« first day (280 days earlier)      last day (4533 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

00:01
I live in the 8th floor.. the poor cat would have to be stuck here alone almost all day, and I've heard some stories of people forgetting a window opened.. and the cat commiting a sort of suicide
Uh-oh. It's 5 A.M.
Good night, good night.
Or good morning, even.
Good day gig
... more 186 pages of this stupid book to go...
@Gigili Night!
i think i won't be able to finish it today
@Tames Yeah I live in an apartment on the first floor, but it is about 6 metres to the ground from the window sill.
@Tames Is it for an exam?
00:07
I have to answer a questionnaire on it, but it is so low quality that i can't even believe a teacher is requesting this in a university class
and i have to read the whole book to answer the freaking childish questionnaire,
besides this i'll have to do some other papers, to get my grades on this class
it is absurd
do any of you know Carl Rogers?
this is almost magazine psychology
"no need for theory, just accept yourself as you truly are" bulshit
he mentions a little bit of everything, no theoretical framework
a total disaster
in a semester we are studying Heidegger, in the other this
and it is all "phenomenological-existencial psychology"...
if Heidegger saw this, he would be... is there an expression in english for this? moving himself in the tomb?
hahah
He'd turn in his grave.
@Tames That does sound like bullshit.
00:22
a whole semester lost on this
a complete waste of time
That sucks.
look at this
Carl Ransom Rogers (January 8, 1902 – February 4, 1987) was an influential American psychologist and among the founders of the humanistic approach to psychology. Rogers is widely considered to be one of the founding fathers of psychotherapy research and was honored for his pioneering research with the Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions by the American Psychological Association in 1956. The person-centered approach, his own unique approach to understanding personality and human relationships, found wide application in various domains such as psychotherapy and counseling (cli...
this is his "theory"
what theory? only a bunch of propositions based on different knowledge fields
and his own "experience"
Odd.
this is a disaster to psychology. or this is really psychology and then I should agree that psychoanalysis is not psychology
@Cerberus do you like poetry?
i mean.. besides classic hexamers that i've never heard of?
00:42
Sometimes. But only when I'm in the mood. A poem out of nowhere without context usually doesn't work on me.
I gather you like poetry a lot, hehe.
yes. I've even wrote some stuff. now it hardly happens. i went trough a concrete phase, and now i don't even know anymore what it is
What's that?
a picture by Klimt
beautiful isn't it?
this is the complete version
it's called "the tree of life"
he has so many beautiful paintings, it is even hard to chose one to put in here
many of them are very similar, actually
it is like different pictures of the same universe
for example this
and this
it is like he is obsessed with certain forms
Beautiful
quite oedipical even, this relation
the mother and the child, resembling two lovers
his pictures seem like a tribute to feminility and sensuality
so gorgeous
it seems that the characters are always immersed in dreams
01:08
Yeah Klimt is beautiful.
01:43
Haha.
Haha, so you psychologists also enjoy Gödelian jokes?
i don't know about psychologists but psychoanalysts do lol
Lacan makes a lot of reference to Godel, Russell's paradox..
he uses set theory models for many things
Oh, really?
but psychoanalysis is interested in jokes, in general. Freud wrote a whole book on the subject
"O chiste e suas relações com o inconsciente"
01:51
You might like this book
Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (commonly GEB) is a 1979 book by Douglas Hofstadter, described by his publishing company as "a metaphorical fugue on minds and machines in the spirit of Lewis Carroll". On its surface, GEB examines logician Kurt Gödel, artist M. C. Escher and composer Johann Sebastian Bach, discussing common themes in their work and lives. At a deeper level, the book is an exposition of concepts fundamental to mathematics, symmetry, and intelligence. Through illustration and analysis, the book discusses how self-reference and formal rules allow systems to acq...
Lacan comes back to logic all the time
i need to learn more about it
how nice!
What is chiste?
Joke?
Lacan loves the moebius strip and the klein bottle
01:53
Ah.
Joke.. in german it would be "witz" I think
So I do speak Portuguese, hehe.
But it's an archaic word, I think.
In modern Brazilian Portuguese, "piada" is more common.
Do you have a word like gioco? Joçao?
Ah.
Otavio, para o Freud parece ter diferença entre piada e chiste, eu não lembro bem o que é, penso que o chiste tem uma espécie de ruptura com a língua, tipo um jogo de palavras, que a piada não teria
Cerb.. jogo?
