« first day (3466 days earlier)      last day (1712 days later) » 

02:11
Looking back at your own questions from when you were new to SE, how do you feel?
03:02
@JohnZhau I've only asked about 10 questions in 11 years, and I think they all still stand the test of time
 
5 hours later…
08:03
@reed I don't mind questions regarding things that can be used for illicit purposes, such as "How can a buffer overflow lead to RCE?" but what I do consider off-topic are questions that clearly show OP wants to use that knowledge for illicit purposes.
The question in question - no pun intended - was rather obvious that OP wants to do something illicit. And the fact that he went on a bit of a rant when I told him blackhat questions get no support shows me that he is a bit pissed off and not asking for "professional" advice
And even better, his question begins with "if i reach millions of computers with my own program, creating a botnet" - that doesn't exactly make me feel like he is an AV vendor trying to detect botnets.
08:55
@JohnZhau I feel my first questions were shit and they're only slightly less shit now
09:12
Yo!
@MechMK1 On the opposite side of the spectrum are the questions where the OP Is all "I have permission to do this!" or "I'm just learning, I'm not going to use this to hack anyone" questions. I presume that such people are being honest when they say that, but I still find such declarations amusing. I mean, it turns out that the internet is full of people who lie. Do you really expect me to believe you because you said so :)
Although I agree that it mainly comes down to how someone asks. The things that make a question well written have nothing to do with whether or not the underlying question is blackhat or whitehat, so in general I expect you shouldn't be able to tell.
But if someone comes by and has an attitude of "I need help so I can hack this company!" I'll probably downvote and move on
@reed In this case I would have VTC as too broad. Because it is, regardless of whether it is whitehat or blackhat. Having three questions in the title is a bit of a give away there...
@ConorMancone I'd say it all comes down to how exactly the question is phrased? If someone asks about how to exploit a specific vulnerability, and they give enough details to not fall into the off-topic trap, then I honestly believe when someone says "I'm doing this in the scope of a pentest" or "I'm doing this in the scope of a vulnerability lab"
But questions regarding the creation of malware are a bit on knive's edge. The more theoretical the question is, the more likely I am to believe someone they're just trying to understand malware. On the other hand, the more "practical" it is, the more likely I am to believe they're trying to make malware
A question like "How do botnets disguise communication to a central Command and Control server?" seem theoretical enough. "How can I disguise the communication to my Command and Control server?"...not so much.
Also, I have a question, but I am not sure if it's a dupe. The Yubikey Nano is designed to be left inside the device. Doesn't that completely defeat the purpose of a second factor if used for local authentication?
I think the part that matters the most to me is just the question quality. In your example I wouldn't even give it much thought: I'd just answer the question if I knew (and was interested). If for some reason I was suspicious that they meant mischief I would probably move on, although we don't actually have a close reason for "we don't help people hack things"
@MechMK1 That would be my conclusion, but I've never given those much thought (only used a Yubikey once or twice), so maybe I'm missing something?
It would still be just as secure for any online account
But many online accounts are really weird when it comes to 2FA
Google, for example, gives you the option to "remember this device", so you don't need 2FA anymore
Twitter doesn't allow you to use a security key unless you either install their app on your phone or link your phone number
09:28
That was one of my thoughts, although I'm not quite sure how it balances out in the end. There are some competing "gotchas":
1. If the website remembers you forever anyway then having the Yubikey plugged in forever is no less secure than you already are
2. Except that is not true because if you have an ecrypted drive and lock your machine, your active sessions are safe if your computer is stolen. In that case having your Yubikey plugged in forever gives a local thief access to your 2FA
3. However that doesn't help them anyway, because a local thief would still need to steal your username/
Thinking about it some more: The main use case of 2FA is to protect against leaked credentials. The advantage of yubikeys over things like SMS or even TOTP is that a smart phishing page can steal SMS or TOTP codes. Yubikeys are restricted to a given domain, so cannot be phished. Therefore, perhaps the main use case of Yubikeys is protecting against online phishing attacks, in which case leaving it permanently plugged in is perfectly reasonable
I don't even know how to phrase my question.
"What is the risk of having a 2FA key permanently plugged into my device?"
09:49
I have an interesting thought experiment:
If my semi-permanently inserted YubiKey offers protection for my online accounts, but no protection against theft, couldn't laptop and smartphone manufacturers add a U2F key into my mobile devices?
@MechMK1 That's not crazy. It might get flagged as too broad, but it might not. In my brain I'd be wondering "Does having a 2FA key permanently plugged in defeat the purpose of having one?"
@ConorMancone I'd say no, because my password can still be compromised without the account itself being compromised
@MechMK1 If I'm properly understanding the use-case for U2F keys, then that isn't actually a crazy idea. I would add just one layer of security: your phone has to be unlocked for the J2F key to work
@ConorMancone Yes, of course. But it seems like it might actually work. And if the UX becomes good enough, then tying long-term sessions to devices may become more secure
Like, you could have a refresh_token, but only use it together with the 2FA key
And the 2FA key is your device
@MechMK1 To be clear, the U2F key on the device would only work for resources accessed through the phone?
09:58
Yeah. I mean, perhaps there is some weird fringe benefit of using your phone as a 2FA key on your PC, but I think it's not something a lot of people would use
