« first day (1511 days earlier)      last day (3667 days later) » 

16:00
@kalina who doesn't love Tenacious D!
I think I'm just going to stop saying "who" or "what" and just be silent whenever you bring something up like that
@RоryMcCune I thought that was tennille
@kalina seriously ... you don't know who tenacious D are?
writers of the greatest song of all time?
I don't have a link to the song itself
I feel like you're expecting me to know this person
but here's the tribute
16:02
@RоryMcCune which ones that then?
I can't believe how mean you guys are to me when you clearly know that I'm dying of this cold.
@AviD they tell you about it in the tribute
stars Dave Grohl as the devil
@kalina "person"
@RоryMcCune ahhh
@Simon also that's a YT link with decent quality
I'm glad that my taste of music has involved with time, unlike grandparents here.
@RоryMcCune 480p is decent quality for you? I dunno how I managed to not burst in laughter.
16:05
@Simon oh yeah
I assumed with it being VEVO
that they would've uploaded better quality
huh
heh. I got a coldcall marketer email today, wanting to sell some fraud detection to Stack Exchange.
Had trouble reading my linkedin profile, apparently - looks like he mixed up the titles and the companies.
Should have told him that you were very interested in his product.
hey guys, let's listen to music off youtube, recorded at 128kbps using a microphone capturing a source from across the street
PROPER CD QUALITY
not everyone can hear the difference
not everyone wasnt in artillery
not everybody can hear the difference
unfortunately
those people still want their opinion to be heard
if you can't hear the difference then surely you're ill fitted for commenting on the subject
EVER
16:17
@kalina not about sound clarity, no
no, I went off into a rant for no reason a tall
ignore me
@AviD You can easily hear the difference when you're listening to bad quality.
of course, that has little if anything to do with quality of content.
@Simon no, YOU can.
sure it does
high quality content recorded bad is bad quality content
it has to be very bad for me.
16:18
Properly done 192 kbps vs 320, now not everyone can hear the difference.
@kalina that makes no sense.
you can't show me a video of "the best thing ever", recorded at 32x32, and expect me to appreciate it
according to this, as long as he uses proper equipment, Justine Bieber is a superb artist.
@kalina "at all" BOOM :op
@RоryMcCune a spelling mistake is not the same as misuse of you're/your/you are
16:19
@kalina you are unable to ignore the trivial, and focus solely on the content?
@AviD It does make sense. I can convert a 128 kbps to 320 file, it won't make it sound better.
@AviD sometimes, if the quality is 90% and not lower
@kalina actually in that case it did, I was just about to edit the typo :op
thats like saying "This steak is disgusting because its on an ugly plate."
@AviD are you able to watch a rip of a blockbuster movie recorded with a camera phone?
could be the best movie ever
the recording you're showing me is terribad to the point where the movie isn't what I'm seeing
16:20
that would not be enjoyable, no.
if somebody says to me
"check this track out, it has an awesome bassline"
but if it was short enough, I would be able to stand it long enough to have an opinion on "is it the best movie ever"
and then links me to a youtube video with everything below 200hz missing
I wouldn't even listen to it, because it's a waste of my time
@kalina but noone here said that
@AviD the overall principle is the same, though
16:21
tenacious D is not about the clarity of sound, or the quality of bassline.
no, because youre missing the point.
oh noes, kalina in missing the point shocker
hehe
#careface
@AviD Oh yeah? It's not about the quality of the production? What is it about then?
I don't make any sense now that I'm dying of this cold /cc: @Iszi
@Simon that implies that you usually make sense....
16:27
I knew someone would say that, damn it.
@Simon it was the obvious shot
I guess the only thing I can reply to this is:
pls
you're an obvious shot.
10/10
@Simon you're not dying but the cold has allowed you a new perspective on how the rest of us see you it seems
must be a Point of View cold
16:32
I love it when clients have issues with my software that I can't reproduce
You can't reproduce
@kalina are you channelling simon today?