01:54
Ah yes.
jogo is game
Ah, so a chiste is a pun, and a piada is a joke in general?
probably, i'm not sure
Portuguese is easy!
@Cerberus hey, you stole the words from my mind.
I was gonna say exactly that!
01:56
Hehe.
we never use "chiste" in regular talk, although it is common in spanish
I must admit I didn't understand the second clause eu não....
but I think Freud's book title must not be "Puns and its relations to the unconscious"
"eu não" - i don't... "eu não lembro" i don't remember
Ah I see.
I don't remember very well what it is/was?
I don't remeber very well what it is
01:57
I wonder where lembro comes from.
OK.
it can be "recordo", but "lembro" is more common
[m] became [l] at some point in history
Lembrar is cognate to remember
@OtavioMacedo thanks for indicating me that book.. I had come across it in the internet, but didn't pay attention. it seems to be freat
Oh!
Funny.
weird
02:00
What is month?
Hmm.
Any idea in what situations m became l?
hm..
And does Spanish have a similar word with l?
we have a word that is "membro".. like member, we say "the arm is a member of the body". maybe some differentiation?
02:01
Oh, hmm.
That probably comes from a different Latin word.
spanish.. no, I don'r remember -> no me recuerdo
Membrum = member; memoria = memory.
Yeah I know that verb. Is it recordar? Or is that Italian, ricordare?
maybe because when i say "i don't remember", it is...
I don't think the phenomenon has to do specifically with m and l.
liliu > líriu, calamelu > caramelo, memorare > membrar > lembrar
how can I say.. like "i wash myself", this 'myself".. we say "não ME lembro", if it was "não me membro", it would sound really bad
02:03
Dissimilation, according to Wikipedia.
like in spanish, it would be "le leche" (milk, masculine), but because of the sound, we say "la leche"
agua - water, is feminine,
but it is said EL agua, because LA agua would sound bad
@OtavioMacedo Umm wait, how is that dissimilation in the change from caramelo to calamelu?
That looks like assimilation?
otavioooo
you did it!
i'm so happy!
@Tames Ohh so it's vowel dissimilation.
thanks!
what is calamelu? i don't know this word..
02:10
Caramel.
No, it's the other way around, from calamelu to caramelu
but when we say caramelo, it may sound as caramelo
Melted sugar.
caramelu
i mean
@OtavioMacedo Huh??
But it is caramel in all other languages too.
02:10
How's it in Latin?
Cerb, Otavio answer my meaningFUL question lol
Eh I don't know.
It may be a newer word.
Let me look it up.
@Tames Congrats!
hahah
congrats to @OtavioMacedo!
@Tames Hope that helps.
02:13
@OtavioMacedo how sweet of you! I know you had to do some research on this
:)
No problem :-)
@OtavioMacedo My dictionary says the origin is uncertain. It names cannamellis first as a possibility, then calamellus second.
Oh, it calls the calamellus option "less likely".
It is in Dutch.
"cana" is the plant where sugar comes from
Yeah, like sugar cane.
mellis maybe "honey"?
02:16
Yes.
Mel, gen. mellis.
My dictionary is from 2004–2009, so it is pretty recent.
it may have to do with the sound of "a" in "ca"... because when you say "cara" it is open, when you say "cana" it is nasal, like ã
...
Could be...
maybe the sound changed and r morphed into n..
It is a possibility.
It seems a very complicated etymology.
Well, your dictionary must be way more trustworthy than Wikipedia
02:20
I think it is.
The authors are very respectable.
So it could have happened the way you suggested.
But we don't know.
So anyway, there is no easy way for me to predict this change, alas.
it is interesting though that it didn't become "caramel" or "canamel", as honey in portuguese is "mel"
and not "melo"
The Latin accusative is also "mel"
@Tames I suppose because they each developed separately in Spanish–Portuguese.
@OtavioMacedo Yup, as with all neuter words in Greek and Latin.
hmm
Nominative and accusative are always formally identical for neuter words.
02:25
maybe it has something to do with it becoming a ver, 'melar", "eu melo", "eu caramelo" rs
And neuter plural always ends on -a.
could it be that it began as a verb?
There were two different nouns already Latin.
So Portuguese must have built on those nouns.
because it sounds likely that if the word was longer, "canamelar", the first 'ã' could change the sound to 'a' (open)
and then, n could change to r
Is there an ã?
02:28
man
how much more speculative can I get
when 'a" is followed by "m" or "n", it is usually a nasal 'a"
like ã
@Tames Yes, that's assimilation.
but.. maybe... considering callamellus...
isn't L and R more closely related in portuguese?
