« first day (1309 days earlier)      last day (3869 days later) » 

15:00
@AviD ping
dammit, saw that coming.
@AviD Hey, Avi.. hey hey.. AVI!!!
@Adnan yeah, that too.
@FEichinger Yes, there was that whole "Imperialism" thing. That was a bit racist.
Hey @Avid, you off the phone yet?
15:05
actually yes.
@AviD Boo.
Why didn't I yolo when he was on the phone?
@Xander heh. Ping away.
@Simon I don't know
He would have been like "Sir, please hang on, I must do something important".
15:05
@Simon I reckon he can do it with one hand
6
@RoryAlsop Oh lawd.
He'd probably tell the client, "Need to kick Simon - you understand"
5
@AviD That was a short call. They must not like you very much.
@RoryAlsop I'm sure his client knows who I am by now.
@RoryAlsop yeah, I dont use "sir". Unless I'm being ironic.
15:06
@AviD no
@Xander true. postponed till later.
this time I wont tell you.
@Xander Hey, now, we helped a lot of countries develop infrastructure and shit!
And we mostly left peacefully when they no longer liked us.
@FEichinger Oh didja now? Tell us all about it.
@FEichinger Please. Us, Americans, destroy infrastructure and shit. That's way more badass.
@AviD I did say mostly.
15:08
@FEichinger yeah, tell me about it.
Did I ever tell you guys that my last name means "From Scotland"? I must have some French Scottish blood.
Also, I'm home.
@Simon you must be really attractive and reliable.
@FEichinger how'd your exam go
@AviD You just described some of my virtues.
15:10
@kalina I'm ... uhh ... sorry for what they do to you?
@kalina Meh. Should be enough to pass.
@Simon what is it?
@FEichinger Sociology exam? You're not gonna pass.
@RoryAlsop Hey, I'm following you on Twitter, go find it out!
@Simon Could you talk less out of your ass, please. It's starting to smell around here.
@FEichinger Rejected. Come back with an Ace Ventura reference.
15:11
@AviD lulz
@Simon that means opening twitter...
back shortly
lawl
@AviD ...
@Simon That's for you
Or, actually, even @killana
@Adnan Aaaww, thanks <3
15:16
@Simon wait, you're in french canada?
@Simon totally failed to find you. Why doen't twitter let you scroll through followers alphabetically?
@RoryAlsop Because you're not supposed to know your followers, just the amount of them.
Ahhhh - now I have found you
@AJHenderson Ya, I'm in Montreal.
@RoryAlsop Because Twitter was written by morons.
15:18
yup
@Simon it makes so much more sense now
@Xander and I haven't learned how to use it properly
@AJHenderson Does it?
Twitter is not intended to be a social network, but a microblogging/broadcasting system. As such, people relations are irrelevant to twitter.
There's a reason why DMs and @-replies took a while to get properly supported.
and even more terrifying, Simon is only a little over 3 hours away from me
15:20
@ton.yeung That's how you pronounce it, yes.
@RoryAlsop I usually go to followers scroll to get them to fill in then CTRL-F after that found Simon...
@Xander what do you expect, they couldn't even figure out how to send a message longer than 140 characters
@ton.yeung I played the first 3 I think.
@RоryMcCune even on a mobile?
I have never even played an assassin's creed game before
15:21
@FEichinger "Twitter is not intended to be a social network, but a microblogging/broadcasting system, and was written by morons." // Fixed it for you.
I don't have twitter on desktop. I might have tweetdeck on one, somewhere, maybe
@ton.yeung I don't even remember that, did he really say that?
@kalina All I know is there's a hoodie abusing his ASBO
@RoryAlsop Chances are, that version of tweetdeck no longer has API access.
Of course it would make sense because Ubisoft Montreal made the game but still, that's the lulz.
15:21
@RoryAlsop ahh mobile <barf>
@Xander Twitter is actually pretty well-written for its original purpose. The years of "extending" it have taken their toll in almost every direction.
@ton.yeung Ahh, nice.
but yeah, simon is like directly on top of me
3
errr... that came out wrong
@AJHenderson You knew exactly what you were doing.
@ton.yeung Yes of course.
15:24
@FEichinger the beer clouded my judgement
AJ, don't say more stuff like that please.
@RoryAlsop asbos are bullshit anyway
@ton.yeung Amazing scene.
Haha.
seriously though, Simon is due north of me. He practically lives down the street...
thankfully a very, VERY long way down the street
Is there a specific time I should go to? 12 mins implies a lot of yoloing.
