« first day (1274 days earlier)      last day (3904 days later) » 

14:01
@Lighty About 153000, if we are to believe statistics.
Troll Pornin.
facedesks
14:49
@Kisunminttu they're pretty close but you'd have to be a man to mistake them
the same could be said about @Lighty's avatar
all youse wimen look teh saem
pff
I feel like typing a bunch of sexist stuff.
do it
@kalina Yeah I didn't really see it when I looked with my phone
14:50
No, I don't wanna go down to your level.
I'm not being sexist, I'm merely mentioning established facts
women pay more attention to the minor details
therefore we don't get confused
@Simon is this @Simon, not wanting to go down?
at least by the avatars in this instance
not in general
@Simon are you calling me short?
All I'm saying is that I like turtles.
at the moment you least expect it, I will be there, to say "boo"
14:52
Your face would be enough to scare me off.
my face would cause you to fall in love
HA!
inlove with a hammer..
@kalina stop flirting with @Simon.
I'm not flirting with simon...
ewww
14:53
39 secs ago, by kalina
my face would cause you to fall in love
that's not flirting
that's biological field notes
You must be very desperate to flirt with me.
4
flirty flirting is flirting.
I'm just going to delete my account
hey @FEichinger! @kalina is flirting with @Simon.
3
14:54
rofl
hehehe
plan backfires
he's totally into it, although I think when he thought threesome he thought two girls
hehe, they always do, right?
always
YOU, out of everyone, would do it with 2 dudes?
I hope you realize that would end up in a very disrespectful thing.
14:55
are you kidding
she maybe meant the ther guy getting nailed by the guy while kalina watches while smoking weed
you must think that I am submissive
I find that very hard to believe
hands kalina a whip
OKAAAY Imma just remind you all that there is a very thin line, and you are getting pretty darn close to it.
like @kalina and @Simon.
rofl
@AviD You're on fire today.
14:57
hifives @Simon
we broke the AviD alarm
2
@Simon Me?? Wait till you actually meet @kalina.
yay
wat
oh yeah, AviD and I met, it was hot
@kalina ahh, young love, frolicking in the sunshine, breaking things together...
14:58
like... literally 30 degrees C and above the entire time I was there
nope, you're all still stuck on the last conversation
this whole convo, formatted in one picture
what a waste
@kalina huh? I missed it?
still stuck on the last conversation
@Lighty Does that lady remind anyone else of something made by Jim Henson? I can't quite put my finger on it.
14:59
I should come to accept it I guess, hanging around all you old people, of course you're slow
either way, uncool dude.
MOAR COWBELL
i think i'll go home and rest before this place explodes from puns, sexual jokes and @AviD strangling @kalina and @Simon
@AviD Neither. I'm talking about her face.
@AviD is strangling us? There's your threesome, @kalina.
15:00
naw thats @FEichinger business.
erotic asphyxiation
nice
heh.
I like it.
wat
:P
killing spree
but im off now, have fun AviD
ah, the sound of AviD's alarm burning out
15:02
....
I find that euphemism highly inappropriate, in this context.
I... what?
It's really easy to offend old people, it seems.
apparently so
"highly inappropriate" != "offended".
either that or the bluntness of the conversation has left him compromised
swiftly changing subject
this cake smelt too nice
I know you're supposed to wait but I couldn't help myself
15:06
Burning your mouth with cake, @kalina ?
a little
but it's totally worth it
I love this track sooo much.
damn the euphemisms here are getting a bit out of hand lately.
no
euphemisms? In the DMZ?
That sounds highly unlikely
Jun 3 at 12:50, by AviD
@TerryChia heh, you just made "euphemism" into a euphemism.
15:09
oh so by euphemisms you meant penis?
heh. no.
oh, ok
@kalina This word has been coming out of your mouth quite often lately, I think you're doing it wrong.
I FORGET WORDS, HELP
I am using "penis" as a replacement word for "euphemism"
@Simon I know what you are about to say - and don't. Just don't.