10/10
I've just tried to google whether it's s/can\'t/shouldn\'t/ or s/can't/shouldn't/
and then I realized: I don't care
It also doesn't help that they speak dutch and I don't
16:34
@DavidFreitag just "mijn nederlands is niet goed" and then "engels?"
@kalina Nope, just very broken google translated english
I hope I don't need to call these dudes.
@DavidFreitag well then follow up with ENGLISH mellow lover. DO YOU SPEAK IT?
followed by "say what again..."
@kalina Alas I am not a large angry black man. That won't really work out for me.
10/10
that's racist
16:36
@DavidFreitag "I am not a large angry black man, but I have one in my pants"
and my name isn't Alas
@DavidFreitag that is unacceptably crude
@AviD ?
@AviD I would say it's a bit early to be hammered, but it's probably like 8pm there right now.
McDonalds new advertising campaign: THE D: I'M LOVIN' IT
16:38
starbait
shameless
There is a very angry person posting in the Arduino developers mailing list asking about things he could get the answers to in minutes of googling.
@DavidFreitag Or ask on Arduino and have it googled by others
@TildalWave These are questions I (mostly) readily know the answer to.
Most are also readily googleable before they existed on SE
16:47
Also, he is asking about very specific implementation details. I doubt the people on Arduino.se would be able to answer just as the Arduino forum goers had no idea
I want to do <this extremely complex project> but I don't want to work out how this platform works - make it for me!
lol, nice @Rory
@kalina - fixed that for you :-)
@DavidFreitag thank you. I'm here all week.
wat
@DavidFreitag huh, what did @RoryAlsop do
16:49
@RoryAlsop psh
There's no edit history! Blasphemy!
@kalina No more like "How is USBCore implemented" or "Is there some doc available for this or that"
@AviD he successfully evaluated that calculating the mass of your mother is a futile task
ahh spotted it. how did @DavidFreitag?
16:50
@AviD Eagle eye. Also, editing it pinged me.
@AviD it would have pinged him
@AviD it was a reply to him?
@kalina hehe
what kind of moderator doesn't know how the system he's moderating works
16:50
OKAAAY I GOT IT
oh right, literally EVERY SINGLE SE MOD
4
@kalina LOL
jeez louise, you dont all need to jump on me
@AviD so we should jump one at a time?
Dibs!
16:51
@AviD I couldn't jump on you, you're so fat that I just can't jump that high
maybe I didnt actually BOTHER LOOKING WHO IT WAS A RESPONSE TO
@Simon lol
@Simon youre a dibs
0/10
@kalina thats not fat, babaay
what is a dibs?
@TildalWave calling shotgun for children
16:52
@TildalWave It's an imaginary candy. Kinda like unicorns.
Calling "dibs" is the American English term, also known as "Bags" in the Australia and New Zealand, and as "Bagsies" in UK and Ireland, for an informal convention where one declares a first claim to something to which no one else has a clearly recognized right. Calling "dibs" or "Bagsies" is only possible when the caller wants the responsibility of the object. It is important to note that it is not possible to "undibs", if the caller wants to. Such a declaration is often recognized in certain cultures, or sub-cultures, as a means to avoid arguments over relatively trivial issues although can be...
I prefer to call chewey.
@DavidFreitag I prefer to call ghostbusters.
If a donut's acting strange, who do you call?
16:53
@AviD poor scientists, and that's confirmed
Because apparently Chewbacca will tear your arms off and beat you to death with them before you get a chance to use your shotgun.
I am immune to all imaginary creatures, whether that's Chewbacca, the tooth fairy, or Jesus.
Or your mom.
@AviD syntax error: illegal call at line 1
my mom is not imaginary, I only wish she was
16:54
o
@Simon Or your face.
@kalina how about @Lighty's gf?
@AviD His hand is imaginary?
@AviD 10/10
@AviD that depends on whether @Lighty is @Simon or not
16:55
wat no
I'm almost convinced that @Simon might actually have a girlfriend
in which case, so would @Lighty
@kalina noice
wot
Pics or it never happened.