It would be calamellus.
small children frequently swap these letters
there's even a popular comic character with this feature
Yeah they are both liquidae.
Many Asian people cannot distinguish the two.
And I believe they were one hieroglyph in ancient Egyptian too.
02:36
this is beggining to affect me
on the inside
lol
Oh nice.
And I was trying so hard not to think of food!
@Otavio: By the way, I forgot most of what I learned about Aristotle's categories, but is quality the same as form in Aristotle?
do you guys know Kurt Schwitters and his Ursonnaten?
I remember his two main concepts were material/substance and form.
@Tames Hmm never heard of?
The problem is, in each book Aristotle uses a different classification system.
I think you are referring to the four causes
it is so interesting. it is like a sound/musical research on language
let me find the link
02:41
material, formal, final and efficient
@OtavioMacedo Hmm those are the same, yes. But material and form are I believe the most important ones, especially is the comparison with Plato...
it is very interesting. but maybe not very pleasant to some
Maybe the material cause can be linked with quality.
@Tames Hmm I'm afraid that is too advanced for me.
02:44
A wooden chair: is material cause is wood.
As wood has certain qualities, the chair would "inherit" those qualities...
I don't know. Just speculation.
@Cerberus are you listening?
this Schwitters is a wacko
I rather remember about how Aristotle considered each object to exist. It has substance/material, in that it is physical at all. That's all that substance does. Then it has a certain shape or form, which determines what kind of physical object it is, like a chair or a man or a goat. The way I say it, "kind", already implies a similarity to quality. So it has both material and formal existence, necessarily.
dadaist
Hmm yeah, that's not my kind of art.
oh
02:47
I'm too simple for that, hehe.
it is my favorite
it is the simplest form of all!
Like the guy who hung up a loo and proclaimed it art?
I think that was a dadaist?
how simpler can it get?
Heh.
Duchamp is the best
his works are strategical
02:49
Yeah, but the "kind of" relation, it is a species/genus relation.
Duchamp was a chess player
Thus, you are strictly inside the "realm" of substance, not quality.
his work is deeply inspired by language, riddles.. the work of Raymond Roussel..
@OtavioMacedo I don't know...you could say that, but in this case there isn't really a genus.
he said that it is better that visual art is influenced by literature than by other paintings
02:51
Oh, well.
@Tames Yes, that is what I meant.
A chair is a piece of furniture.
this is great
Chair = species, Piece of furniture = genus.
@Tames Guest and ghost are etymologically related.
are they?
02:55
Hmm, thinking again, I'm not sure.
@OtavioMacedo Alright, but I don't think that is related to Aristitle's "form" (probably morphê) as I remember it. But you're right that he is perhaps not very consistent with his terminology, so this is probably a dead end, hehe.
@OtavioMacedo I don't think so.
German Geist / Dutch geest v. Latin hostis.
I think it's guest and host that are related.
From PIE times.
Now I shall have to look it up!
By the way, Dutch has gast v. geest.
So it seems very unlikely.
A guest and a host are the two sides of a relationship.
yes, this i know
this is the essence of the joke, as i see it, like merging (+) with (-), you get a ghost, or an emptiness
or a fantasy
from merging opposites
03:01
Ok, I'm going to bed, my friends.
me too, i'm sleeping already
lol
bbye boys
good night
@OtavioMacedo But but...
You said ghost!
Oh, wait, I missed your line where you said it was guest.
@Tames Nighty night!
According to Kluge (good German dictionary), the PIE origin of ghost/geest etc. is uncertain.
:-*
bye
Sleep well!
Oh, I should go too haha.
Good timing!
 
9 hours later…
12:18
@Cerberus Oh, nothing is certain in this world...
 
3 hours later…
15:29
@Tames "bbye boys"? Are you a girl? Oh nice, I still suck at guessing the users' sex. lol
@Alenanno Why does it necessarily implies that she's female?
@Gigili Just a feeling. I might be wrong though!
You are.
Why are you sure?
I've seen men saying the same thing. I fail to see your point.
Perhaps because you "suck at guessing the users' sex"!
15:34
Ahah
 
1 hour later…
16:47
@Alenanno Yes, she is a girl.
Hi ppl
I've shown my picture! of course some might think it is not real
@Alenanno: Tames is a male name in some places
@Gigili do you think I'm faking it? lol
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (280 days earlier)      last day (4533 days later) »