15:11
what is he about to say?
you can't claim to know what he's about to say and then deny us from knowing if you were right or not
...
okay, I don't know. Either way, we are better off not hearing what it was.
it's fine, I'm bored now anyway
this conversation was not as exciting as it could have been
fine. Something useful then:
2
Coffee

Proposed Q&A site for sharing knowledge concerning brewing appliances, modifications, methods, techniques, coffee blends, roasting and grinding. Everything related to the coffee world. Coffee is pleasure and science!

Currently in commitment.

huh.
15:15
I don't use other SE sites
there ya go.
technically I don't use t his one either... I don't use an y SE sites
@AviD I didn't need to say more, you all got what I meant.
@AviD Coffee is soooo douchy.
hot coffee
I prefer tea when I am high
15:55
@AviD Ah, I'm not worried. She's just playing with him.
"him" == @Simon or @FEichinger?
probably both.
@AviD Tsk!
Hey, we've all been there.
Weeelll, I haven't, but I'm sure most have been.
Weeellll, not @RoryAlsop, I'm sure.
Weeelll, @Adnan was probably there, but on the other side of things.
wat
16:20
Time to listen to blink-182's Greatest Hits.
16:33
@Simon Blink-182 had hits? Plural? Or even a hit for that matter?
@Xander You wouldn't understand. Your generation never does.
^ Well said.
@DavidFreitag Oh well. I guess it's all fine, just so long as you kids stay off my lawn.
That I cannot promise.
I'm really not that old. I don't even have kids as old as you are.
16:37
@Xander That's not the point.
You were probably around my age when their music was getting popular, and that is the point.
@DavidFreitag Huh. Will you look at that. They've sold 35 million albums. Who knew?
At least 35M people.
@Simon To be perfectly pedantic, 35 million people each knew that they had sold at least 1 album.
@Xander I bet 99% were to people that are my age. The last 1% or so was people lost on iTunes.
@DavidFreitag That is a distinct possibility.
16:48
@Xander For me, at least, Blink-182 is pure nostalgia.
@DavidFreitag Ah, that makes sense.
@AviD Yeah, you know me.. I like being on the other side.
It's by no means good. But every now and then if i catch the hint of one of their songs I get nostalgic and go on a week long binge.
@DavidFreitag Yuuuuup. You gotta be careful with those songs, nostalgia can you hit you real hard.
Thing is I don't much of those days, except the simplicity and that's quite something.
@Simon Heh, it's funny. My memory is seriously borked. I don't remember anything from back then, but yet I still get nostalgic.
16:54
I know, it's pretty much the same for me too.
@DavidFreitag Sure. I feel the same way about early Depeche Mode, and Sir-Mix-a-Lot.
I just remember the vibe.
It seems like knowing that something happened instead of remembering what happened is good enough.
Will I dare to listen to Sum 41? We'll see.
And if I'm crazy enough, there will be some The Offspring
17:10
I had a phone interview yesterday. I fit their needs exactly, and I have the qualifications and experience they are looking for. Even I thought it would be a great fit
They asked how much salary I was expected and I told them what I was being paid now, and they choked
they were hoping to pay half of what I am getting paid now
they shut down the intrview right then and there because they had no intention of even trying to compete with my salary
according to all industry metrics, I'm in the middle of the expected range ....
I'm seeing a lot of job postings where they want an advanced IT sec pro, but offering peanuts
perhaps the 'IT Sec worker shortage' is created by employers?
I could make more money programming, and I am FAR from a programmer
What's going on with employers out there?
17:47
@schroeder yeah in my opinion "shortage" means "shortage at the salaries we're offering"
Don't know about other parts of sec. but I'm seeing day rates for testing be around the same for that last 10 years so down in real terms
heck my time got charged out higher when I was an IT consultant 15 years ago!
