I read this short story back in middle school during my literature class when we were studying about folklore. It was about a moon princess being jealous of her sister sun princess so much that she adorned herself in jewels enough to make the night disappear just so she can shine like her sister....
oh, well, people on the Tavern chat board are currently arguing over some chat kicks given to an user who dared to post a single "RP"(as they defined it) chat message.
so, until they stop posting hundreds of "noise messages" just to discuss if they did right to kick someone for posting just one....
@V2Blast Can you take a look at this rollback in the light of this meta and either chime in on the meta or start a new one? I think it'd be good to discuss editing a bit further.
@nitsua60: I mean, I think my edit pretty clearly falls under the description in @mxyzplk's answer to that meta: "In general your edits shouldn't change the nature of the answer - if you're changing a yes to a no, that's bad. But adding citations, etc., even extensively, doesn't do that." All I did was edit in the reference that the answerer mentioned but never bothered to correct or actually quote.
I just provided the quote that the actual answer relies on as support for its claims (which I didn't edit at all)
@V2Blast I think that what mxy's saying there is like if you added "(SCAG p.123)" after their statement, not putting in the blockquotes. I'm into the getting-kids-to-bed part of my evening--back in a few hours.
Frankly, I think it's such an uncontroversial edit that I don't think it's worth the effort (to me) to bring it up in meta. You or someone else can do so if you'd like.