@AviD she imagined @Lighty just so someone would claim to date her?
16:55
I suspect that posting a picture of her in here would be a bad idea.
@TildalWave oo that would be a shyamalan twist
@Simon No, it would be a terrible idea.
@AviD wot?
pls
16:56
not nsfw, despite the pic
Some people are working here.
@Simon er
@AviD Yeah but the thumb makes it look suspicious, and that's all someone needs.
basically fatal violation of privacy tbh
@kalina wat
16:57
@kalina not if it was a picture that was already in the public domain
she should totally break up with you just for the fact you admitted there are pictures of her in existence and because you considered uploading them to the internet
^ (referring to unpingable)
you're clearly a weak link
@DavidFreitag hey I dont know what the thumbnail pic will be before I paste it
hows that?
If I didn't refuse to use facebook I might try to stalk you and her.
@AviD You didn't have to change it, but now I don't have to keep changing tabs
16:59
@RоryMcCune well, if the picture was already "out there", he'd still be guilty of adopting the position of PR without approval
@AviD when that dude said "look, your movies are based on twists..." I really thought he's gonna say "twitter"
@kalina I'm not you, people who love me aren't ashamed of it.
@kalina s'that a serious crime then?
@RоryMcCune sure is
@Simon OH SNAP
17:00
even the most innocent of person will make mistakes when confronted by the press
@kalina riight what if your proud of something your better half has done and then post it?
the press don't care about your rights, they care about pressuring you into making a mistake and then make a living off it
and it includes their image
@RоryMcCune still no
@kalina well just as well my missus doesn't see things that way, fairly sure I've posted videos of her on here
17:03
@RоryMcCune thast different. She is a public figure.
"public figure" == shes not embarrassed to go out in public.
^lol
@RоryMcCune But does she even lift?
@AviD heh but if someone posts a picture on a public site, then you could equally argue they're not worried about it being public.....
@RоryMcCune I wouldnt assume cognizance
That's a word? Cute.
@kalina Oh come on, it's not like we're a bunch of creepy internet people whom @Simon has never met.
17:08
@Simon @RоryMcCune see ^ ?
@AviD There are a lot of words that are missing to my vocabulary due to my Frenchness.
@AviD obviously it's context dependent, lack of knowledge of privacy features on facebook leading to a picture being publicly available is obv. different to posting your picture on your own blog.
@RоryMcCune no no, I didnt mean of context, or of how facebook works. I meant that for most people, I do not assume they are even aware of what they are doing.
@AviD pretty difficult to act based on an assumption that everyone posting info. on the 'net didn't really mean to do it...
user image
2
raz
raz
What's a fox say?
17:43
Ah, yes. Love me 'dat full belly.
@DavidFreitag That is indeed what a fox would say
@Kisunminttu With a british accent an a monacle.
@Kisunminttu nice
17:45
... am I the only one who can't see the picture?
@Kisunminttu I can see it
@Kisunminttu Yep.
Interesting...
@Kisunminttu the shark one, I can definitely see that.
@RоryMcCune the problem is, I would be more "open" and "myself" around people I know weren't just going to blurt out whatever it is they know about me at the first opportunity
there are many things that others just don't need to know
words escape me
I wouldn't have an issue with somebody taking a picture of me rolling a j but I would have a rather large issue with most people seeing that picture
so it's easier for it to not exist in the first place, preferably
17:55
Sometimes it's nice living such a mundane life. There isn't really anything about me that I really feel the need to keep secret
@kalina indeed I was talking about images that you yourself had already made a conscious decision to make public. To me if it's unambiguously public (e.g. a security conference vid on youtube with your name against it) then reposting is just fine
@RоryMcCune that's a decent way to look at it. private is private, public is public
And c is for cookie.