@ton.yeung Nein. Ok I'll go there.
15:26
@ton.yeung ?t=2m39s
@FEichinger That may well be true, but it's more fun to abuse them for anything I don't like instead.
His accent is awful, actually.
@Simon of course it's awful, it's a French accent.
You donuts.
oo donuts.
15:27
@Simon It's an American pretending to be an Italian pretending to be French.
@FEichinger Oh boy.
it was probably secretly outsourced to the Indians.
@kalina you say that like someone who has had one?
@Adnan I hope they are helping... If not, you should try Mobilat ;D
15:43
"x is a genderqueer gray-asexual panromantic polyamorous person" that's not one I've seen before
@RоryMcCune I think I know her/him/it!
@RоryMcCune I dont know what is more notable about that blogger, that she/he/it is Israeli, or that the blog is on LiveJournal.
@AviD who knew livejournal was still a thing!
@RоryMcCune inorite?
15:49
Hey gang!
You're still at it!
Whoa.
@nealmcb welcome back!!
My latest discovery prompted a question:
how was your sabbatical?
0
Q: How to help users manage password portfolios based on risks of compromise?

nealmcbA framework for modeling password management risks and costs, and the beginnings of a good strategy for users to help them manage passwords for their often large portfolios of accounts is outlined in the paper Password Portfolios and the Finite-Effort User: Sustainably Managing Large Numbers of A...

@AviD It continues.... But when I find a fun topic for this place, I love to dig back in....
:-)
15:52
@RoryAlsop no but I have had a section 59
wheelspinning in the rain
@nealmcb very interesting. It seems intuitively correct, but nice to see some research on that - will be digging in to it later.
not sure how easy it is to explain though, as we all know "users" are horrible at making good risk decisions.
@AviD I do it well.
doesnt seem so.
hehe, how many mods kicked you all at once??
Am I supposed to know the answer?
We should get SE to publish statistics on "most kicked from a chatroom".
15:57
> “There is an anomaly in my pants”
LOL
@AviD indeed
Ya know IT development has to be the only place you can google "vagrant sprinkle" and have it be entirely non-dodgy
"They were totally respectful and non-creepy" thats a first for the TSA
@kalina that's not like a rule 34 is it :-)
@nealmcb hello stranger. I keep seeing your name elsewhere, but not here :-)
@AviD Yeah - I don't claim it's easy. But I'm glad to finally see research and articles on passwords that recognize human limitations in this world of so many accounts. Take-away for site developers: don't force yet another account and password on your poor users - you'll both be screwed. Use single-sign on via a choice of g+, facebook, etc.
@nealmcb oh, definitely. and definitely. And definitely :-)
16:00
@RoryAlsop Where else?
and, if you do need your own set of accounts for whatever reason, support your users' choice of usability.
@nealmcb the challenge I've seen with companies using 3rd party services in that way is that most of their customers will have signed up for several of them and won't be able to remember which one they used on a specific occasion. I know that's the problem I've had.
again, that correcthorse xkcd question focused mainly on the usability, even more than the entropy issues.
@nealmcb there was somewhere looking at voting and vote fraud
@RоryMcCune It's also the source of a lot of duplicate SE accounts.
16:03
@RоryMcCune Yeah - been there done that. I guess they will want some way to push a notice out for a given account to clarify which sso option was used. Hmm - is that easy for some ssos?
@nealmcb @FEichinger so one usuability enhancement here (although it comes with a security tradeoff) would be to allow a user to enter an identifier and then tell them if an account exists under any of the systems with that identifier. .. Not perfect as there isn't a unified identifier and obv. allows for username enumeration..
Then the user has to remember something again.
@RоryMcCune I guess many of the sso systems allow the user to go the other way - enumerate the relying-party sites that rely on the sso for the current user. I don't recall any help pages about that on relying-party sites though.
As much as I hate to say it, KeePass or similar is the way to go. We will never, and should never, have a centralized way of authentication. Be that by something the user carries over between multiple SSO providers, or be that by having only one SSO provider (which is still the biggest criticism against openID: Everyone is a fucking openID provider) ... It just won't work in the long run.
@FEichinger well if so I guess that facebook and gmail use email address as an identifier and twitter stores it , so theoretically the site could store the e-mail address against the account and then tell the user the user to input their e-mail address at which point it could tell them what they'd registered with...
16:11
@RоryMcCune Google also provides the user with an email address. Which may not necessarily be the one the user wants or primarily uses.
