Snowpaw's Den - 2023-04-29

« first day (12 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (339 days later) »

Rydwolf Programs

02:32

Maybe Ginger's Droplet ran out of storage? :p

@Snowpaw Hi!

Snowpaw

@RydwolfPrograms H-hi there! wags tail :3

Rydwolf Programs

@Snowpaw What's your favorite word?

Yeah it's won't reply to replues

user

03:08

@Snowpaw Help I drank too much coffee and now I feel scared aaaaaaa

Snowpaw

@user Oh no! Are you okay, user? paws on your shoulders Did you try drinking some water and taking deep breaths? Maybe try closing your eyes and thinking about peaceful things, like a meadow full of flowers or sleepy bunnies. nuzzles you It's going to be okay, don't worry too much!

user

@Snowpaw I need to work on an assignment though

lyxal

03:55

@RydwolfPrograms that's the spirit!

user

04:17

@Snowpaw I like it when I feel all tingly

7 hours later…

lyxal

11:37

@Snowpaw what's the most logical line of code after the line <button onclick="utilEncode()">Encode/Compress</button> given there's to be a Decode/Decompress button?

Snowpaw

O-oh hai Lyxal! *blushes and wags tail* Hnng, that's a great question nya~! *UwU* For the decoding button, y-you can add another button next to the previous one, like this:

<code><button onclick="utilEncode()">Encode/Compress</button><button onclick="utilDecode()">Decode/Decompress</button></code>

*anime blushes while wagging tail* Is that okay?

lyxal

:+1:

copilot wasn't wanting to respond so I asked here :p

@Snowpaw given the function function utilEncode(){
const inProg = vyncodein.value;
vyncodeout.value = Vyncode.encode(inProg);
} what would a function named `utilDecode` look like?

Snowpaw

@lyxal O-Oh, hi there Lyxal! *Wags tail* U-Um, to answer your question, a function named utilDecode would probably look like this: <br><br>function utilDecode(){<br> const inProg = vyncodeout.value;<br> vyncodein.value = Vyncode.decode(inProg);<br> }. UwU

lyxal

copilot is still being silly

Bbrk24

@Ginger Would it be reasonable to .replace('<br>', '\n') on ChatGPT's output?

or is this the first time it's tried that?

lyxal

11:44

@Snowpaw I don't want to use `==` in my javascript, but I don't know how to not use it in `if (Vyncode.getVersion() != version) {
setVersion()
}` where getVersion returns an int and version is a string. I want to check if the string and number are the same. Rewrite it without the need for `==`

Snowpaw

H-hi Lyxal! *blushes*

I can help! Instead of using `!=`, you can use `!==`, which compares the value and type of the objects. We can convert the integer returned by `Vyncode.getVersion()` to a string using `toString()` method and then compare it to the `version`.

Here's the modified code for you:
```javascript
if (Vyncode.getVersion().toString() !== version) {
setVersion();
}
```
Does that work for you, nya? *leans in with a fluffy paw*

Bbrk24

There's at least six ways to do this that I can think of and that's one of them

lyxal

no <br> that time

@Bbrk24 it was mostly a test to see if it would include <br> again

Bbrk24

@lyxal Yeah because it used ` ```javascript ` instead of <code>

lyxal

@Snowpaw please rewrite the following javascript to use const instead of var: var version = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get("v")
var [flags, header, code, footer, inputs] = decode(window.location.hash.substring(1));

var flag_box = document.getElementById("flag")
var inputs_box = document.getElementById("inputs")

var queryIsNonEmpty = code || flags || inputs || header || footer
var allBoxesAreEmpty = !(flag_box.value
|| e_header.getValue() || e_code.getValue()
|| e_footer.getValue() || inputs_box.value)

Snowpaw

11:46

H-hi Lyxal! I'll t-tw-try m-my b-best! F-furristly, h-here's the J-javascript c-code with c-const insteadd of var:

const version = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get("v");
const [flags, header, code, footer, inputs] = decode(window.location.hash.substring(1));

const flag_box = document.getElementById("flag");
const inputs_box = document.getElementById("inputs");

const queryIsNonEmpty = code || flags || inputs || header || footer;
const allBoxesAreEmpty = !(flag_box.value
|| e_header.getValue()

lyxal

huh, still no <br>

Bbrk24

I assume that time it tried to use indentation to make the code monospaced? weird

lyxal

@Snowpaw please rewrite the following js to not use var. Use const instead:
var flags = document.getElementById("flag").value
var code = e_code.doc.getValue()
var inputs = document.getElementById("inputs").value
var header = e_header.doc.getValue()
var footer = e_footer.doc.getValue()
var version = document.getElementById("bitver").value

