« first day (2 days earlier)      last day (30 days later) » 

00:03
What about it causes jelly to error?
@emanresuA Yes
That sounds useful
Oh wait i meant cause jelly to not error
@00Her0 Jelly barfs on a # at the start of a line for parsing reasons
because # is a quick that needs something to pop
worth mentioning that although it's supposed to pop two things it will let you get away with one, in case it might help to do that
It doesn't matter too much because those lines are never executed
I want to get a C-like lang in at some point
00:13
that could be fun
probably wouldn't be the most serious cop unless someone puts in a bunch of preprocessor directives earlier as a red herring
@SztupY But I'll leave it until you're done
Trying to create something that's a C-like comment and valid in Python / ruby
I'm almost finished
00:41
Done, have fun
01:15
@SztupY to be sure, fdid you only add the first line
BTW is it ok to post another answer without cracking the one before it?
yes, the first line addition is the only change
ok
BTW is it ok to post another answer without cracking the one before it? :: I suppose no
Visited 25 days: Happy, um, 25 day anniversary to, um, nobody...
@SztupY ok
 
1 hour later…
02:39
@Nobody Off not
@SztupY I know exactly what this is and have no idea how to run it.
This is obviously TeX of some sort but there are no good functional compilers
Honestly, have a downvote because of just how painful this is gonna be to test.
02:55
@emanresuA It works with Overleaf if you set it to compile to plain TeX
Huh. where's that setting?
Hm, okay. Still, this kinda wrecked the polyglot IMO - the first characters have to start with that and that removes so many oppurtunities.
yeah
@emanresuA is there any limit on output format
Changed it up a bit so now it should be easier to polyglot
basically you can add any characters before and after the section and it'll be ignored
03:02
Okay, thanks :)
Changing my downvote to an upvote
I'm also looking how I could add it to one of the online TIO like tools
a username is going to win the contest
it's a shame no one took TeX seriously on CodeGolf before :)
I can't really win my own challenge
Else 00HER00 is winning
03:04
@SztupY Hm, is there a script-like compiler?
@SztupY Those changes don't work on the thing I'm using – do they work for you?
they work in full plain TeX mode
How do I do that?
I added notes to the answer
if you can add -ini to the flags of TeX that would help
otherwise the old answer is better as it uses Plain Tex and not Vanilla TeX
Okay :)
03:21
I'll have a look if I can make this working as part of ATO as they already use docker images to run languages
0
A: Add a hidden language to a polyglot

Nobody15. ???, IDC bytes, not cracked +++++++++++++++O\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>14#+iiiiiiiiiokh-\catcode`\#=6\font\m=cmr10\m 14#\end; 4+0#a /z@ MoOMoOMoOMoOMoOMoOMoO print(8-(2*5-3)+(1/2)*10+...

should work
03:39
I can confirm it still passes the TeX version. It did introduce a lot of extra whitespace, but it's allowed
03:58
ok
@SztupY what whitespace, screenshot?
04:16
Started a PR to allow Tex to be run inside ATO: github.com/attempt-this-online/languages/pull/12
04:26
Tysm
@emanresuA wdym
what does that mean
Thank You So Much
nvm
that's why i hate edits my messages don't make sense now
but
™

Google it
Thank you very much

makes a good pun
So... the latest one's some esolang with O, + and - instructions
04:43
Yes
i misread that as "O, +, -, and instructions"
It would be valid in FISHQ9+ if not for the existing FISHQ9+
id assume the >s are also part of it, seeing as theyre very new and plentiful
Yeah, but I can't understand their purpose
@thejonymyster Hint, sort of, but sort of redherring, but sort of
04:46
:thinkin:
if you delete them they would still work in the new lang
Man esolangs search sucks
@emanresuA should be ez
if you know what to search
lol i was getting tripped up by the \s and /s but they were in the last answer
i was like "maybe its some 2d lang where those redirect control flow" lolol
04:47
@thejonymyster lol maybe it is a 2d lang
maybe not
i do have my suspicions of that still
but id be surprised if the slashes were anything to do with it
they dont line up :P
;-) nice
that would be fun though in the future lol
@emanresuA credit to you for my eman
@thejonymyster lol
Can I crack my own answer hahahahaha
nooo wait a week lol
and after a week reveal but dont crack pls
04:58
I think this answer will be cracked in 5 minutes
Nvm
This would work if an interpreter existed
"which was intended to be generic but it didn't. "
grammar
nitpicking but i just think its a funny phrasing
@Emanyalpsid is this a hint :3c
05:07
@thejonymyster no
> This would work if an interpreter existed
@emanresuA almost
05:30
44 mins ago, by emanresu A
Man esolangs search sucks
I just want to search for <code>O</code>, is that too much to ask?
haha yes
if you know what to search, should be easy
If you search the thing you should search there should be 5 search results
And then only one will be obviously correct
and all the others will be obviously wrong
@emanresuA .
@emanresuA ahaha Results 1 – 21 of 665
 
1 hour later…
06:45
"For this language it ends in an error, but that is supposed to be allowed." Is this allowed? I took "stuff unavoidably printed by the interpreter" to mean startup messages, not error.
Soooooooooo close tio.run/##y05N///…
@00Her0 Yep, but ending in an error is allowed by standard rules so I'd say it's allowed
Oh ok I'm new here
It's fine - meta's kinda huge
07:03
@00Her0 so 14 could've been 14
Keg I mean
 
3 hours later…
09:54
TeX is now available on ATO staging: staging.ato.pxeger.com/…
10:19
Oh, cool! Thanks @pxeger
And thank you
11:11
@emanresuA SztupY did most of the work
it maybe the best open-source contribution I've ever received, in fact
:)
Whatever @Emanyalpsid did I'll probably end up writing a rudimentary JS interpreter and yeeting it on DSO
But o/ for now
 
3 hours later…
14:18
Wait why are there two "iiiiiiiiiokh"s in the new answer??
14:50
@Emanyalpsid No, because only #15 has (actually had-looks like nobody changed it to a 1) a '14', #14 just had a '1'
 
5 hours later…
20:12
Wow i guess #15 wasn't as easy as you thought @nobody. It's been 16 hours!
I've been looking for languages with an O command that outputs some integer, but found nothing
hmmmmm

« first day (2 days earlier)      last day (30 days later) »