« first day (3059 days earlier)      last day (121 days later) » 

00:05
REFRESH!
[Minesweeper] 134 Games Played. 86 Bombs Used. 15611 Moves Performed. 10 New Users
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 844 additions. 204 deletions. 7 commits. 1 issues closed. 7 issue comments
[Rubberduck] 2 Synchronizations
@Duga that one was on GitHub
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit b3f027df on next: 97.58% (target 0.00%)
 
10 hours later…
11:28
Hey, @Duga, what does 97.58% (target 0.00%) mean? That doesn't look quite right...
 
2 hours later…
13:11
@Duga @MathieuGuindon So you figured it out?
 
2 hours later…
14:57
 
3 hours later…
17:46
@SimonForsberg yep! ..just had to forget about serializing the json payload, there was no easy way to come up with object properties named after some string value in a strongly-typed world, so I'm just building the payload with string interpolation.
@MathieuGuindon I've made progress on the 'numerous' inspection results regarding issue described in #6039. Hope to have a PR soon-ish to explain/describe the issue. Traveling atm, so it might be tomorrow or the next day.
 
3 hours later…
20:30
> **Rubberduck version information**

Version 2.5.2.6059
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.19042.0, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office 2016 x64
Host Version: 16.0.4810.1000
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE


**Description**
The inspection "ConstantNotUsed" is triggered when as constant is used only in declaring an array variable (see below).

**To Reproduce**
```
Sub test()
Const MY_CONST As Byte = 5
Dim tmpArr(1 To MY_CONST) As Excel.CheckBox ' triggers insp
21:08
@Duga I guess we do not resolve references in variable declarations at all.
Obviously, the described scenario is the only possibility to have a reference there.
21:21
Hm, we actually resolve the array bounds. I wonder what goes wrong in the inspection.
22:05
Sync w/upstream (#255)

Co-authored-by: IvenBach <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Brian Zenger <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: bclothier <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Clemens Lieb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Waigel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rubberduck Release Bot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Doerner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: do
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 5254ade3 to next: Merge branch 'next' of github.com/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck into next
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 5c5f20e0 to next: Merge branch 'next' of github.com/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck into next
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 78353d92 to next: hit github api instead of website for main/next tags; rename version check service.
Merge pull request #6037 from retailcoder/versioncheckservice

Version check service
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 78353d92 on next: 97.34% (target 0.00%)
> **Rubberduck version information**
```text
Version 2.5.2.5906
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.22621.0, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office x64
Host Version: 16.0.15629.20208
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE
```

**Description**
In a function of mine (shown below), I set the function's return value to an instance of some class module in my project, but then I call a sub on that instance before finishing. This causes Rubberduck to erroneously believe that I'm discarding a function return value
 
1 hour later…
23:49
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 1660 stars vs. [decalage2/oletools] 2236 stars

« first day (3059 days earlier)      last day (121 days later) »