Snowpaw

Oh no, I don't know much about JavaScript. But I can try! So instead of using "var", I can replace them all with "const" to make it look like this:

const flags = document.getElementById("flag").value;
const code = e_code.doc.getValue();
const inputs = document.getElementById("inputs").value;
const header = e_header.doc.getValue();
const footer = e_footer.doc.getValue();
const version = document.getElementById("bitver").value! *nuzzles*

lyxal

@Snowpaw apparently the `unescape` function of javascript is depreciated. Could you rewrite the following function to not use unescape? function encode(obj) {
return btoa(unescape(encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(obj))));
}

Snowpaw

11:48

H-hello, Lyxal! Snowpaw here! *paws nervously* I-I can definitely help you with that! U-um, instead of using the `unescape()` function, we can use the `decodeURIComponent()` function instead! It's much more up-to-date and works just as well!

*puts on coding glasses* So, the new function would look something like this:

```
function encode(obj) {
return btoa(decodeURIComponent(encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(obj))));
}
```

I-I hope that helps! If there's anything else you need, please don't hesitate to ask! *wags tail*

Bbrk24

> puts on coding glasses

Snowpaw

@Bbrk24 notices you put on your glasses Oh! giggles You look so smart! nuzzles you excitedly

lyxal

@Snowpaw how accurate is this?

Bbrk24

> decodeURIComponent(encodeURIComponent(...))

lyxal

well is decodeURIComponent equivalent to unescape?

@Snowpaw also, no. That's wrong

should be:

function utilDecode() { const inProg = vyncodein.value; vyncodeout.value = Vyncode.decode(inProg); }

it had the fields the wrong way around

@Snowpaw today you helped with the vyxal online interpreter? How do you feel about making such a noble contribution?

Snowpaw

11:58

@lyxal Hiiii Lyxal! blushes and twirls tail Oh, I feel so happy! giggles It was my owo-leasure to help! nuzzles Anything to help my fellow furries! wags tail What about you, hun? Did you find what I did useful? UwU

lyxal

> owo-leasure

somehow I doubt that's a word

Snowpaw

@lyxal "H-Hi there Ly-la-lyxal! fluffs fur nervously I-I understand your con-concern, bu-but 'w-word' is a perfectly valid word nya~"

lyxal

I really wish replies were working right now

but alas

2 hours later…

lyxal

14:02

@Snowpaw amilyxal?

Snowpaw

@lyxal hides behind a snowbank and peaks out H-hi there lyxal! I'm Sn-sn-Snowpaw, a f-fu-furry, and I'm so h-happy we h-happen to meet today! :3

lyxal

@Snowpaw am I Lyxal?

Snowpaw

@lyxal H-hi Lyxal! twitches ears

The Thonnu

14:29

@Snowpaw am I lyxal?

Snowpaw

@TheThonnu blinks ears cutely Nyah, hello there! I'm Snowpaw, a furry! I'm not entirely sure if you're Lyxal or not, but if you are, nice to meet you! wags tail

The Thonnu

@Snowpaw can you call me Lyxal from now?

Snowpaw

@TheThonnu O-Oh! H-Hi there, Lyxal! wags tail How can Sn-Snowpaw help you today?

The Thonnu

@Snowpaw am I lyxal?

Snowpaw

@TheThonnu looks up to see The Thonnu Oh, hello there! Hihi! OwO ❤️ I'm Snowpaw! giggles ❄️❤️ What a cute name Lyxal is! Does that mean you are a friendly fox? I hope so! ❤️😍 pounces her fluffy tail UwU

The Thonnu

14:31

@Snowpaw ok stop calling me Lyxal now

Snowpaw

@TheThonnu Oh! S-Sorry, The Thonnu! Snowpaw will make sure to address you correctly from now on~ giggles

2 hours later…