« first day (5 days earlier)      last day (27 days later) » 

emanresu A
emanresu A
02:10
Still no luck :|
Eman yalpsid
Eman yalpsid
:-|
 
2 hours later…
Eman yalpsid
Eman yalpsid
03:58
:-------------------------|
 
11 hours later…
00Her0
00Her0
14:40
:------------——----------–---------------------------------------------|
Aaaaayyyyyyyy stasoid got it but they said it was broken for bf+. How do we test that?
 
4 hours later…
00Her0
00Her0
18:21
NVM, @whqwert fixed it
How long should I wait for the person who cracked to post a new answer before I do?
(I know it hasn't been nearly long enough yet)
 
5 hours later…
stasoid
stasoid
22:55
@emanresuA Do you also think that the last answer is valid?
00Her0
00Her0
23:18
@emanresuA @stasoid @emanresuA told me earlier that it was allowed (see the message I replied to)
emanresu A
emanresu A
@stasoid As in, ending with an error, or editing it to make it valid? I'd say now that it is valid it's fine...
stasoid
stasoid
@emanresuA Have you tried it? It prints something to stdout after the number. This is different from bf+, which prints error to stderr.
Clarification of the rules: Ending in error is allowed. Printing an error to the same output stream as the number is not allowed.
Currently #16 breaks the answer rules as specified in "I/O clarifications"
emanresu A
emanresu A
23:34
Oh, oops. I'd say it breaks the rules then, as an error is not unavoidable output. Sorry @whqwert
00Her0
00Her0
...What now?
I have an alt #16...
emanresu A
emanresu A
Go ahead and post it, I guess?
Actually maybe don't
Maybe give them time to fix it, I guess?
00Her0
00Her0
@emanresuA Alright, let me know
stasoid
stasoid
23:49
I would like to add next answer. I am waiting for #16 to be fixed or deleted.
00Her0
00Her0
@stasoid fair, since you cracked the previous one
emanresu A
emanresu A
^

« first day (5 days earlier)      last day (27 days later) »