« first day (249 days earlier)      last day (4929 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

20:00
mine are much more impressive, obviously
badum-tish
You know, @RoryAlsop, I always pegged you for a Centauri.
Cthulhu Fhtagn!
Ïa! Ïa!
@RoryAlsop that was with an N, right....?
@GrahamLee ahh - feeling the love...or is that horror. I can't tell any more, this creeping fear blinds me ...
20:04
@RoryAlsop roll for SAN
Argh! I can feel my storage area network escaping!</reallybadRPGs>
/me really wants to play in a good Cthulu game sometime
I used to love that game
it's been a long time
maybe my kids will get into it soon
They should all be old enough soon.
I'm curious if I should CW a question.
well, better pop out, before the level here really deteriorates.
besides, I have a long day at the beach tomorrow.... :)
20:06
Well, I can't CW, but it looks like a candidate for one.
@Incognito you're welcome to try...
@Incognito CW are currently persona non grata.
@Incognito what's the Q?
@AviD Questiona non grata?
that is, the current guidance from SEI is that they are to be used extremely sparingly.
The answers to the question are more of a CW response than anything: security.stackexchange.com/questions/6424/…
20:07
@ScottPack yeah, I guess thats better
Lots of answers are like "Oh I saw this," which is good CW, but not really an answer to the Q.
@AviD seeya later then
Posted by Grace Note on August 19th, 2011

When you mark a post community wiki on a Stack Exchange site, that means …

this post can be edited by anyone with 100 reputation

this post does not generate any reputation for anyone when upvoted or downvoted

The main advantage of community wiki — more editing — was nerfed when we introduced suggested edits. With suggested edits, anyone, even an anonymous user, can edit anything — so long as another experienced user reviews and approves their edit.