@nealmcb indeed tricky to make it run in reverse and asking users to check the options would be painful.
I thought about using email for identification, too. But, again, gmail.
@FEichinger Gmail. It's my default option whenever it is available.
I'm screwed if my Gmail account got hacked anyway.
@FEichinger yeah edge case peeps with multiple e-mail addresses (I have 10+) are tricky for this kind of thing, but I'd guess that 90+% of people only have one...
@TerryChia Heck, I also use Gmail across everything. My point is, though, that we can't expect every single user to use Gmail. And we shouldn't.
16:12
@TerryChia 2FA on gmail FTW
@FEichinger Well, one point of the article is that even keepass is overkill for the vast majority of passwords I have. Users have to learn to tune out the many sites that really only want the user to have a password so that the site's content is harder to copy.
@FEichinger Oh yeah, there should definitely be a local fallback.
@RоryMcCune Considering that I've seen people still using hotmail ...
hotmail 4 lyf3
@RоryMcCune only have one.... that they know of.
16:13
@FEichinger well outlook.com is actually pretty good these days :)
@RоryMcCune Indeed. Plus Google is really the last party in the world I'd expect to be compromised.
@Simon Fine, you did it. You're back on my ignore list. I'm tired of this crap.
LOL
and keepass is a single point of vulnerability that can't be used as easily from multiple devices
@nealmcb Why not? I'm using it across 3 devices.
16:13
@FEichinger still? or already again?
@nealmcb yep password managers as point of attack are nasty, so I go for a less used offline one :) less usuability but likely safer...
@AviD I don't think Microsoft issues new hotmail addresses anymore.
@TerryChia compromise at their end would likely be for much higher value targets than me :)
They use @live.* now, I believe.
@FEichinger hmm, oh right they're all outlook.com now.
still the same thing.
@FEichinger or that.
16:14
@RоryMcCune Exactly.
@FEichinger it's @outlook.com now, live as a brand is deprecated
If I have to trust anyone to secure their systems, it would be Google.
@AviD Yes, the same thing. But I've actually seen a living @hotmail.com address the other week.
@RоryMcCune See, I'm not even keeping up with that anymore!
@FEichinger I still have a @hotmail.com in active use.
I use it for all the social media crap.
@FEichinger oooo reeeeelllyyyyy
16:15
@TerryChia or Microsoft. Think what would happen if Microsoft update got compromised....
@TerryChia Just like a shiton of people.
I'm looking at one right now.
newb.
@RоryMcCune Yep.
Actually a Google compromise is just as bad for Chrome users.
@TerryChia its actually my main account.
@RоryMcCune Oh, it didn't? So, these constant reboot requests are for real? God damn.
16:16
They are using its auto update mechanism for a lot of cool stuff.
@AviD ... How's your AOL coming along?
@Simon 'fraid so
@FEichinger thats backwards.
hotmail/outlook.com is like gmail 10 years ago.
Either way, what I was going for is that I'd say a lot of people have at least two email addresses nowadays.
I mean, in popularity.
16:17
Which would mean identifying based on email address is not going to suffice.
@AviD a decent e-mail service?
I'm most definitely not a MS fan but I have to admit the new outlook.com is actually pretty damn good.
@RоryMcCune something to be sought after.
for hipsters.
@AviD outlook.com is for hipsters... damn I'd best tell @marionmccune
@TerryChia p.s. the account management is just as good as google's, likely better.
16:18
If only they can get the 365 and normal thing sorted out properly.
(with the exception of the stupid paswsords restriction.)
@AviD Oh, no arguments there.
Now, if anyone is actually still using a @yahoo.com that's a sin.
@TerryChia oh those just suck.
but then they sucked even back when it was considered mildly popular.
@AviD Yup.
ITT: People thinking their opinion is the ultimate one.
16:21
@TerryChia Setting up keepass sync is another part of the "effort" that users have to factor in. And presumably that implies vulnerability to a server attack, in addition to the local client attack.
@nealmcb Presumably any user that cares enough to use a password manager won't find that to be a problem.
The DB should be encrypted with your password anyway.
@TerryChia Sophisticated users are a different use case. What do we recommend to the masses?
@TerryChia passphrase
@nealmcb give up.
^
Seriously, the masses just do not care.
That's the main problem.
or better yet, marry one of the sophisticated users, and s/he will help set you up.
16:24
Ahyup.
Personally, I don't give a crap.
They won't care until it hits them.
