« first day (1923 days earlier)      last day (3255 days later) » 

11:00
wat
Politics and military are two different things and terrorism is almost always politically motivated.
terrorism is not about politics.
@AviD I think @bilbo_pingouin 's point was that by being close to the EU, they are "striking at the heart" of the "infidel", showing they can strike anywhere including not far from the capital.
or, usually not
However, I disagree they suck at their aim. They're aiming at public transport, to inspire fear in people going outside and living their normal lives.
11:01
@diagprov which would be the point of terrorism, yes. Still not politics or military though.
@diagprov exactly this.
Same for the restaurants and concerts. These are things normal people do. The message is "you are not safe".
@diagprov I think he was saying that they suck at maximizing kill rate, IF that was their aim, which he is saying it wasnt.
@AviD indeed.
Yup. "You should live in fear because we are more powerful than any defense you might have."
@AviD I think blowing up the airport and a subway station during peak hours counts as a very good aim for maximizing death rate.
Adi
Adi
@AviD What the actual fucK?!
Why the fuck are you twisting my words?
11:04
If it isn't about politics, and just about killing as many people as they can, then, why don't they attack Hong Kong? Highest density of population.
@Adi hehe, keep reading...
Adi
Adi
@AviD I mean it's not unexpected from you. Create a false scenario in your head and start assuming.
and sometimes I do it just to wind you up...
Adi
Adi
@AviD I won't. If you wanted, you could have corrected yourself.
@Adi pfft, no, not at all...
@Adi I DID
Adi
Adi
11:04
Mmhm
7 mins ago, by AviD
@Arperum why is he saying that?
which was referring to
7 mins ago, by Arperum
@AviD He is saying it absolutely wasn't.
7 mins ago, by AviD
as in, why does it need to be said?
7 mins ago, by AviD
isnt it painfully obvious to anyone?
@bilbo_pingouin they're in a severely asymmetric warfare situation. In a straight up fight, they'd lose very thoroughly. So their tactics are guerilla and their overall aim is influence.
and screw you for making me quote myself so much :P
@diagprov actually, guerilla tactics are different from terror tactics.
and more actually, their short term aim IS terror.
@AviD on that, we agree at least.
terror is a mean to achieve a political aim. Not an end. Believing that they are a bunch of dumb psychopaths trying to kill as many people is exposing yourself to a lot of problems.
@bilbo_pingouin welcome to the 1970s.
Terror is not always - or even, usually not - about a achieving a political aim.
Adi
Adi
11:09
@AviD Mmmhm
It is more often about achieving a religious one.
Adi
Adi
I agree
@AviD that's true, I'm just making an analogy really. The key point being they're after influence of some kind.
Adi
Adi
@AviD Okay, I disagree
@Adi oh?
11:10
@AviD denying that there's an ulterior motive is... well, I can't find a nice enought word... not wise.
I'm not talking about personal reasons - I'm talking about the overall organizational cause.
Adi
Adi
Jihadi terrorism aims to create chaos, disrupt cohesion, increase polarization.
@bilbo_pingouin oh there IS an ulterior motive. It's just not a political one.
It depends how you define "political aim" and we probably have different views on this.
that view is hopelessly naive.
Adi
Adi
11:11
It's not a religious goal
It's a very pragmatic one
@Adi ah, I was using the word loosely.
I did not mean "This is the way of Islam" - but more like "BRING ON THE END OF THE WORLD"
politics != ideology... so politics can be very pragmatic
Adi
Adi
@AviD I probably agree more on the first statement than the second
The chaos is not the goal
@Adi again, using it as an example
Adi
Adi
But rather a mean to achieve the goal
11:13
not that they really wnat to end the world
@Adi which is?
Adi
Adi
@AviD I don't believe so
@AviD Control. Power.
Self determination
@Adi how's that not politics?
@Adi neither do I, but they do want to end the current state of the world. Bring on a new world order, so to speak.
Adi
Adi
@AviD Mmm.. yeah, could be. I think that's a good middle ground that I can agree with
@bilbo_pingouin if the EU were to cede to their political demands - would the terror stop? This is a key test to the political question.
