucasKauffman we are close on this - SE have the numbers for the low level prizes, but we are trying to assess a fair way to assign the level 2 and top prize (as no-one met the thresholds we initially set)
@Polynomial the interesting discussion is around how we assess the relative merit of 10 posts with a score of 1 or more, 5 posts with a score of 5 or more, 1 post with a score of 8 or more
@LucasKauffman yeah - in looking at the basic stats, the weeks we had a rare topic, we were hoping to attract interest on those topics, but we just got tumbleweeds. On the really popular topics, they got quite a bit of interest
@LucasKauffman I wouldn't go quite that far. I will say that only the first week's topics really interested me. That is only a single anecdotal data point.
As Security Stack Exchange has just passed its 1st anniversary of graduation, we are going to follow in the tradition of other sites and run a competition.
With prizes! Cool ones!
Obviously in order to deserve these prizes you'll need to put in some effort, but I know you will rise to the chall...
@LucasKauffman Working title: 'A Method for Dynamic Use of Detection Routines in the Snort Intrusion Detection System'
In short, we wanted to be able to, on-demand or automatically, tweak our IDSes to do more thorough inspection of "suspicious hosts". So either an analyst gets a feeling that somebody isn't acting right but has no evidence they can flip the switch on that address. Or if an automated alert flags on some kind of indicator it can also add them to the list.
So this is building the system and some kind of statistical analysis of the output. Did we find something we wouldn't have normally, are we getting any value from it, etc.
The $k$-anonymization paradigm (and its refinements) means to create datasets where every tuple is identical with $k-1$ others.
However I'm in a situation where people are in the dataset many times. And I want to follow their progress through the health care system, so I need to know who is who....
I think this question should stay on CS as it's rather on the side of theoretical modeling, but I encouraged the asker to come here for a practical view