And when it does, they'll forget in a week.
@TerryChia well, tbf part oif the reason they dont care is cuz its just too damn much bother.
@AviD Even passwords are too much trouble for them. As evidenced by how popular FB login is.
Well, tough break.
16:25
@TerryChia Passwords suck.
If you make security easy, you also make attacks easy.
@FEichinger No, you have that backwards.
We typically all suffer when the masses get compromised. Part of the reason the masses don't care is they've been fed so much incomprehensible and overly cumbersome bullshit about security
If you make security difficult, it won't be used, and that will make the attacks even easier.
2
Jul 14 at 12:25, by Terry Chia
@M'vy Yeah, I agree. Passwords are broken but it's the best we got.
16:26
> AviD's Rule of Usability: "Security at the expense of usability, comes at the expense of security".
or iow: "Unusable security won't be."
@AviD So, it is true, you can say clever stuff from times to times.
@nealmcb agreed. and again dat xkcd... passwords NEED to be easy to remember AND type.
@Simon o_O
@AviD and a few of them deserve to be reused a lot
@nealmcb well, depending on context, but I would more go with "could be reused" because of the risk model.
then again, in most of those cases there shouldnt even BE a password to begin with.
@AviD Yes, but you won't find a sufficiently (for the masses) usable solution that is also sufficiently secure.
16:29
don't make me work harder just so you have an easier job protecting your stuff.
@FEichinger oh I agree. and that's what really sucks.
3 mins ago, by Terry Chia
Jul 14 at 12:25, by Terry Chia
@M'vy Yeah, I agree. Passwords are broken but it's the best we got.
14 secs ago, by AviD
3 mins ago, by Terry Chia
Jul 14 at 12:25, by Terry Chia
@M'vy Yeah, I agree. Passwords are broken but it's the best we got.
@FEichinger Crack that problem and you have a billion dollar company in your hands.
Give me 10 minutes.
I just got an idea, actually: authentication by farting.
@Simon That's vulnerable to replay attacks.
Ok, I'm actually even annoying the fuck out of myself today, I might be back later.
16:34
@TerryChia meh. I could name right now a dozen companies trying to do just that. Snake oil at best.
@AviD I did say "Crack that problem" didn't I? I didn't say anything about fooling idiots into believing you have.
@Simon thats actually a valid form of biometrics.
@TerryChia Yeeaah ... Or we just accept the part where it ain't happenin', yo.
@RoryAlsop ...no
@nealmcb Oh, hello ! It's been a while.
16:46
@ThomasPornin Hello indeed! Glad to see you still active!
I just got an email from some Chinese student (identified as "Miss CHEN Yongsi") who conducts a survey on "online knowledge sharing motivations and behavior" -- because I am a "top stack exchange user". Anybody else here got it ?
Tom Leek did not get the email, but this just tells me that the emails were not gathered from StackExchange themselves.
@ThomasPornin @RоryMcCune and I got it as well.
Hmm, mine is actually from "Vincy Chan".
@TerryChia The email address is "vincychan928" (at Gmail) but this appears to be some nickname. The "participant information sheet" lists the alleged real name.
@ThomasPornin Ah. Yes that's the one.
It looks legit: it does not promise me anything except work.
16:59
@ThomasPornin Me too. But I see no promise that the results will be published openly, or shared with participants.
-1
A: How can my .exe become infected?

KnightOfNiExe's are, by nature, difficult to modify. Someone could replace it with their own program, but it would be neigh impossible to change an existing one so that people downloaded malware. The only way of "changing" an exe that I know of is DLL injection, and even that doesn't precisely CHANGE the p...

:(
Not washing one's hands could do that.
@AJHenderson how in the world did that user get 700 rep -.-
@Nick mostly asking questions it appears
17:39
Hmm, a patch just got sent to LKML to add a getrandom syscall to Linux. That's good news.
@TerryChia wat
@Nick ?
@ThomasPornin I just did too
well, actually at 11:12AM whatever Eastern time currently is
> The other feature provided by this new system call is the ability to
request randomness from the /dev/urandom entropy pool, but to block
until at least 128 bits of entropy has been accumulated in the
/dev/urandom entropy pool.
That's awesome!
were you actually brave enough to try opening it in a VM? It might actually be someone legitimately trying to contact users that have e-mails listed in their profiles
it looks like they used my website's contact me form
so they appear to be doing manual effort to contact people

« first day (1309 days earlier)      last day (3869 days later) »