Adi
Adi
11:15
@bilbo_pingouin I think here we have another semantics issue
As what "political terror" means
no, I think we disagree on what politics mean
Adi
Adi
Control and power and self determination are politics
I think we both agree on that
and didn't you say that was the goal?
Adi
Adi
Indeed
right then, I'll let you lot sort out the semantics... I have work to catch up on.
Adi
Adi
11:17
But I'd argue (from the same point of view as @AviD's) that it's not political terror
so, you just disagree with me on principle ground that you don't like me? (sad face)
lol noooo @Adi would NEVAR do that :P
note to @Adi: yes I AM kidding.
Adi
Adi
:D
your favourite manatee has arrived
I only know one manatee and he's not even my favorite.
2
Adi
Adi
11:23
@silverpenguin That's a bold claim
@Adi well I was going on the basis that you know no other manatees and therefore by default i am your favourite but @Simon has to be canadian and ruin my life
If this ruins your life, you gotta reconsider a few things.
@Simon man i just about decided what to have for lunch and i have the same thing every day clearly considering things is not my strong suit....
@Simon how you been anyway have not seen much of you the last week
@silverpenguin Good, good, I was a tiny bit busier than usual, yourself?
@Simon same surprisingly getting my javascript on... kind of effort...
11:30
Make sure to not get trapped into the claws of the various JS frameworks and you should be fine.
@Simon lol nah fuck that im just using good ol raw js... dont see whats wrong with just using normal OOP rather than exstensive frameworks
Terrorism is marketing.
Marketing is terrorism.
Sales is missionaries.
donuts are cakes
but not all cakes are donuts
@silverpenguin whooo, close to the metal, eh?
11:37
I mean that AQMI and ISIS need troops and thus fight each other for the European market.
@ThomasPornin lol
Each successful bombing brings more volunteers.
Mmh, AQMI is the French acronym.
@AviD no metal, just rockin and rollin
@ThomasPornin da fuk is AQMI?
mainly rocking....and sobbing
11:40
hmm. I was sure that level of snark would be obvious.
@Simon al qeada mission impossible
@silverpenguin I feel like you got the first 2 words right.
@Simon Al-Qaeda au Maghreb Islamique
@bilbo_pingouin do I still get the toaster?
@Simon AQIM in English.
11:41
@silverpenguin should ask Simon...
@Simon toaster pls
That wouldn't help me considering that I've never heard of it in English either but cheers bilbo.
@Simon the AQ branch operating in North and West Africa
Shootings one year ago in France were from Al Qeada Yemen, which is close to AQIM.
AQ is a franchise... so there are a few variants of it
11:43
Did not know that.
Yet I don't feel like this is necessary to know.
@ThomasPornin actually, those are called AQPA in French (Al Qaeda dans la Peninsule Arabique)
And AQ is not in good terms with ISIS
How surprising.
In fact they tend to shoot at each other in Syria and Lybia.
That's great.
11:46
@ThomasPornin and then the US will fund a group to fight them and then they will become the new terrorists
IIRC they have kind of declared war on each other.
You need to know such details if you want to go beyond tbe "terrorism is bad" reflex.
Because knowing this translates to "terrorism is good"?
am I the only one who gets confused between islamic state and the international space station ? people need to stop using acronyms
4
Adi
Adi
@ThomasPornin and Yemen
and Afghanistan
In fact, they committed a few horrific acts against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan
Like.. horrific horrific
11:48
@silverpenguin ISIS != ISS..; see there's an I missing...
Adi
Adi
@silverpenguin Use the generally agreed on insulting term "Daesh"
@Adi why insulting?
that's how they call themselves...
Adi
Adi
@bilbo_pingouin It's not how they call themselves
@bilbo_pingouin Because it's the acronym in Arabic, which sounds a lot like a hooligan opening a door in a very barbaric manner, or like stepping on something in a very barbaric manner
They don't like it
@Adi In particular because ISIS failed at becoming a "state"
@bilbo_pingouin Im not dumb, just lazy :P I skim and i get confused
Adi
Adi
11:51
Plus, acronyms aren't really a big thing in the Arabic language
@ThomasPornin The Taliban were a lot more successful at it (still failed, but a lot more successful)
The Taliban made the wise choice of making a lot fewer enemies than ISIS has made
@Adi the taliban hoped to be a legitimate government in one place.
