> “The gold standard in disk encryption is end-to-end encryption, where only you can unlock your disk. This is what most companies use, and it seems to work well,” says Matthew Green, professor of cryptography at Johns Hopkins University.
How is disk encryption related to end-to-end encryption?
@Derpy So basically a speedrunner, who basically has a disassembly of the entire game in his head, knowing every function in the game in and out
Dude: "Every piece of software has bugs". Journalist: "According to security expert Dude, the NSA is probably intercepting all your data through software bugs"
Anyway, speaking of disk encryption, is it true that you can't have full disk encryption in Windows 10, unless you have a license for PRO? (Win 10 Home, which is what you usually get when you buy a PC/laptop, won't provide full disk encryption).
I don't think it's a matter of choice, encryption nowadays should be by default. It's like HTTPS, it's about time plain HTTP disappears and is blocked by default everywhere
(just a comic strip by Charles M. Shulz. See here. The joke by the was wasn't totally made up because back in school there was a girl that hearing me and another friend of mine talking about Linux actually asked if we were talking about the comics Linus)
@MechMK1 I believe what he wanted to say is that the keys to unlock the disks are in possession of the company owning the disks. It's like the end to end on Signal, for example... Signal does not have your keys, only you and your party.
the next paragraph clarifies that: “There are certainly cases where it’s helpful to have a backup of your key or password. In those cases you might opt in to have a company store that information. But handing your keys to a company like Microsoft fundamentally changes the security properties of a disk encryption system.”
so, if you keep your keys in-company, it's secure... but if you handle out the keys to someone else, you don' own the keys, as the 3rd party may be on the receiving side of a "National Security Letter" and have to silently hand out your keys...
don't backing up your keys on an external entity protects you from that, but make sure to backup your keys offsite... losing the keys is the fastest way to secure wipe an entire datacenter...
I am making 100+ bug bounty tutorials in my channel
hello guys,
I have been working as a cyber security engineer for the last 15 years and decided to make easy YouTube videos for most of QA guys to learn 200+ security issues in 30 hours.
I will be uploading daily two videos
onto a youtube channel...
If his bug bounty videos are just as high quality as his question, I'd say no need to waste that much time
Though imagine a pentest tutorial in the style of an overly loud and obnoxious "YouTuber"
> What's poppin' YouTube? It's ya boi, Zyxx0r1338, back at it again with another video for you guys! This time, we're gonna have a look at buffer overflows and learn how to make easy cash thru bug bounty programs! But first, a word from our sponsor, Raid: Shadow Legends!
And he pronounces his name as "Cy-Zor-thirteen-three-eight"
He's completely made up but damn he annoys me already. Fuck Zyxx0r1338
now you guys got me curious, but I'm not sure how many minutes I should waste watching that stuff. As a noob I bet I'd still learn something new even if it was crap, I guess
@MechMK1 If it is obviously off topic and for a 1 rep user I don't bother with a downvote. I look at downvotes not as a "penalty" but as more of an opportunity for change/learning. The loss of rep hopefully lets the other person know "Someone really disagrees with you - perhaps you should reconsider". As a result I have, in every case, reversed my downvote if the person comes back and reconsiders their position, even if (in the end) they still don't fully agree with me
@ConorMancone I agree completely. Sadly, I don't have a way of really knowing when someone edits their question in a significant way after it was downvoted
To finish my thought though: I don't bother downvoting 1-rep users because most of the time they are drive bys, created the account for this one post, and won't come back ever anyway. As a result there is no real opportunity for improvement, so I wouldn't waste the time or the 1 rep lost (not that I even care about 1 rep)
In that case if it is clearly off topic I'll just VTC and then move on to my life
@MechMK1 Well, to be fair, a good chunk of the time I just downvote and then move on. Often though I'll leave a comment, and so I find out if they come back because they usually respond to my comment.
Usually I downvote and move on when it is just completely wrong and it doesn't seem like there is much hope for improvement. I've found though that if I downvote and comment then, if the user cares, they'll respond and I'll find out
@MechMK1 The concept of email is great. It's just the implementation that leaves things wanting. Although given its very decentralized nature, it might not be practically easy to do better
That is possibly the most useful skill a person can have.
There are only a limited number of problems that you and I can fix, but there are an unlimited number of things that can use fixing. It's best if you know when to move on...
Now I have 2 XKCDs I have to post
@MechMK1 It's time for you to fix it then!
Hmm... already forgot what the other XKCD was that I was reminded of...
No, fixing something is too much work. If you fix it, someone will criticize you for how you fixed it, and how they would have fixed it so much better.
It's much easier to just make snide remarks about how shit everyone else's work is
@MechMK1 If people are wrong and they want to keep wrong, I don't care a bit. No way I will waste time and energy discussing with people that only want to discuss... but if I believe the person is wrong and wants to be better, I take my time. I take A LOT of time...
@ConorMancone I kind of see what you are saying, but this is a question not an answer. So a) you don't lose 1-rep for downvoting, b) downvotes help it to get deleted faster (which is good because it's almost a thinly disguised advertisement), and c) downvotes send a signal which blocks accounts from posting more bad questions.
Note: The Help Center contains articles addressing question bans and answer bans.
Why am I getting this message?
As stated in the tour links on every site, Stack Exchange is a network of question and answer sites, not help forums. This implies that all questions should be objective, answerable, a...
> To avoid bypassing the filter, its internal rules are a secret, but it is partly based on downvotes cast by other members of the communities.