I reckon testing will split significantly out into those who are CBEST, CREST etc and those who do commodity testing
@RоryMcCune It seems to me that when you are writing company policy, presenting reports directly to senior management, and acting as the sentinel against the invading hordes, one should be paid more than an entry-level programmer
@schroeder you would like to think wouldn't you. Consultancy is better in that sec. cons is v. heavily dependent on the staff (well for boutiques anyway) but corp is less good
@RoryAlsop yeah there's already been a split of some ex-testers in to inc. response/forensics, and CBEST will pull people off into red-teaming and the like. Will be interesting to see if there start being mandatory experience/qual req. for testers to call themselves testers...
@RoryAlsop BTW saw the nice bit of Sec.SE advertising in the Daily Record :)
18:03
@RоryMcCune know any sec cons hiring in the UK? :)
@schroeder probably most of them :) Cigital will be I reckon, if you like software security
@schroeder My opinion is that if programming was not entrusted to "entry-level" programmers, we would be better off against invading hordes.
3
@schroeder if you're into testing, NCC are always hiring
and I'll bet the other uk large consultancies will be too
@schroeder and ioactive that's another one to look at in London
@RоryMcCune looking at all these now
Since all browsers and web servers use port 80 to communicate on, there's an underlying system that sorts out the traffic between different machines on the same Local Area Network. Does anyone know what that process is called?
18:10
@schroeder ok so if you want some other names who I know of and seem quite good (i.e. I know people who work there who are good and seem to enjoy it) Portcullis security (who employ @polynomial amongst others) Context IS, MWR Security. There's also the Big-4 (EY/PWC/KPMG/Deloittes) but if I'm honest I wouldn't recommend them :)
@RobertHarvey Switching, ARP ?
@RobertHarvey networking layer: IP addresses
How does the web server know which local IP address it is communicating with?
Or is it a local TCP port?
@RobertHarvey the sender IP is included in the packet
So when I do a POST in my browser, the local IP goes along with it to the remote web server?
So that it knows who to respond to?
@RobertHarvey unless overwritten by a service along the way
@RobertHarvey there is also the x-forwarded-for process in http that can trace back to the origin
18:14
OK. For some reason I thought the router held a table that translated web requests into local traffic.
@RobertHarvey it does - but what do you mean by 'local traffic' ?
@RobertHarvey Depends on how it's configured. Usually you have an NAPT router which does network address and port translation.
On a network utilizing NAT, a web server would see everyone at the same IP address.
So there is some sort of disambiguation that occurs.
Bored
bored
It's why if you take two computers connected to the same external facing router and go to whatismyip.com the external ip should be the same.
18:17
B0r3D
Boooooooooo...
...reeeeeeeeeed
@kalina Compose one of those million ideas you have floating around so I can listen to it.
@RobertHarvey Oh, you ask for NAT ?
Blah
In a TCP connection, there are two ports. The one on the server side will be 80.
The NATting router will use the other one for disambiguation.
Namely, when client 1 talks to external server on port 80, the NAT router modifies the outgoing packets to use the router IP as source address, and 5001 as client-side port.
The router remembers that "5001" is "connection from client 1"
If client 2 opens a connection, the NAT router will use port 5002.
and so on
Would that be considered Port Forwarding, or is that something else?
we usually use the term "Port Forwarding" for the other direction: to keep a server on the local network, reachable from the outside.
OK. And it doesn't have to be a web browser, right? Any internal computer that originates a connection to any external resource would maintain a connection through the router in the same fashion?
@RobertHarvey NAT works for TCP (and for UDP), regardless of what goes into the packets.
Some routers, though, are configured to do NAT only for some specific ports, because the sysadmin believes that punishing users is a good way to win their friendship and cooperation.
2
So basically the router keeps a pool of ports for this purpose, presumably releasing a given port after some period of inactivity?
@RobertHarvey You can believe @ThomasPornin's story if you like. Or you can believe (as I like to) that each router comes with a little man inside, whose job is to stand there and wait for packets to come pouring in through the WAN port, catch each one, then fling it back out the correct port on the LAN side. Replace "little man" with "invisible faerie" if you're using WiFi.
18:26
@ThomasPornin I thought that was because all those other ports were insecure and only HTTP(S) could be trusted?
