As far as I can tell there has been no discussion about this on meta, at least from the quick search that I did. If there is already a prior question about this please close it. :)
Should we as a site allow questions asking about specific wargames and CTFs available? Many of them have been recom...
Since there is no such thing as a “self-destruct email”, you'll need to explain what you mean by this phrase. What distinguishes this email from other emails? — Gilles27 mins ago
@Gilles Let me introduce you to - google.com its a beautiful website, very neat and clean. Type in self destructing email services and woah! so many services available :) — KarmicDice11 mins ago
@KarmicDice Since there is no such thing as a “self-destruct email” (although there are people prepared to sell you one), what do you mean by “self-destruct email”? What makes you think you've received one? P.S. posting the full text (including headers — especially the headers) of what you have would probably make this question answerable. — Gilles1 min ago
I heard a rumor that people who'd subscribed to the software law proposal got an email, but nothing firsthand. I subscribed to the IP law proposal (which was more relevant than software law!) and didn't get anything.
@AndreyBotalov you must have visited on Thursday evening, when the private beta started
@AndreyBotalov go to Area 51, notice that the proposal is marked as about to launch, navigate to the site and create an account very soon after 20:00 GMT (the usual private beta launch time)
> Because you previously committed to Software Law we thought you might be interested in becoming one of the first participants in Ask Patents, a new site dedicated to patent questions and requests for prior art. The private beta is live as of today.
Not sure if I subscribed to IP law too
But Patents are probably the aspect of IP law I'm least interested in
@Gilles Why don't you suggest to SE that sending an email to IP law committers would be a good a idea
It seems that the entire problem could be solved very elegantly by simply adding a new flag to the HTTP cookie specification.
Similarly to how cookies flagged Secure will only be submitted by the user agent over secure connections and those which are flagged HttpOnly will be forever inaccessib...
Hey @AviD - looks like our next ISACA leadership meeting is going to be in Tel Aviv. Early March 2013 - any hints and tips? I had one concern: travel.stackexchange.com/q/9418/1381
@RoryAlsop I think Israel knows the facts of life and recognizes UAE and other Arab states anyway, so at least they won't refuse you outright. It may put you into some “needs further attention” pile.
The reverse is definitely not true, so if you can get a detachable Israeli stamp
It seems that the entire problem could be solved very elegantly by simply adding a new flag to the HTTP cookie specification.
Similarly to how cookies flagged Secure will only be submitted by the user agent over secure connections and those which are flagged HttpOnly will be forever inaccessib...