This leaves many wondering — what’s the point of Community Wiki? …

(trying to find my favourity jQuery zalgo meme from SO
@RoryAlsop gnite
20:08
oh - feel free to review my draft QOTW post anyone: security.blogoverflow.com/wp-admin/…
well, anyone with reviewer status
@RoryAlsop I have a blogoverflow account, but am not allowed to edit the item :(
hang on - one moment to change its staus
@AviD Hrmm. Maybe I should put a bounty out there for higher quality answers?
@GrahamLee - changed it to review. I had it in draft still:-)
@incognito A bounty is often a good idea. We haven't used it over much here, and as we are new, a bounty can help someone's rep significantly
worth a try
yup, not allowed to review drafts :(
I say it looks great, post as-is!
20:12
@RoryAlsop Sure, I'll toss out a bounty.
Cool - will schedule it for Firday. I have reviewed @JeffFerland's post as well and think it could publish today/tomorrow while BSides still current news
@RoryAlsop you know not to trust my opinion that it's postworthy, right? I can't read it
ahh - sorry, thought you meant you had read it when I changed it to pending review
one quick revert coming up
ok it's in pending review @GrahamLee
Hey @JeffFerland
I need help. I'm checking the site while I wait for the eye doc
Heh - I do it while commuting, waiting for the kettle to boil...etc
20:17
@RoryAlsop Y U NO LET ME READ
@GrahamLee - should be readable, no? It's in Pending so that should be visible to all reviewers
obviously I don't have reviewer rights
ahhhh - no, you are a contributor....gimme amo
hah, that's a joke
and kapowieeeee - job done
now you be editor
@Incognito - wow ... a 500 rep bounty should gain interest. Will tweet this one as well.
20:21
OK, now I've read it, I still think it's worth publishing
I did remove the tag, though, as that usually applies to the laws and regulations side of things
@GrahamLee haha - thanks
@RoryAlsop Awesome. I hope it's a question that drags more talent into the community, it's part of what I was going for.
I am really interested, sadly I just don't know enough about that side of things
@GrahamLee - on the overly general questions getting wiki-ed - i had already talked to ChrisF about that once on one of the other meta sites.
I definitely think "don't get into a position where you need to send an email" is Rule 0
20:22
I did like @Graham's rocket science comment though
@GrahamLee absolutely - I can add that in now
I'm here all week, try the veal
ahh - I see you are still in editing - will leave you to it:-)
@GrahamLee I've been chortling all day
@RoryAlsop I'm not - must be some remnant state
I've closed the tab
20:24
ok
Heh - was looking at the blog stats. What do you think the 3 search terms used most today are?
I had a friend shout at me (metaphorically) the other day for leaving chat in the "Graham is typing…" state, when indeed no such thing had occurred
security log should be 90 days
jeff ferland
are there still wolves among us?
that first one I understand, even the second one
but the wolves question?
okaaaayy
@GrahamLee I have a T-Shirt like that from IBM, only it's 3 Z/os mainframes howling at the moon.
20:27
@RoryAlsop You want me to start generating some vaguely NSFW search referrers to fill up the logs?
@ScottPack hahahaha - whatever is trending on twitter:-)
@Scott - did you see romanticallyapocalyptic.com when we were discussing comics? Or was it one of your ones originally
I remember back in the early days of this millennium, discovering referral logs from Lycos with the query "UKUUG+porn" at ukuug.org
That's not nearly as much a thing of beauty as I was hoping
re-uploaded because it was bmp =/
Very nice
20:29
@RoryAlsop That is not one of mine
Note NSFW
I like to rock it out at the clubs. Chicks dig the z/os.
The Internet is for....
@Incognito I likes it
@ScottPack It's very good
@RoryAlsop I had a friend talking about some weird search hits on his blog. So I made up a really disturbing sexual search term and forged a bunch of GETs. The conversation later that night was much more amusing :)
@ScottPack excellent work
20:31
@Incognito I would pay a small amount to own such a t-shirt.
@GrahamLee The also sent me one that says "Mainframes do IT 24/7."
You just can't beat geek chat up lines:-)
@Incognito From whence did these shirts come?
I get people asking me what my black wristband signifies - I let them read it. Geeks get it, others just look blankly
(it does say Cthulhu Fhtagn on it:-)
That reminds me actually - I have a cool geeky toy I should proffer as a prize for something here...hmm, will have a think
20:34
@RoryAlsop the Lowest-Rep Mod award?
this toy is too cool for that
I think that goes to shog9
@RoryAlsop I have an unopened "geek man" that's worthless to me. happyworker.com/geekman
@aking1012 I'm fair positive he's an SEI employee, which makes him a site-wide mod by default.
It would appear so
20:40
@Incognito that's pretty cool. I'm trying to find photos already online of this wee toy, so I don't need to unbox it and take pics
it is an essential tool for anyone who has any sort of telephone support role
@Incognito - tweeted your q
@RoryAlsop I'm debating answering my own Q to set a higher water mark.
@JeffFerland - your follow up BSides post is scheduled now for tomorrow. @Scott - I bumped yours back a week as yours will be relevant all the time, whereas @Jeff's is quite time dependent
@RoryAlsop No worries
@Incognito worth doing if you already have a good answer. People will want to then beat yours to win the bounty
@Incognito - you're referring to your satellite hacking bounty question? Just a note: You can get most of the hardware you need for free. Drive around rural areas and get the old stuff just for "removing it for free". That gets you a good amount of the gear. There's only a couple of pieces of hardware you need after that. Unfortunately, testing is a bit tough and I wouldn't want to be fuzzing satellites, specifically without knowing the owners...
20:46
@RoryAlsop I actually asked it because, a long time ago on a site called HackThisSite there was a question a newb asked about such things, the more senior members trolled the guy. I posted a quality answer, but deleted it after I decided the staff were too busy bickering about what software to run the boards on, not the community. I decided they didn't deserve it.
It was neat, I took someone step-by-step how to look at different hardware, what's generally required, but I did have a lot of missing information. But I know a decent bit about it.
@aking1012 I'm in no way trying to actually do it :P. However, I feel it's a fun question and one that has a lot of room for growth.
And could become very important over the next decade or so as people find out what we all know: we can do it for cheap, and easy.
I'd rather have future comsat designers be able to google this, so some Iranian renegade doesn't start crashing things into cities thanks to the equivalent of mysql injections.
Rather than keep thinking it's safe because it's way up in the sky somewhere.
@Incognito I think the solution there is to stop farming out your satellites to the lowest bidder.
@Incognito I think it has value here, as then people will be likely to look at the countermeasures required.
@incognito - yeah. probably shouldn't be using securid for it either lolz - without reseeding anyway. Did you figure that the RSA hack that got all/most of the seeds was stage 1 of the Lockheed(or whatever aero company it was). Definitely. It was the same way with RFID for a while. If you programmed your own chip most of the reader applications were vuln to sql-inject like stuff
And as @GrahamLee says, to up the baseline security level
Also, I hope it draws attention from other parts of the internet as a fun question that will bring more blood into the site.
20:56
Wish we could show the mod stats - you can spot what each popular question does to member numbers etc., and just how big a difference the xkcd question made:-)
On Iranian renegade...it could just be a "mistake" when they try to admin their own network...like that BGP black-hole that DoS-ed a lot of big-name sites for a while...
@RoryAlsop Has that looked like a sustained presence?
I lurk here quite a bit, I just don't have many questions to promote activity.
@ScottPack yep. The peak was immense, but the level it has dropped back down to is still well up on even the highest previous peaks
@RoryAlsop Excellent!
20:59
Alright everyone, I'm headed out. Take care.
well, there was a spike early July, but it was short
@Incognito seeya later
Ta
Probably time for me as well. It is, after all, quitting time in the canonical time zone.
what the stats do show is continual increase, and then every time there is a spike, the rate of increase increases
@ScottPack and I do have a glass of wine now, and wife is back from the gym, so I may also leave and be social IRL
ttfn all
have a pleasant evening
@RoryAlsop That will be me in about 3 hours.
g'night
@ScottPack drinking wine with my wife?
dash it all, man
:-)
21:01
Shit! Was that out loud?
LOL
later
 
3 hours later…
23:55
@ScottPack Err, thats not what I meant. Sorry, my nerual stackpointer most not be triggering for change in context.
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (249 days earlier)      last day (4929 days later) »