Though...how would you access the account on a device without 2FA support?
I think such a system could only really work if it became "standard" for all devices, e.g. all modern motherboards would come with a 2FA key, just like how TPMs are slowly becoming standard
@ThoriumBR having worked for and in lower tier public administration, I can tell you, that's pretty much the standard - although sill horrifying
@MechMK1 btw, you wanted to come to this
10:14
@TomK. Yes indeed. Since we were just having such a lovely talk about security, it'd be a shame not to immediately swing back to politics, right?
sure, whenever you feel it's the right time
just a friendly reminder
No worries, I did not forget
So specifically regarding HRC, we had her e-Mail dump (which occurred since she conducted government business on her private e-Mail server), which contained some very spicy details regarding unspecified "wetwork" business
@schroeder Hello there, lovely to see you here!
howdy!
Oh yeah, I forgot about the HRC discussion yesterday
hola
10:17
@ConorMancone Wouldn't have wanted to have it without me, would you?
I'm making a personal rule where I won't ever vote for more than one candidate with the same last name as a previous candidate...
@MechMK1 Indeed!
Nepotism is a real thing in US politics and it shouldn't be...
Yes, absolutely, regardless of political party. No Kennedys, no Clintons, no Bushs
I don't want to see the names "Clinton", "Trump", "Bush", or "Obama" again in my lifetime...
Though I would wager another Washington would probably do more good than harm in these times
Definitely not Kennedy...
They can rotate back in after a century...
10:19
@schroeder Also thanks for editing the question. I was not sure if I should have added an image
@ConorMancone oh those poor "Smiths"...
so that's why HRC is worse than Trump, because she has the same name as her husband who was president years before her. But Trump who installed his daughter and his son in law in the white house, and whose sons are heavily invested in the GOP doesn't participte in Nepotism?
Meh, nepotism is a bad thing. But growing up around the political machine does give one insight and effectiveness in operating the machine.
@schroeder :) Last name here is just a stand in for family relationship. I wouldn't apply the rule to two completely unrelated Smiths
HRC had an incredible amount of experience and is qualified. Arguably more so than her husband (I'm not a HRC voter)
10:21
@schroeder There is some truth to that, and some amount of nepotism in any industry is inevitable
not to mention that HRC was senator of New York and secretary of state and had her own political career
@schroeder My argument is that while HRC is inarguably more experienced and qualified than Trump, she is in my opinion magnitudes more corrupt than Trump. I personally see Trump like a little toddler, who doesn't know what he is doing and just enjoys doing bad things because it provokes a reaction from his parents.
he is still enforcing a massive right wing policy programme in the united states, although he might seem like a crazy person
@TomK. I can't help but think that you insist on misunderstanding my views. I never said that HRC is worse than Trump. I have said that Trump is likely "worse" in all regards. My point is only that she is by no means innocent or a good candidate. She was, without question, well aware of her husband's sex crimes and continued to not just standby him and support him but actively destroy the careers of his victims when they tried to speak up.
while enriching himself and his family on a crazy scale
10:24
@TomK. I don't see right-wing policy as a bad thing per se, though I do consider his personal enrichment reprehensible
Is she as bad as the men who actually victimize women? No. But should she be considered "the woman's candidate"? Absolutely not.
@ConorMancone You didn't say that, no. I'm not referring to you when I'm asking that. ;)
@ConorMancone I agree with the point you are making here.
I did refer to HRC as worse than Trump, and I stick to it. I still consider that an incompetent and corrupt politician is not as bad as a competent and corrupt politician.
Because the more competent you are, and the deeper your ties into the political underground go, the more you can exploit the system for your own benefit.
@MechMK1 In what ways is Trump corrupt: US military forces had to stay in Trump hotels and resorts, secret service has to pay money to stay at mar a lago, diplomats and other envoys of foreign states can book rooms in Trump tower for ludicrous prices - and do not stay there
@MechMK1 I would agree with that sentiment in general, but I don't know enough about the specifics to take a strong stance for the two people in question. I have seen lots of rumors about the kind of corruption that HRC participated in, and while I tend to suspect the accusations are accurate, I don't know enough myself to conclude for sure. In my book she is already a terrible candidate that I would never vote for anyway, so it doesn't really matter
10:29
Trump Tower in Moscow, infrastructure projects in Saudi Arabia and China... yadda yadda yadda
My overall impression of both is that their main concern is increasing their own wealth and influence, but I don't know enough specifics about them to conclude much more than that.
@TomK. That doesn't really counter my point in any way. I know Trump is corrupt. Everybody knows.
Although HRC has one thing going for her: she retired. That era of US politics seems to finally be coming to a close, and we're all better off for it
You are saying HRC is more or equally corrupt than Trump is, but you are showing zero evidence.
I still find it strange that Trump decided to go GOP. He could have just as easily run as a Democrat. I would have thought that would be more his style...
10:31
@TomK. Like the Uranium One "controversy", you mean?
@ConorMancone Didn't he once run as a democrat candidate?
@MechMK1 I remember a great skeptics question related to this... (wonder if I can find it)
According to Wikipedia:
> Trump's political party affiliation changed numerous times. He registered as a Republican in Manhattan in 1987, switched to the Reform Party in 1999, the Democratic Party in 2001, and back to the Republican Party in 2009.
That was easy:
31
Q: Is this picture of Trump, Bloomberg, and Clinton playing golf real?

