« first day (330 days earlier)      last day (4848 days later) » 

00:34
@thisjosh migration. I'm pretty certain we have something similar here already though, on second thoughts.
 
6 hours later…
 
9 hours later…
15:19
afternoon all - anyone fancy reviewing this wee QOTW post I rattled off during a conference call?
15:45
somone here told me to publish my lab notes.
was it you, @thisjosh?
16:14
Posted by David Fullerton on November 11th, 2011

As you may have noticed, we’re throwing a party over on the Gaming site.

If you’re not a gamer, you may not know that two huge games came out this week: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3.  Game launches are always big for gaming.stackexchange.com because they’re a unique opportunity to get Google search result share before it vanishes into the void of vBulletin and phpBB.  We wanted to throw a big launch party for this year’s game release season, but we couldn’t agree on which game to pick. …

@StefanoPalazzo Hi Stefano - your new avatar threw me.
:-) It's one day only
@StefanoPalazzo for a special reason?
today is Oli appreciation day
Checking our blog stats for today - top referrer: Bruce Schneier's blog. Amazing what a little comment over there can do :-)
@StefanoPalazzo oh - that is brilliant
@RoryAlsop Looks good to me.
@ThomasPornin Cheers - just thought I'd write up a quickie as there has been a bit of a gap
hmm - decision time - post it now, or wait until Monday....
ahh - now will do just fine :-)
16:50
@StefanoPalazzo It's a bit fun doing stuff like that. See the fervor around our August event.
22
Q: Paddington Bear Choppertar

Kyle BrandtMany of our top users seem to have avatars with a picture of themselves in a car with what appears to me to be Paddington Bear: So what is the story behind this?

Yeah I remember being confused by that :)
Looks like nobody got a picture of the chatroom side bar. Too bad.
posted on November 11, 2011 by roryalsop

The Question of the week this week was asked by nealmcb in response to the ever wider list of standards which apply in different industries. The Financial Services industry has a well defined set of standards including the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS) which focuses specifically on credit card data and primary account numbers, but [...]

so, we've written down all the things we learned when implementing RSA. It'd be fantastic if you guys could take a quick look at it, and maybe give me some notes. There must be a few mistakes
mh, the formatting is slightly messed up there.
@StefanoPalazzo One note for you... φ(pq) = φ(p)φ(q) = (p−1)(q−1) is only true when p,q are prime. That is, φ(p) = p-1 for p prime, but not for say 10, where it is in fact equal to 4 (co-prime numbers being 1, 3, 7, 9 < 10)
It doesn't really cause any problems not having that in though, since p,q must be prime.
17:08
still, that wasn't obvious. I'll put it in, thanks :)
I basically skipped over that bit in my post on crypto linking RSA to fermat's last theorem - crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/388/…
(blatant self promotion... no wait, it's site promotion!)
oh, I should really put this answer into the references section.
17:24
@StefanoPalazzo You might want to add a note somewhere stating that even though the exponentiation is at the core of RSA, you also need an appropriate padding scheme if you want to achieve decent security (and the padding will be distinct, depending on whether you want signatures or asymmetric encryption)
that's a good idea, I'll add it as a footnote to "we can only encrypt numbers"
and mention that the recommended padding scheme is / has to be really complicated
@StefanoPalazzo what it has to be... well, that's complex to define. The recommended padding schemes (OAEP and PSS) are complicated, but they can be "proven" (in the random oracle model, which is not the best, but better than nothing).
just to make sure. When I started this project, I thought you could just treat your bytes as a base256 number. Took me a while to figure out that that's a bad idea :)
I can't really explain semantic security and chosen-plaintext attacks in the margin, but that'll do.
 
1 hour later…
18:35
@ThomasPornin Out of interest is there a paper I can read on that?
Or explanation somewhere on the internet?
Perfect!
Rumour has it that Paul Kocher did not actually invent it; he received a tip from the NSA
That's an absolutely unconfirmed rumour which is not even totally plausible, but it involves the NSA so it must be true.
@ThomasPornin of course.

« first day (330 days earlier)      last day (4848 days later) »