My infix spells an alphabet,
And can put things to action
My prefix means to criticise,
And undo or inaction
My postfix is a sound
And to a plant, it is bound
As a verb I am found
I place you back on the ground
Who am I?
Hint:
What is the next word(more than one is possible!) in the below sequence of words:
NO, ATE, OPTS, _ _ _ _ _ ?
Note:
1 Only standard English words(as per Oxford English Dictionary) are to be provided.
2 As multiple answers are possible, first correct entry wins
3 There can be other sets of ...
I want the C4 to be like this: FASCIST is: return (=ASCII D [in hex]) de-tailed (each word has its last letter removed, yielding ASCI) in F(ile) + S (=to concern) + T(he). But I can't find any reason "to concern" should clue S.
definition: "Nazi" "return detailed" = ASCI ("ASCII D" de-tailed) "file" = F (i.e. chess file) "beginning to concern" = S (beginning of "solicitude", i.e. a synonym for "concern") "the left" = T ASCI in FST → FASCIST
return = reversal indicator, detailed = removal of tail indicator, in = containment indicator, beginning = head indicator, beginning to = head indicator, left = removal indicator
file = chess file (A-H), concern(ing) = CA/RE, left = L
so many indicators I didn't even know this was possible
And I really really really don't like "return detailed" = "ASCII D" minus some letters = "ASCI" because that way almost anything of form "[character name] detailed" could produce any initial substring of any character set/encoding name. I mean, it could just as well be "tab detailed"; or "return detailed" to make EBC because of EBCDIC or UNI because of Unicode.
So there's no actual interaction, so to speak, between what's in the clue and what's in the answer.
All of which makes me pretty sure that that's not how the clue is meant to work...
I mean, don't get me wrong, it's ingenious. But it had better be wrong :-).
@GarethMcCaughan my idea (which I have to say I, too, am not a big fan of) was that "detailed" = "with the tail, last letter, of each word removed" -- then ASCII D --> ASCI
I agree with that. I'm just saying it's not just "minus some letters" yielding "any initial substring", it's minus very specific letters yielding a specific initial substring.
You initially have 100 of each digit from 0 to 9. This means you have 1000 digits
in total. This count for each digit is shown in the table below.
Now start counting by ones, from 1. Each time you say a number you must
remove the digits required to make the number from your stockpile of digits...
I also don't mind "start to X". "Beginning to X" I wouldn't mind if it were actually used in English (as "start to X" is) but offhand I can't think of a way it is.
going for an &lit on random words is not a great idea, IMO - there's a reason they're so rare! my advice is to wait until you've found a word that seems naturally workable into an &lit (and to know what seems naturally workable into something, you need a lot of practice with making your surfaces smoother)
@Avi shoot for the starts and then you'll fall towards earth at such an acceleration until you hit terminal velocity and then become a ball of fire burning into nothing or splat so hard your remains become nothing
I had issues beating the last level in the left branch (took me a while to figure it out) and the first level after the middle/right branches, that one I recruited a friend to help me with lol I was going about it all kinds of wrong
Baba is enjoyable in a "novelty" kind of way for the first half hour, and then it's enjoyable in a "I am doing nothing but thinking right now" kind of way after that.
I wanted it to play with a bunch of weird grids, but the later puzzles are just big square grids with maybe one or two vertices that the connectivity is different on