Evan Carroll Picture reads "it's big club and you ain't in it", and has Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump, Michael Bloomberg, and Clinton. That's quite similar to this tweet of the same Image without the caption by Glenn Greenwald

@MechMK1 right, it's a controversy..
I interpreted this question as, "Trump is such a staunch republican, there's no way he would hang out with Democrats, right???". Sorry: that is not an accurate understanding of Trump
I think he would have run for whatever party gave him the best chance of winning. He's smart enough that he chose well...
10:34
@TomK. And you think that there is nothing to it? Investigations are still active as of today, and I highly doubt they would still be active if there was nothing to it
@ConorMancone Trump isn't even a republican
He's just a shitposter
Yeah, it's not like Bill Barr is known to fabricate fake investigations or drop an investigation if needed..
But even if, then there's are 1 story - which I don't know the details of - but Trump has 100 stories.
@MechMK1 If you are a shitposter, you shouldn't run for president..
then there are "the emails", a topic which has been widely discussed. HRC was before two (?) committees, answered questions for 10 hours and no wrongdoing has been found.
@TomK. I wouldn't, though my political platform, if I would decide to still run, would involve legalizing marijuana, psilocybin, lsd, machine guns and .50 BMG rifles; requiring teaching students how to properly conduct a phone call and write an e-Mail, require every student to watch "The Matrix" and "Pulp Fiction", and make public littering punishable by public whipping
"cool"
what an edgy thing to say
I think too many teenagers don't know how to write a proper e-Mail, and that needs to change
you are my grandpa and a libertarian at the same time
10:39
I assume your grandpa also enjoys The Matrix and Pulp Fiction?
@TomK. That sounds like the best compliment ever. Then again I'm a libertarian and also 50% grumpy old man...
no, but he complains about teenagers a lot
"the state shouldn't interfere in my choices!"
I would rather put the blame on the education system, which does very little to educate on relevant skills. We still go by the "You won't have a calculator on your hand at all times" doctrine
"the state should interefere in the choices of teenagers, because they can't write a god-darn email!"
If you consider writing a bad e-Mail a "choice", sure. They can choose to write a bad e-Mail. But in order to choose, you need to have the ability to also write a good e-Mail
It's not much of a choice if you only know one way
For example, when I went to school, I was taught how to write a formal letter on a typewriter. This was absolutely obsolete, and a complete waste of everybody's time
10:43
have you ever thought about the possibility of you being wrong?
@TomK. I don't need to, you do that for me.
If instead I was taught how to phrase and format a decent professional e-Mail, a lot more people would have learned a more valuable practical skill
the worst emails I get are from seniors and from people who think they know everything. the nicest and kindest emails are from juniors and young people who are just starting out.
I believe you. A lot of seniors just don't care about proper form anymore. However, when I get an e-Mail that literally starts with "Yo, what's up?" in a professional context, then I feel like someone failed
And, while I cannot say for sure, I doubt that it was a senior addressing me like that
mabe they just want to be friends?
or think that you are the same age as you?
or thought you were someone else?
or wanted to make a joke?
or maybe want to make work a little less pain in the ass?
@TomK. if I would have exchanged dozens of e-mails with said person, it would have been different. However, when my e-Mail was addressed like "Sehr geehrter Herr <last name>" and he replies with "Yo, wie läufts?", I feel like that's not proper discourse
10:48
all these emails that start with:
"Dear ladies and gentlemen,
may I bring the following item to your attention:.."
dude.. relax
Relax in which way?
I'm talking about the hypothetical person that writes "Sehr geehrte Herr"
in this case .. you?
I think in a professional context, especially with a stranger, one can expect being addressed politely
There's a difference between speaking to a professional contact and my bro on teamspeak
sure
but there's a difference between work and a funeral, isn't there?
How is it like a funeral to address a stranger politely?
10:51
I don't want to put a stick up my ass every time I write an email
but - of course - I understand there are different flavors and people want to get adressed differently