@DavidFreitag When there was a big concern about certain plastics leaking hormones into food, my wife and I decided to try to challenge ourselves for a month to only eat food that had never touched plastic (simply as an experiment to try to find alternatives) - it proved impossible. We found that we couldn't go a week without being forced to obtain food that at one point had touched plastic
@Simon and we all know D is for ... Doughnut
18:01
@RоryMcCune Donut*
that revelation was shocking to know how much we didn't have a choice - the same is true, I find, for personal privacy
@Simon is the star there to indicate that that's the wrong spelling and you know it?
it's not that I have a life I want to hide, it's that I can't have the choice
@RоryMcCune pls
@schroeder I think I subconsciously came to the same conclusion so now I live life as an open book
18:02
@schroeder You're a choice.
@schroeder I don't know, I think I've done a good job of separating private from public
aka: I don't put things on the internet I am ashamed of
@Ohnana but it's not about "shame" - it's about having the choice
@Ohnana What do you put on the Internet other than Rihanna lyrics anyway?
Oh snap.
@schroeder but I do have a choice. if I don't want someone do not know something, I make the choice to not tell them. If I REALLY don't want someone to know, I choose to keep it to myself
then again it also helps that I couldn't give less of a fuck about what people know about me. hmm.
18:05
@Ohnana but you don't always have the choice to make that distinction - some things are public regardless
@schroeder can you provide an example?
Sure - this very chat. There is already the understanding that anything done on the "Internet" is public, but that understanding is very, very new. I cannot use the Internet for anything private, as you yourself assume. But every word I type I must consider to be broadcast to the world and I have no choice but to talk to you (someone I do not know personally) using a megaphone
You're very new.
@schroeder what about services like tor? or encrypted communication?
Tor is fractionally public, and all encrypted communication is public, too, just in cypher text
18:12
i wouldn't say crypto is public. You can see its representation, but typically the meaning is hidden
@Ohnana yes, but the fact I did communicate, and who I communicated with, along with a potentially reversible representation of the content is all public
meta-data can be just as intrusive as specific content
I'm not donning a tin foil hat here, I'm just highlighting how much actually is public and this level of "publicity" is new in society
we can choose not to care, and that's ok, but we also need to recognize what we are choosing not to care about
@schroeder no, I understand your point. I've heard the "it's just metadata" too many times
> However, the requested information from the tables is not shown. Why, and how make it return results?
not an infosec problem
I guess I just don't want people to forget that there are other things in the world besides the internet, like paper diaries and talking to yourself
18:20
@Ohnana Which can also be read and overheard.
@DavidFreitag very true. but it's not indexable by a search engine
diaries and talking to yourself are all self-focussed - the thought that speaking to 1 other person is now "public" is a new idea
"back when I was a kid ..."
@schroeder depends on how big "public" is
for public =1, it is. for public > 1, that's new
DMZ in "actually talking about security" shocker
like I said, crypto is a good way to whittle down your potential audience
18:23
@Ohnana Yep, and so is @Simon's mom
@DavidFreitag hey, i'm still waiting for his mum to be read into buffer so i can hash her
oh burn
@Ohnana Giggity.
he's not even here to see it
but if he was, he'd be burnt
@simon hey, i'm still waiting for your mum to be read into buffer so i can hash her
delayed burn
18:26
@TildalWave I agree.
@Ohnana nurd
@Simon you're not denying it
Denying what?
I've been saying since the beginning of the day that I'm dying of this cold, I'm not denying it.
also is the statement " we cannot predict an output for all inputs to a program" related to the halting problem, or is that another axiom? I think my brain wires are crossing
cc: ex-dad
18:36
Sigh.
raz
raz
2
Q: How to encrypt in PHP, properly?

D.W.How do I encrypt data in PHP, properly, using symmetric-key encryption? I'm looking for a solution that uses cryptography properly without making of the usual mistake. I have a message M and a secret S. In particular, it should use authenticated encryption, choose IVs properly, and generate th...

I think the real solution here is to not use PHP to begin with.
@raz Unfortunately, for many applications, it is far too late for that.
@raz /cough Drupal
18:53
You weren't pleased with the base64 suggestion from SO? What a shame. — Simon 18 mins ago
@TildalWave base64? seriously?
