« first day (3608 days earlier)      last day (1276 days later) » 

1:02 PM
an interesting story of a mail server that could send mail 500 miles away, but not further:
http://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html
 
 
3 hours later…
3:58 PM
Holy shit, Hunter02, fucking really!?
 
4:10 PM
it's because Hunter01 was too easy to guess... as easy as Maga2020...
 
4:30 PM
Imagine if AzureDiamond was actually Hunter Biden...
 
4:50 PM
@MechMK1 Hey
 
@OakDEV hey
 
I need to securely wipe a HDD.
Is any tool fairly similar or do you have a recommendation?
I'll 7 pass+
 
DBAN works fine
 
Can I run it from the machine to be wiped (upon reboot?)?
 
5:14 PM
yes
and you don't need 7 passes... one is pretty enough for anything besides nsa-targetted hdd... two is overkill. 3 is way too much overkill...
if you are using linux, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4M oflag=direct will suffice
 
Can someone vouch what he said?
Isn't HDD composed of multiple layers (Roughly 7) which still contain unindexed bits of data when written over?
2 passes being overkill is the first time I heard about it.
 
search around... information density on today's disks are so high that one pass overwrites pretty much everything, and any bit left is too thin to be of any use
back on the IDE disks time, a electron microscope could in theory recover some information, but that was a lot of time ago...
and I never heard of multiple layers of unindexed data on a HDD... any reference?
 
Your guess seems more educated than mine. I'll keep it in mind.
Well, it was very basic hardware classes
and I was told hard disks have multiple layers
and when data gets written on top, it falls to the underlaying layer
Which is why (i think) the DoD standard for data deletion is/was 7 passes +
 
DoD instructions were for a couple disk generations ago
 
I'm reading that exactly.
and they are not even using their own standard anymore
 
5:28 PM
back on MBs worth of storage... now with TB disks, that's not needed anymore
 
and the DoD standard "name" is mostly obsolete
That's why I came here.
Thank you.
So a regular 1+2 wipes
 
the "electron microscope"-thing is something that I personally never heard of anyone pulling of.
 
Right (Theoretical)
but explain this then:
I have a regular Sata 256
I wiped it, once, and I could recover some files using recovery softwares.
Back maybe 5 years ago
 
you wiped, or deleted?
 
Fairly certain I wiped, but now I'm not so certain.
Maybe just a reformat.
 
5:34 PM
a reformat is not a wipe, and if you did a quick format, that's expected
 
I know.
Now I almost want to try it
 
but a dd will overwrite everything
try it... dd from /dev/zero over it ONCE, and try to recover something
 
Do you have a small HDD laying nearby?
Can I launch a dban wipe from windows?
 
I don't have any spare hdd around... and you cannot dban from windows
you have to boot from it
 
dban is an OS?
 
5:36 PM
if you have any live linux distro around, you can use it too, instead of dban... but dban is supposedly easier to use
 
liveOS?
Meh, won't use tails for that purpose.
 
yes, it's a iso you copy to a usb drive, boot from it, and nuke the hdd
 
Just out of respect for tails.
Ok cool, common line?
command line*
 
you can use tails, ubuntu, bsd, whatever you have...
from command line, if your hdd is /dev/sda, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4M oflag=direct
 
What does DBAN does different than a regular wipe from bash command?
I'll save that line (I assume it fills the volume/drive with random bits?)
 
5:38 PM
it have a menu, lists the disks, ask confirmation...
so I heard... never used it, I usually go the linux way, from inside the disk to be killed...
 
You can't wipe the volume you're running on though, right?
 
you can
as soon as dd is loaded to memory and starts running, it can wipe itself just fine
 
dd = dban?
or a regular bash command (delete drive?)
also, do I use rufus/ether for bootUSB?
 
no, dd is a common regular unix command... dban is darik's boot and nuke
dd name came from a joke from IBM JCL language where DD stands for DATA DESCRIPTION...
you can use rufus, unetbootin, or whatever iso-to-usb app you have lying around...
from linux I usually use unetbootin, or dd...
 
Stupid question, are you from Brazil?
 
5:47 PM
yep
not my fault...
 
Hey, Einstein was German
I think ... :o
 
he was... and there's absolutely no issue with that
 
DBAN installation suggests using... drum roll fasten your helmet seatbelt drum roll ...CDBurnerXP!
 
hahaha
get a linux distro, rufus it on the usb drive, reboot, dd, done
 
Yeah I actually just replaced a linux mint
with DBAN which doesnt load
mmmmmmm
why is this so hard
 
6:10 PM
linux MX*
can you elaborate exactly what the command does Im about to launch it
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4M oflag=direct
 
dd - is the killer
if=/dev/zero - gets a stream of zeros
of=/dev/sda - if your hdd is sda, it will be zeroed out
bs=4M - copy 4mb blocks at a time
oflag=direct - write straight to the disk
only make sure /dev/sda IS the disk you want to kill
the rest can be as it is
make really sure, make sure ten times over... once you start, it's too late to regret
 
gotcha
surprising that dd is a standard command
since what version?
 
since the dawn of time...
 
Microsoft doesn't have that (?)
 
it's a unix command, not windows command...
 
6:21 PM
I know
I heard you.
It's my reaction\
 
it may be on WSL on windows, probably
 
wsl?
Oh
 
I don't have any windows with wsl around to test... windows subystem for linux
 
No worries, but yeah, I'm surprised this command exists and is effective at securely erasing data.
and most importantly that it's a standard linux command
there since forever
 
it's not for secure erasing, but can be used to it... it's usually used for converting data, creating partition images, extracting parts of a file...
 
6:24 PM
Right.
 
if you write back a image full of zeroes to a partition, it's a secure erase
 
And you use it to zero out the thing
I'm still very curious about the layer thing
 
layers aren't a thing since the start of the century...
 
Im also reading the same thing.
Welp... I learn from this.
 
6:52 PM
unet stuck on extracting 7th item
 
7:11 PM
Whats a smart way of verifying the drive i need to nuke?
 
fdisk -l
and unplug everything you don't want to erase
 
Even live usb?
 
no, live usb can stay
 
Alright, so, sda is main disk, sdb is usb
command should be identical to what you posted, right?
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4M oflag=direct
Anticipation
I'm waiting on you with finger on the enter key.
AAAAAA
where r uuuu
 
you can do it
it's the command I post
 
7:25 PM
Running...
 
so you are set... one pass is enough... if you want to waste time, run a second one, but I personally never did 2nd pass
 
long pass
still running!
Thank you.
Oh, Thor
The Almighty
AlmighThor
 
7:42 PM
open another terminal, run killall -USR1 dd and you will see how much it already erased
dd will spill out some progress status
on the killall terminal nothing will happen, on the dd terminal there will be a message... repeat as much as you want, it won't disrupt dd
 
killall doesnt delete?
doesnt kill?
(not that it matters)
 
8:00 PM
killall sends the kill signal, the USR1 is a kind of signal that does not kills
*sends the kill signal by default, but you can send another one, and USR1 is a signal that can do anything the developer wants... on the dd case, it will print status messages
 
8:16 PM
I need to sniff Armoury crate software
 
9:15 PM
"kill" is a bit of a misnomer, because what it actually does is send a signal to a process. The default signal is SIGTERM, telling the process to please end. The more brutal variant is SIGKILL, signalling the process that it is now being killed. -USR1 sends the signal SIGUSR1, which just means "some user-defined signal", which in dd's case means "display the progress".
 

« first day (3608 days earlier)      last day (1276 days later) »