also @kalina, you may be surprised to learn that many people do quite a lot about it when they can/when they see it/hear of it, but in many cases they don't even hear about it
Since the future of TrueCrypt appears to be still unclear, I figured I'd try to get my stuff migrated into BitLocker at least for the time being. I nearly never have to access my encrypted data from anything that's not BitLocker-capable, so cross-platform compatibility isn't a big deal to me at t...
no, it's ours ... only this week I saw two times some heated discussion over what turned out to be nothing ... frankly, I rather stood clear until it settled
@kalina really, my browser will crash if I load all those n-thousand messages ... there was one flag on a new visitor, and some hooplas over much ado about nothing
@kalina Generally I agree, but here is an example of adding an otherwise unnecessary limitation to the program. (Or at least unnecessary as far as I'm aware.) That's why I'm asking if anyone knows of an actual technical limitation the developers are trying to keep us from hitting.
@TildalWave well sorry that my arrival here coincided with a massive burst in activity
if my activity is a problem, you'll be happy to know that in a few weeks once I can hear again properly that I will be going back to simply not being here
@Adnan re that suggested edit review, not accepting it as "too minor" is now kinda a moot point since the removal of the max revisions till community wiki cap ... I now only use it if I intentionally wanna be vague with the reasons for not accepting an edit ;)
Okay, here is a logic / data analysis quiz: What is the fewest number of people here, and who, that need to be kicked out of the chatroom to get rid of the most crap? Looking for an optimal answer here, "most crap" being defined both in quantity and (lack of) quality.