@TildalWave I was amused by the weird use of "salt" in that example.
-9
A: How do you Encrypt and Decrypt a PHP String?

Manish JangirTake two strings. One your appropriate salt value and second is your original string which has to be encrypted. Now explode your salt value in two parts and concate both parts to both ends of your original string and encode it with base64_encode. In the decryption function first decode it with ...

@Xander translation: If it's a sufficiently complex process, it must be encrypted
@schroeder And the only time I've seen Base64 "encryption" recommended. cryptofails.com/post/87697461507/…
At first, I wanted to post something like "I'm surprised no one at SO suggested ROT13" but then I scrolled down and saw the base64 gem.
18:59
heh another successful push into self-deletion :)
"it's not fun and games until someone takes their ball and goes home"
19:14
You're not fun.
no, no I'm not :(
FYI, we engaged Rapid7 to perform web application testing and the consultant we got was very, very good
I'd recommend
@schroeder they definitely have some cool people, didn't know they did much on the consultancy side (I know them more from tools side)
@schroeder My impression last time I checked was that Rapid7 was also quite expensive. Did you find that to be true, or not particularly?
@schroeder <spam>!!
:)
@Xander Oh, very expensive - but frankly, worth it
19:20
more spam!!
cue Monty Python
easy to work with, professional, the report was very clear - exactly what we needed the engagement to be
@schroeder Ok, good to know. Sounds like it hasn't changed much, but also good to know they provide value for it.
@TildalWave yeah I'd pimp xXxx and Xxxxxxx in the US but they're part of the same group I work for so that would be even more spam
but I do genuinely think they have some cool people
@RоryMcCune Matasano?
@RоryMcCune It's OK I'm not complaining, I love me some good ol' spam with spam spam spam and spam
if you don't like spam, s/spam/bacon :P
19:23
@Xander well Matasano are part of NCC Group :) They have some really good ruby people
and of course they do the crypto challenges
which are on my long list of "rainy day" projects to start
lord save us!
@TildalWave hey I didn't say it
till asked
@RоryMcCune I've done a bunch of them. They're good fun. They were the motivation I needed to start writing the cryptanalysis toolkit I'd been meaning to write forever.
@Xander yeah they look like what I need to solidify some of my fairly shaky understanding of crypto fundamentals. times like this lack of a CS/math degree trip you up a bit
@RоryMcCune Yes, I know exactly.
19:26
@Xander Did you really just do a contraction of "I had"?
SORCERY!
@Simon I am nothing if not an artist with this language o' mine.
@RоryMcCune Do tell when you do start that "rainy day" project tho
some of us might wanna build an arc :)
@TildalWave heh
heh
Look, I spelled "heh" backwards!
@RoryAlsop and potentially others. humblebundle.com/books <-- Humble bundle of eBooks includes some interesting ones
although I'd obv. recommend not paying too much to avoid JavaScript and Python stuff!
19:31
@Simon now type 434 in your pocket calculator and turn it upside down
or 707
@TildalWave OMG! IT SAYS "TERRORIST"!
EVERYONE, @TildalWave IS A donut!
I edited that in case someone thinks it's true.
ah thanks, yes I'd much rather be eaten than waterboarded by morons
1
Q: 3G modem security/vulnerability?

DonovanMany people use this kind of internet and not much is known about its security. I would like to know more about current(2015) security vulnerabilities of usb dongles for 3G mobile internet. First question is about locating. Presume that modem, prepaid card and credit are obtained anonymously. If...

> Our system has identified this post as possible spam; please review carefully
OK it's a crap question, but what about it triggered the spam alarm while many others that actually included shortened URLs over product names in a single paragraph answers didn't?
@LucasKauffman completely SFW I presume?
@TildalWave 75%
19:42
You know what else is 75% SFW?
@Simon 25% pure cocaine?
No, my D you donut.
@LucasKauffman I linked that a while back... some people complained
personally I think his stuff is v.funny
and the vid is actually more SFW than the original

« first day (1511 days earlier)      last day (3667 days later) »