ISIS wants to take over a big chunk of the world by force
ok it's an acronym of how they call themselves... but derogatory. Fair enough.
@ThomasPornin Looks like you'll be getting 15-20 cm of snow on Thursday too.
Adi
Adi
@bilbo_pingouin They even no longer call themselves ISIS. Just IS
Which is confusing as fuck
You can also call em Daeshbags....
Adi
Adi
11:54
@JourneymanGeek Yup. There's that as well
Turns out invading another country isn't very easy
@Adi which is also due to different aims. The Taliban, took the power in an already existing country, with a support of a foreign power. IS aims at some place in between two countries...
@JourneymanGeek In fact they wanted to be a government, but it did not work and they had to revert to "terrorist group" to keep recruiting.
@ThomasPornin they don't really have interests outside afganistan, no?
Adi
Adi
@ThomasPornin I think you bring up a very good point
It's difficult to recruit for jihad when there's no jihad to jihad
@ThomasPornin it's partly doubtful as some of their founders were AQ members. But yeah, they do need to recruit.
It's hard to get competent employees these days...
and they have quite some turnover
11:58
@Adi That's what I mean. Bombs in Brussels or Paris are a marketing operation.
Adi
Adi
@bilbo_pingouin The founders of what?
@ThomasPornin Yup. And a European racism reaction is the perfect thing they want.
Adi
Adi
@ThomasPornin A senior Al Qaeda member "Abu Obaida Abdulla Al Adam" has an audio series called "Creation of Terrorism". He mentions exactly that point.
Multiple smaller "victories" bring more recruited than one big "victory' and a long period of stagnation
Adi
Adi
Probably a non-onebox link is good enough
But yeah, Al Qaeda never really took a liking of AQI
12:03
@Adi You could flag it as "offensive"
Adi
Adi
In fact, in the jihadi circles, it was known that almost all Al Qaeda branches hated Abu Mus'ab Al Zarkawi
He was one of the very few Al Qaeda leaders who aren't educated
He was one of the very few with long criminal thug history
They hated him because he "lacked class"
It's very ridiculous to say that
:D
@SmokeDispenser Wow, this is probably the first time that I see this in 10 years.
Adi
Adi
@Simon What is it?
@Adi "re"
Adi
Adi
12:06
I don't know what's that
Looked it up
@Simon yeah. I might be old.
It is worth reading about "The Global Islamic Resistance Call" by Abu-Musab al-Suri... to see how they want to use terror to create a civil war to get more supporters.
Adi
Adi
@bilbo_pingouin Indeed it's a good book
I wonder where that guy is these days
So what do you think about the FBIs about face?
Adi
Adi
@AstroDan I don't think that sentence was in English
12:16
@AstroDan, do you ask us what we think about the 'outside party' and their claim?
well, could be possible, who knows:)
@SmokeDispenser It might be an out-of-"court" settlement
Honestly I was surprised that they delayed the court date.
Morning everyone.
I thought that the FBI would use Belgium as leverage.
That is, Apple and the FBI agreeing to do the unlocking discreetly, without compromising their respective postures.
12:20
@ThomasPornin, that'd be horrible for apple if it got public.
@ThomasPornin Maybe. However if it ever got out it would make apple look very bad.
@AstroDan I really am interested to who stepped forward to help the FBI
I doubt they would go for such high risks
It will somehow
@JukEboX John McAfee !
12:20
@JukEboX I wonder if this may be the action of another TLA (three letter agency)
Someone will talk about it in their E-Mail and it will get hacked by whoever
@ThomasPornin No way
Or it will be pulled out via FOIA
@AstroDan you men the PLA :P
@JukEboX So what you're saying is that there is no way companies can keep secrets?
@JukEboX that's why the collaboration would be such high risk.
12:21
@JukEboX Peoples Liberation Army?
@Simon I am sure they can.... for a time.
Why haven't we seen the source code for iOS then?
Adi
Adi
What was that Generals army?
The one made out of Iranian and Russian elements
@Simon wha?
@AstroDan yup. They have been making counterfit everything for decades. Who is to say that they haven't reverse engineered a way in and sold it to a company or the FBI for $$$$$
12:23
Probably got the @MarkBuffalo, in his job at the NSA, to crack it
Adi
Adi
Oh yeah, Global Liberation Army
@SmokeDispenser If companies can only keep secrets "for a time", why hasn't there been a leak for their closed source software?
