I remember my minor niggle with the project explorer, it's that you can't double-click to see userform UI design like you can in the old project explorer.
@MathieuGuindon If I'm understanding you correctly, yes. I just followed the No Folder Annotations inspection result and annotated all of my medical file classes into a Fixes folder or Reports folder
and inside those two folders, the class modules are no longer sorted alphabetically even when sorting by name, and even after fiddling
Different issue, I'm using the Quick Fix for "parameter is never used" and getting the Quick Fix Application Failure - Failed to apply quick fix even though it seems like everything actually went okay.
"We are a massive organization of 35,000+ employees of varying tech savvy with a ton of protected health information on hand. We have locked down our environment to reduce risk."
I'm grateful they didn't block SE chat, otherwise I'd be protesting that "I use SE for coding mentorship" and they'd be like "that's funny because you spend 95% of your SE chat activity on This Is Fine"
I don't know who (@Comintern?) or when it was implemented, but having the "Fix" menu available via right click in the CI pane is a major bonus!!! (Especially since the :checkmark: Fix text still does not look like a dropdown option at all)
@FreeMan Yeah, that makes sense. Since I have to specifically push each update through a corporate process I only do the minor/major releases, not the point releases.
One time I linked them to the GitHub release page instead of the page for the specific release page and the packaging person honestly needed help finding the release page even though I included the release version number in my request
@Vogel612 Seeing as how they weren't able to find a GitHub release page given the version number, I'm not confident they're super capable of reviewing the diff. I'm not sure what their minor version update process is exactly.
once to obtain the general settings for splash screen and the settings for experimental features and then again when first hitting the settings after the initial start
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4924?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#4924](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4924?src=pr&el=desc) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/63e529a2bd25f73822bcea037c83b4001b5aa800?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `0.01%`. > The diff coverage is `83.81%`.