> Because I don't have an ARM64 processor and because there seems to be an issue with using the build to build an ARM output, this makes things a bit more complicated so before we go to the trouble, I want to confirm this is a working version of ARM64 build. If any of you can confirm that this is working, we can look into integrating this in the build process.

This is the setup file as a zip since GitHub doesn't allow uploading exe file directly. Unzip it then run the setup. This will not run

> hey @bclothier thank for this. I have attempted to get this working , but the COM addin does not seem to want to load. The installer runs fine , but I get "rubberduck add-in failed to load" error when launching the IDE.
I have tried installing for single user as well as all users. I was able to run the .bat file sucessfully but no change in the error message .
I also tried to run the regasm command from the the troubleshooting guide , and it resulted in a "rubberduck.dll is not a valid

> hey @bclothier thanks for the zip.
Same thing here. I installed it as administrator, without problem. Then got the following error message when opening VBA or going to the add-in manager :

<img width="330" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65823953/211180783-ed50747a-9063-4428-9eae-af9ff982c8d9.png">

on Microsoft® Excel® for Microsoft 365 MSO (Version 2211 Build 16.0.15831.20202) 64-bit

> I did some research and one thing I noticed is that the Rubberduck's DLL files are reported as ARM64 so that's right. I determined this using [ROM Properties](https://github.com/GerbilSoft/rom-properties). However, the dependent DLLs that aren't owned by Rubberduck does not appear to be generated as ARM64. I do not know if that's a factor but if the dependent DLLs fail to load due to incompatibility, that might be why.

Furthermore, Rubberduck depends on [Easyhook](https://github.com/EasyHoo

> Hi guys! I am just getting started with using Visual Studio just for the purpose to help you guys somehow and to getting involved in the project as a thanks message for all your hard work.

I just added a few Spanish translations (which is my native language) just to make sure I am not messing anything up. If you guys can verify that I did the right thing. Then, I have the green light to put more work into it and create other pull requests later.

Please let me know if I need to do somethi

> Hy @bclothier, I also installed the Rubberduck ARM64 setup, so far have the same issue.
Don't know any details maybe this screenshot tells you more to te problem:


It displays as loaded but missing extension ... ?

Microsoft® Excel® 2016 MSO (16.0.14332.20431) 64-bit

Thanks & Cheers
Zoltan.

> Hy @bclothier, I also installed the Rubberduck ARM64 setup, so far have the same issue.
Don't know any details maybe this screenshot tells you more to te problem:


It displays as loaded but missing extension ... ?

*Edit:
Also checked the VBIDE's Tools -> References -> Rubberduck.x64.tlb

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25910991/211184794-daeb5054-957a-4

> Ok, so I got the confirmation that yes, `EasyHook` indeed can only run on x86 architecture and we would need to get an ARM build of `EasyHook` before we can then run Rubberduck on ARM. In the light of that information, we're effectively blocked on this until `EasyHook` can provide an ARM build.

Incidentally, it should be pointed out that Rubberduck has a number of other dependencies as well. For example, the [Castle Windsor](https://github.com/castleproject/Windsor) makes no mention of any

> @bclothier Thanks for efforts , unfortunate that external dependencies are blocking this.

A quick look at the easyhook repo shows that this has been discussed since the ARM based WinRT came out (7 yrs ago!) and there was never a resolution.

Maybe with the introduction of the M series hardware there will be more interest in ARM compatibility.

I have Win64 resources to run things in case , but have been trying to reduce my machine sprawl and have been moving to the MBP with parallels for Wi

> Thanks @bclothier for enlightment.

Have some of you found Rubberduck replacement solution, by any chance, running on ARM ? Even paying product ?