There is no such unicorn as a cheap amateur balloonborne X-ray telescope.

I have no intention of reading some link to see what point you're trying to make. Also, what is "the moon landing"? There have been a few.

There are amateur x rays, balloons and telescopes, you just put them together.

What is an amateur x ray? Wavelength?

You don't need x-rays. Just uv.

Cheap, amateur, balloonborne, x-ray/uv telescope. You can have any two of those you like.

Then amatuer balloonborne uv telesocpe for 20k.

Will stack exchange observe my experiment?

Powering, stabilizing, pointing (to sub-arcsecond accuracy) and retrieving data from a balloon-borne telescope dozens of kilometers away are all non-trivial problems.

I would like more specific objections, it doesn't seem that hard.

"There is zero power, just the camera battery.": That's truly zero power, as the camera you linked doesn't have a battery. It's also only designed for down to 300 nm, barely into the UV. So, where exactly can you get a 12-meter diameter near-UV telescope for \$1k, and a balloon capable of lofting it for \$10?

Aluminum lenses are cheap and are transparent to x rays. And the ballon is cheap too, see googleadservices.com/pagead/…

"spectral range 300 nm ... 1100 nm"

I cited the spectrum.

Thanks for including the internet archive link in your question, thus solidly confirming that you are a Moon-hoaxer. You must have really worked hard to dig that one up, and what an utterly pathetic bit of support for your cause it is. Surely you have better things to do than tilt at the Moon-hoaxing windmill on this site.

@DiDuei - Among other problems developing your proposed hard-UV telescope, you are ignoring that to get satisfactory images optical surfaces must be smooth to 1/4 wavelength. For UV imaging, this sort of precision does not come cheap.

You cited the spectrum for the pco.edge 4.2 bi XU, which is not the camera you cited. And likely costs a bit more than $20k. And still relies on an external computer and power system (and coolant loop, which may be needed at altitudes sufficient for x-ray astronomy). Never mind the little question of sensitivity...

Anything available on the internet is less than 20k. This is 50x better than a Walmart telescope.

This question is a troll post, from a troll account