« first day (5 days earlier)    last day (15 days later) » 

Ellie Kesselman
Ellie Kesselman
13:26
About this, 1) an FOIA request filed by a journalist in Nov 2021. The FDA acknowledged receipt of his request, but didn't respond to inquiries in Feb and April 2022 about the status. Today, May 16 2022, the FDA said, "Your request is pending in the Center For Biologics. I will ask them for a status update." Here's the URL muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/…
Next, the whistleblower filed a lawsuit in February 2022. I don't know how to interpret this as I am not a lawyer "US District Court for Eastern Texas - USA ex rel, Brook Jackson v. Ventavia Research Group - recently unsealed qui tam action against vaccine entities: Pfizer Inc., Icon PLC, and Ventavia Research Group, LLC"
https://www.academia.edu/71772143/US_District_Court_for_Eastern_Texas_USA_ex_rel_Brook_Jackson_v_Ventavia_Research_Group_recently_unsealed_qui_tam_action_against_vaccine_entities_Pfizer_Inc_Icon_PLC_and_Ventavia_Research_Group_LLC
Finally, there is this, which might be the most useful. It is a response to the BMJ article published in November 2021, titled, "How significant is the Ventavia scandal?" (Two short but good paragraphs) bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-18 That's what we want to know!
Oh, and I just noticed that Facebook's fact checker guy got involved, called the BMJ a medical blog, and everyone is all stirred up over that, see here bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rapid-responses
I guess I should ping you @Graviton and @Oddthinking I'm just trying to be helpful, but it seems like this question will be difficult to answer.
In answer to what @CJR asked, the response to the BMJ mentions this: "Your article reports that Ventavia was responsible for 3 out of 153 sites involved in vaccine evaluation and that their work involved "more than 1,000" out of 44,000 participants, i.e. around 2.5%. A recent systematic review and GRADE evaluation of the Pfizer vaccine by a CDC group (cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/covid-19-pfizer-biontech-va...) was very positive about its efficacy and safety....
... What should now happen is for the CDC or a similar non-commercial agency to re-evaluate the evidence after removing the data from Ventavia. There should also be a random audit of data from a sizeable sample of the other 150 sites that were involved in the vaccine's development." bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-18 I don't know if that has happened or not.

« first day (5 days earlier)    last day (15 days later) »