I don't. In fact, addressing people in a polite and friendly way isn't difficult at all for me
@TomK. HAHAHA, don't work in the UK, then. Whoooo boy!
@schroeder hahaha
Not just sticks but different kinds of sticks with layers of nuance. Been here 4 years and still haven't worked it all out
And if I have spoken to a person several times, and they want to offer a more informal tone, I would happily agree and be more informal. But formal and polite is the default tone in a professional environment in my opinion
10:53
all I want to say, you shouldn't - or at least I wouldn't - get all worked up, if someone adressed me in an "improper" way
I don't get worked up about it, nor would I ever "correct" someone on it (which would be very impolite to do anyways), but I think my part about it
@schroeder yah, I heard that the UK has a very different work environment
weirdly the british infosec community seems to be rather active
I ended an email to colleagues with "Regards" instead of "Kind regards" and people called me up to tell me to calm down. I still don't know why I need to have an ending salutation at all...
lol
@schroeder "Mit freundlichen Grüßen" is the de-facto standard for an ending salutation
"Hochachtungsvoll" is...damn, I don't even know anyone where I would use that. Too polite for anyone
10:56
Internal signature ->
"Viele Grüße
Tom"
no last name, nothing else
Yeah, internally I just use "Lg," unless I write to the CEO or such
@MechMK1 standard endings are fine. You can template that. But here, oh no, you need to consider and use just the correct forms of greeting and endings, and you cause problems if you get it wrong. And there is no guide ...
wtf
@schroeder German is a lot simpler in that regard, since these two beginnings and endings are pretty much default for 99% of communication
10:57
lemme guess, you work in government?
@MechMK1 as is the case in North America.
@TomK. nope
weeeeird
"Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren" (Dear Ladies and Gentlemen) if you don't know who you are addressing and "Sehr geehrte/r Frau/Herr (Dr./Mag./etc.)" if you know who you're addressing
Some people with a doctor insist on being referred to by their title
Others don't care
@MechMK1 haha, those people (8
10:59
hehe - I work with a lot of universities. The Drs care
@TomK. In all honesty, if someone goes through the trouble of writing a doctor thesis, I can go through the trouble of writing "Dr." or "Doktor"
@MechMK1 ditto
my professor in accounting had a lot of titles. Prof. Dr. Mag., etc...
but in my circles, they do not always identify themselves as "Dr." -- you have to know
and if you get it wrong ...
@schroeder Hopefully you can at least look it up
11:01
it's all kinds of fucked up
My accounting professor never used his titles on any document, except on his drivers license. He said "If your titles are longer than your name, and the police stops you, they speak quite differently to you"
@schroeder Yeah. Though the worst offenders in my opinion are the Magisters and Magistras
2 months after moving here, I described the culture as "Downton Abbey with cellphones". Oh, the classism. And they truly believe they put their classism behind them.
No matter how simple a form is, they will fill it out wrong, while then telling you that it must be your fault.
@schroeder "No no, i would never think I am better than one of those plebs who don't even have a PhD"
A simple form, asking for your first name, last name, employee id, phone number, bank account number and what kind of parking tariff you would like to have
11:04
@MechMK1 yeah, that's it
except extend that throughout the culture, not just the universities
In the field "Employee ID", there was already: The car license plate, the phone number of their spouse, the phone number of the IT hotline from a sticker on their desktop, the room number of their office and, my personal favourite, the number of the parking spot they would like to have
LOL
yeah, that sounds familiar
Whenever I see someone do something exceptionally dumb in an expensive car, I automatically say "Must be a Magister"
I mean, I absolutely believe that these people know their stuff in their area of expertise (or at least, I want to believe that), but being unable to fill out a clearly labelled form, even with fill-out instructions...that's a big oof from me
Though one thing that I really dislike is when some Dr.s and Mag.s believe the rules don't apply to them because of their status. For example, in order to park in the employee garage, you need to put a transponder on the inside of the windshield. This transponder is put on there with an adhesive foil.
And tons and tons of Dr.s and Mag.s were like "No I don't like seeing this on my windshield. Can't we put it on a piece of clear plastic so I can put it away?"