@Simon, there has been.
Oh really, the entire source code for an iOS version is available somewhere?
@JukEboX If they cracked Apples encrypt they could make WAY more money keeping it a secret
12:24
@Simon, Also, you are talking about a huge amount of data vs. a very small amount.
@Simon no. But other closed source has been leaked.
@AstroDan it is a win/win for both if it works so the issue is dropped by not for Apple since they are going to freak out about it
I absolutely don't believe in ultimate secrecy but I do believe that they'd be able to pull off something like unlocking the device without leaking their action.
I really don't think apple can force code in a way around their encryption especially in a ROM already flashed to the phone without reflashing and nuking the phone
There's a ton of shady shit that some companies are involved into that we never get to know.
@Simon right.. until the press puts up enough money.
12:27
@SmokeDispenser you mean the "Corporate" government controlled media?
@Simon, or the person that did it get's a bad feeling about it and runs to wikileaks
@SmokeDispenser or they get screwed by the government and runs the wikileaks
@Simon or until it involves the government and the FOIAS start flying.
@SmokeDispenser after violating their NDA and then there is an arrest warrant issued for their arrest and they hide out in a Guatamalan embassy
After all these years, no one has been able to figure out why did the chicken cross the road. This is a perfect example of what I'm saying.
12:28
@Simon To get away from Colonel Saunders
Yeah I wouldn't want to be turned into KFC if I were a chicken.
@Simon The point is valid, though: such a hidden action means that the involved personnel becomes a huge liability.
@ThomasPornin Sure, hence why I don't believe in "ultimate" secrecy but I bet they could pull it off anyway.
The key of success surely is to involve the least people as possible.
@Simon There is no doubt that they could, but whether they would is another thing.
Mhm.
12:31
In that while secrecy can be achieved, it is not guaranteed.
What's the deal with the bruteforce protection on the device anyway, after X attempts, you can't make another one for the next 30 seconds or something?
@Simon After 10 the device is erased.
@AstroDan I assume this is optional but the bad dudes did activate it?
Hum I thought they were limited to 4 digits.
Looks like they really do need Apple's help then.
@Simon 10 failed attempts = nuked
@Simon no, arbitrary length is possible to use for quite a while
12:35
@JukEboX With the important caveat that the code that decides the nuking is outside of the tamper-resistant part of the chip.
@ThomasPornin I think Apple should refuse to help the FBI.
@JukEboX The security system on the iPhone case is a bit flaky (because of the "outside of the tamper-resistant part") so the FBI should have already broken through it, Apple or no Apple.
Thus, it is no longer a question of "help".
o
Then they could pull off the good ol' "You've already cheated once, what's the issue with doing it once more?".
finally, I knew I would use a fast food place enough that eventually I would just lean over, use the till (american erm...checkout?? ) my self and tell them i ordered my regular and il be back in 15 mins
@silverpenguin A reasonable translation. However in the case of fast food Register or Cashier may be more appropriate.
12:45
@AstroDan You're a reasonable translation.
@AstroDan they need an english to fake english dictionary... there is an english barrier between english and the americans
I wouldn't dare to call it a barrier.
It's just that you speak with a dumb accent.
@Simon s/dumb/sexy
@silverpenguin Last time I was in England I wish that I had one of those. That UK fake English can be a pain.
@AstroDan D: you are one of them...
12:49
@silverpenguin, nope I speak real (American) English :)
user image
4
^says it all really
Shut top separatist.
@Simon shut top rebellious ex-colonist
:OOOOO
@RоryMcCune Possibly historical enemy ex-colonist!
12:52
@RоryMcCune the satisfaction this image brings to me is almost perverted
ew
and lets all just remember that James I of Britain was a Scottish king first :)
I'm eating pistachios and some of them required a damn doctorate to open their shell. I wouldn't last long in wild either.
@Simon im surprised you made it this far either way! ;) <3
pls
12:55
@RоryMcCune try simplified!
@silverpenguin starred.
@Xander pls help these UKers are insane.

« first day (1923 days earlier)      last day (3255 days later) »