@ThomasPornin well the average user will just know it doesn't work and then the sysadmin will be their hero when they make it work
@RobertHarvey Yes. Keeping the pool size under control is the main reason why routers kill off inactive TCP connections.
@Xander That's as good a theory as any. I'm personally fond of pixie dust.
@ThomasPornin Thanks. The Wikipedia article on NAT is fairly opaque.
NAT is a fun concept. Not too hard once you understand it, but can be tricky to get to that point
kind of like SSL
So I've learned three things today. I've learned a little bit about NAT, some sysadmins get bored with conversations about fundamentals, and other sysadmins prefer pixie dust to accomplish their work.
3
18:52
@schroeder @RоryMcCune the shortage isnt in the workers, its a shortage of talent.
and for that matter, there is a shortage of good places to work.
Interesting how those two facts complement each other.
@AviD ah yes but in market theory, that shortage would drive up the salarys paid to talented people, drawing them in from other lines of work.....
@AviD I've always thought the quality/env is quite a bit more important than flat salary
I have seen some companies who get that
testing companies mainly
@RоryMcCune no, because see my point#2: they dont understand talent, and dont know how to draw it in.
@RоryMcCune oh absolutely - but it often goes together, with few exceptions.
bad places to work will usually not appreciate talent, and refuse to pay the appropriate premium - or even a decent salary range, for that matter.
and great places to work will appreciate that, and budget allowing, will pay a premium for real talent.
@AviD so broken market then. Yeah I'd agree with that trying to get buyers to differentiate on anything bar cost is tricky..
the employment market really is so broken. I still see them pretending they are doing a favor by bothering to interview you.
@AviD heh
18:59
@RoryAlsop I would say a 3-way split: commodity / certified / high-end. At the higher end, you would want to pay for real innovative quality, not just an "okay we tested you". Of course those markets that are regulated are not relevant to this...
@AviD yeah with CBEST as (i'd expect) it'll be live testing of critical production banking systems, the cost will need to be a lot higher to offset the risk if nothing else...
@RоryMcCune thats a good point, risk + insurance + certification fees... but there is another, high end market that slides past the banking systems and need for government regulation, around e.g. tech companies and such.
those are also usually a better judge of quality, so they dont need the certs...
@AviD yeah, you'd hope that all these $billion companies who totally rely on the security of their websites would have a lot of testing being done.......
@RоryMcCune well not WhatsApp. but most of the others...
@RоryMcCune Tests ? Who needs tests ? There are end-users for that.
19:04
@AviD poss. although with a lot of them you'd never know it from their websites and the quality/amount of security info. they put up there...
true
doooooooooooooooooommmmmeed
... No
19:19
@RоryMcCune More like Bender.
@kalina more like that?
More like that
20:01
Here's an odd networking issue: Users going through load balancer and using TLSv1 end up with tons of retries, but users who connect directly to web server do not. Users through the LB using SSLv3 do not get retries. LB is performing ssl off-loading. Am I looking at broken TLSv1 implementation on LB?
A surgeon went to check on his patient after an operation.
"You'll be fine," he said.
She asked ...
“How long will it be before I am able to have a normal sex life again doctor?"
The surgeon seemed to pause, and a small tear ran down his cheek from the corner of his eye, which alarmed the girl.
"What's the matter Doctor? I will be all right, won't I?"
He replied ...
“Yes, you'll be fine. It's just that no one has ever asked me that after having their tonsils out."
6
 
1 hour later…
21:29
And, I learn something valuable from Twitter tonight.
PSA to Americans: Don’t drive in Scotland. Driving in Scotland: not for you.
@Xander Heh, why's that?
@DavidFreitag Click though and read the whole thread.
@Xander He wouldn't have to worry if he rented a marauder.
@DavidFreitag Do they rent those?
@Xander I'm sure you could find one.
21:38
over on Unix & Linux, we're talking about men putting their hands on their balls

« first day (1274 days earlier)      last day (3904 days later) »