"no, it's designed that way so people can't use any car and actually have to use the car they registered."

"That's unacceptable! There must be another way"
11:57
1
Q: Essential / popular TAXII feeds

ElhitchTAXII feeds are a great addition to a monitoring solution such as a SIEM. However, to my knowledge, there are only three distinct openly available providers: Hail A TAXII OTX Limo What other threat feeds based on TAXII/STIX are available?

Is this on-topic? It seems like a product/service recommendation to me
@TomK. You know what I get worked up over? When people misspell my name when responding to an email from me, because between my email address and my name (which I always sign on the bottom) they should know exactly how to spell my name!
Specifically my first name: it's an uncommon spelling of a common name. I never expect people to spell it right if they just hear it, but it's ridiculous to misspell someone's name when they have already spelled it for you
@ConorMancone Oh, come on Connnor!
(to be fair, I don't actually get worked up over it - just mildly irritated)
lol :)
yeah, I get that. that's just.. kinda rude
Although I'm also the kind of person who will copy-and-paste international names to make sure that I get all the accented characters correct
12:05
@MechMK1 falls under "what product/service does X?"
I've gotten some weird ones to: Connor (not a surprise), Conner (kinda weird), Conr (I think that person just doesn't know how to spell) and Corner (I mean, come on!). I also get Hunter a lot when it is over the phone
@ConorMancone I am 100% sure that I at least once have called you Connor and I'm sorry
@schroeder That's hilarious (well, it wouldn't be if it happened to me)
If you did I wouldn't have noticed or cared. Completely different!
@schroeder That was not my experience (I have a PhD in the sciences and so spent a lot of time with Drs). Although we always made fun of liberal arts professors and said that they always wanted to be called "Dr", because when you have a meaningless degree it's that much more important to get everything you can out of it
90% of the people I knew though didn't care about the title. I'm sure thought that YMMV. (I'm not actually sure Drs in the soft sciences care more about being called "Dr", but that is the story we stuck with anyway)
3 of my best friends have PhDs and do everything to hide it, because it would be extremely embarassing to be seen as someone who wants to be seen as someone, who gets adressed with the title
one of them is a professor and only tell people - when they ask what this person does for a living - that they "teach at a college".
My PhD is not relevant to my work, so it pretty much never comes up. I only bring it out when it is helpful (mainly just job applications when it is at all relevant). I do hang my diplomas up in my office though. It took a decade to get them all, so I figure I might as well do something with them.
12:15
okay, radical topic switch, if I may
here's a work conundrum:
There's a senior colleague who gave a project to me. I firmly evaluated the project goals and wrote up a 3-page thing with a TL;DR that says "The project goals do not work with the chosen methodology and in the circumstances. This project should be abandoned".
The senior answered saying:
"Hi Tom
**You can't be serious!**
I told you, if you have questions, ask me first!
**This is unacceptable**"

My answer:
"Hey,
I'm sorry if I missed something, let's talk tomorrow (today)."
My college actually had a BOGO program for my undergrad work, so I actually have 4 degrees. I point this out mainly because I think a BOGO for a bachelor's degree is hilarious
no answer, no meeting set, no call. should I engage?
@TomK. Where did you share your findings?
in a pdf attached to the email
But, with other people or just with the colleague?
12:17
sent to the senior and another person who initiated the project
@TomK. I'd say yes. A call, perhaps with a request to make a meeting. 30-60 minutes or such, depending on the scope, to discuss your findings.
When you say, "Gave the project to me", as in asked for an evaluation, or "Okay Tom, you need to be charge of this now"
@ConorMancone the latter
but when I have to be in charge of something, I have to evaluate it first
If it was assigned to me then I would probably just bring it up with whoever is responsible for prioritizing my work. "Hi [line manager or whatever], I'm supposed to be working on this project. I reviewed it and I think we should just let it die. Here are my conclusions. Do you want me to actually work on this thing?"
12:21
so... yeah.. dunno
I usually try not to ruffle the feather's of my coworker, but if the coworker in question is no longer responsible for the service then it doesn't really matter what their opinion is
interesting
@ConorMancone I deal with Admin Drs, not academic/research Drs ... Most research Drs I know don't give a crap. But if they run a uni ...
So if they didn't reach out to me again I might leave it, but I might reach out simply to see if I could help them move past their irritation at me.
so yeah, we have this matrix organization here, and this person is only responsible for some of my skill-specific assignments
I like your approach
but it could be seen as a bad move as well, because I'm kinda going over this person's head
while just calling them and clearing things up might be easier
or just ignoring everything.... (this project ist honestly just so stupid)
12:25
@TomK. That sort of thing is always the tricky part, and that definitely wasn't a consideration in my suggestion, so...
why I'm hesitant @MechMK1 about your sugesstion, is the tone of the email, there were several parts that were just in bold! like the "You can't be serious!". I mean.. wtf?
that's what keeps me from having a 1on1 meeting
@TomK. I understand your hesitation, but I think a personal discussion may actually be in your favour. People are more hesitant to be openly hostile in person, and on a phonecall or an e-Mail. It's easier to be angry to text on your screen or a voice on a phone than to a person standing across you.
ah yeah, shoulda been more clear: it would of course be via skype/zoom/whatever
but I think your logic still applies
Ah yes, I forgot that most meetings are still via conference call.
Still, if I were in your situation, I'd ask for a meeting to get some clarification and perhaps explain my reasoning
okay, I think I will probably take both your approaches. Talk to my line manager first, then talk to the senior - and maybe have some additional arguments in the backpoint
12:32
Good luck with that. I hope you can get it resolved in a productive way
I just bought 60 packs of Nissin Demae Ramen Sesame Flavour
I am going to die from a heart attack, aren't I?
@MechMK1 yep
What if I eat those 60 noodles over the course of 2 years? That's one pack every 12 days or so
I'm thinking the salt levels will spike your blood pressure and give you a stroke. Anyone who is pulling for a heart attack: want to put odds on it?
12:41
Plus knowing my girlfriend she'll probably eat half of it anyways, even though she doesn't like sesame flavour
I've recently developed a love affair with sesame
@ConorMancone I'll bet 100 € on my survival for the next 2 years. Should I die, ask my accountant for the money
@ConorMancone Sesame is amazing!
Tahini based dressings, sesame bagels, roasted sesame seeds on dishes.... yum....
It doesn't matter if it fucks up my teeth. Sesame is still healthier than meth.
0
Q: Asymmetric encryption that preserves the plaintext size

Rig0LI'm looking for an asymmetric encryption algorithm that preserves the size of the thong in clear text. The encrypted file must not be longer than the plaintext file and must not contain any special characters. Do you have any ideas?

"string" => "thong" is my new favorite translation hickup.
2
13:00
Reminds me of "To a non-programmer, string and thread refer to the same thing."
2
I forgot where I picked that up though
@MechMK1 it took me a minute of parsing, but I think that's what was meant
@schroeder I assumed "thong" was some kind of cryptographic thing I haven't heard of. But your translation to string makes more sense
I would never guess "thong" was "string"
@ThoriumBR that just means your wardrobe is not as interesting as mine.
3
like @MechMK1 I was thinking about a crypto structure that I never heard of... people gives strange names to things
thinking about my wife's wardrobe it makes more sense
13:17
@ConorMancone if you are into Tahini, I recommend can Ottolenghi cookbooks. they are full of recipes with extra tahini sauce on top
14:01
@schroeder I would like to unsubscribe from this mental image.
EU has a right to be forgotten, but not a right to forget.
:D
Quick, I need motivation to write a report in the next hour that I should have finished on wednesday already
14:20
@MechMK1 unfortunately a IOT shock collar would take too long to ship.... :D
@JourneymanGeek As soon as my head turns right to look at the DMZ I'd be shocked?
Hmm, that sounds like it could work
Its IOT. its reasonably likely it'll get hacked so who knows
okay, @ConorMancone your approach went okay-ish. my line manager brought the senior into the call after I explained the situation to him and then moderated a weirdly tense 3-person call.
14:40
Ah yes, the truxican standoff. I hope you came to an agreeable conclusion
14:54
not sure, the senior kinda implicitly told my line manager that I'm having trouble figuring out, what the project goals are and whatnot, so basically saying: Tom isn't competent enough, that's why he handled this the wrong way
true management skills you'd expect from someone with seniority
no engagement on a technical level from their side, no real arguments
I'm leaving this place soon, so, I just want to get this over with
Ah, I was wondering if this was already on your new job or not
 
1 hour later…
16:00
Is Windows Defender recommended for SOHO/SMB?
The Norton subscription at the office is expiring soon and apparently it's up to me to figure out what to replace it with.
from what I hear defender is quite good
but as with all AV solutions nowadays: it's only really good if you use the version that has a cloud connection
the question you should be asking yourself: do you need an AV application?
That is the definitely a good question
Most of the users aren't tech-savvy. But there are certain types of industry-specific legacy applications that they need to use.
As in, they have to download software from non HTTPS websites
There's been one BEC since I've been around, and possibly one before (I can't remember).
BEC?
Business Email Compromise
One of the executives started getting replies from people asking him about a weird email he was sending out.
16:20
BEC is a very lucrative scam...
in its various forms... a Russian gang, IIRC, compromised lots of execute's emails and basically ran an insider trading operation
and sold the information
 
2 hours later…
18:25
@TomK. Why are they giving you a new project to be responsible for when you are leaving? That's a terrible idea... Presumably they will just have to re-train someone else on it after you leave.
19:20
@ConorMancone maybe the project is finishing, or they want to abandon the project and toss it at Tom because when he leaves, they can tell the client they will need to start over, because Tom left with all data, and it will cost more and take more time...

« first day (3466 days earlier)      last day (1712 days later) »