« first day (279 days earlier)      last day (4534 days later) » 

00:00
—....—
—..—
—.—
——
it is Y or U
Oh, Y.
Didn't think of that one.
/me rules
00:01
@Tames Wowie! Very nice.
lol
but don't ask me to do it again hahah
you said you had done 100% on number 13, you liar!
Hah, I have only one level better than you.
@Tames Yes, but then I was still in 3-slice mode, it was in the beginning.
I did use only one slice.
hahaha
00:03
I didn't even know there were different modes.
the only thing i didn't get 100% in 3 slices was number 5
which i got 99%
That's 3 slices.
This is 2 ^.
i did 100% in 5 in 2 slices, but i'm to lazy to repeat it now
Yeah.
how come 5 is 96%
i showed you how to do 100%
didn't i?
00:06
I...have no idea.
I tried everything in 1 slice in 3-slice mode, and I really did my best; then I discovered there were 2- and 1-slice mode, and I slacked off.
here, you said you had done it!
Cerb, i don't trust you anymore, you 3 faced dog
lol
I did it in 3-slice mode, but in two slices, probably.
All the while we were talking, I was in 3-slice mode.
I didn't know there were other modes.
But I was trying to do everything in 1 slice.
ok, I forgive you
Yay!
Now I have a long horizontal stripe that stays on a bit too long. So it would have to be a large solid block?
No. 11.
11?
z-rox?
00:16
Yes.
try "square"
I have tried -- and __.
Ohh I didn't know that was possible too!
but 13 is triangle
yes, it gets worse
much worse
Hmm.
Less fun than the other game.
just think about all the symbols possible in "special characters" of fonts
did you get hallucinations yet?
maybe you didn't play it enough for it to happen
00:18
I...suppose I didn't.
after a while you begin to "see" the figure passing by, instead of a line changing,
at least for some symbols it happens
when it is not very fragmented
The triangle was clear enough.
some people started to post answers as comments in my own answer. what would that be?
should I edit my answer and include them?
00:38
If you feel they are relevant, you could change your answer accordingly.
You can add something like "X added that blah blah...".
it is not an argument, just examples of expressions. Do people pay attention at the comments or they will upvote an answer just in consideration to what is written as answer (excluding the comments)?
That varies.
can you please look at it and give me your opinion?
19
Q: A common phrase that describes something that looks good but is actually not good

austinbvI am looking for common phrases that describe something that appears good but are actually bad. Edit Because people say "bad" is vague I will try to sum up the phrase meaning a little better Something that looks like it will be helpful or advantageous but after use it is hindering. A tool tha...

You could add those expression into your answer, if you mention each author. Or you could just leave it as it is.
00:59
thanks. i guess i'll just leave it that way.
@Tames Sorry, I was away from keyboard.
Well, honestly, I prefer when women don't use nail polish on their nails.
Oh, that's what nail polish is!
Hahah
Learning new words everyday :-)
@OtavioMacedo no problem, I'm glad you are alive!
i thought you were kidding when you said you didn't know what nail polish was, in the sense that men don't mind these things
what did you think nail polish could be?
I don't know... those fake nails or something
Cerberus, see... how words always get some value even if there's no definition given! this is what I mean by word and concept are like two sides of the same paper sheet
@OtavioMacedo interesting!
why do you think you got that idea? can you come up with and explanation?
I just inferred that from context
I knew what "nail" meant
And you asked for a male opinion
So it had to do with female beauty
Elementary, my dear Tames!
01:13
what do you think about fake nails?
i'm intrigued that you thought about fake nails and not the actual "polish", as this involves the same issues
you could have inferred that it was "esmalte"
it is in the same context
But the way you said made it sound like a bold thing
why?
Not something women do all the time
maybe because for me using nail polish is kind of a big issue, as i was never used to doing this all my life. i began painting my nails this year. maybe it is a trivial thing to most woman;
so you thought it was something related to nails, but not as trivial as painting, and thought of something more daring?
@Tames Right, yes.
01:17
Exactly!
:D
/me is happy
But if you had said nail beer, I'm quite sure Otavio wouldn't have been thinking of anything.
Just a meaningless phrase.
To him.
(And to me.)
because both words are already associated with a concept to him. if he had a wild imagination as i do, he could picture a bottle of beer filled with iron nails
this kind of nails lol
@Tames No, don't do that with beer!
;-)
hahaha
01:22
@Tames But is it likely that you would be using that? Context, my dear Watson!
context?
In the present context, it would have been meaningless.
To us.
given that an expression does not have a context, can't you make any sense of it?
you lack imagination Cerb
I mean if you had used it instead of "nail polish" the first time.
You were saying that Otavio had no problem devising a meaning for "nail polish". But that doesn't mean you can always come up with some probable meaning: in many cases, you are just nonplussed.
01:26
As when someone says, "how do you feel about nail beer on a woman?".
@Tames Oh, nice.
See, surrealism only becomes "meaningful" to some extent if you know it is supposed to be like that.
Otherwise, you would think you ha gone insane.
what I meant was, if you don't know what a word means, you will associate it with some concept taking into consideration the context. your example nail beer involves two known words
Cerb, i have a game for you. let me find the link..
I would associate it with beer, and with nails; then I would be unable to proceed and further, and think "unknown/meaningless" and that's it.
if you say "how do you fel about nail aslkdj on a woman?", and X assumes that aslkdj means something, he'll come up with some concept
If he has no idea what slkdj could mean, he will just stare dumb at you and ask "what do you mean?" or "what is aslkdj?".
Because it doesn't have enough meaning for him to analyse it.
if I say "I will not be the first person to succeed in this operation", what do you understand?
no context
01:30
Not much.
Because I have no idea what the operation refers to.
Otavio, why didn't you ask me what nail polish was?
Cerb, suppose this is a test, and you would earn 1k dollars just for saying whatever you think about it
I will think, "she is involved in some operation, but I have no idea what kind". Then I still won't know much.
Because I assumed you were going to show next
it doesn't matter what the operation is
Or at least I could infer from context
01:32
can you remember if you infered automatically? or if you thought "i don't know, i'll find out later"? because you had a concept before looking at the picture
@Tames I could try to come up with possible interpretations. But there would be many, and there would not be one with much greater probability than the others. Unless of course there were more context. If I knew this was some sentence actually uttered by someone in real life, that would be a bit more context, for example. But I do not know that.
Cerb, try to see the important elements in the sentences and find out the ambiguity
if there is one
@Tames I read the sentence, some associations with each word popped up, but no interpretation of the whole popped up that could explain what the operation was.
I had a vague idea, since I knew it was related to nails, some way or another
Hey, are you analyzing me?
Cerb, forget the operation. "X will not be the first person to do Z"
01:34
@Tames The main area where I lack information is context. That includes the kind of operation this is about as the most salient point. And also whether or not this is a sentence that was supposedly uttered in a real situation.
Otavio, no, this is a linguistic investigation
@Tames What about it?
It is pretty vague.
what happen when you face an unkown word
I don't know?
@Tames Hmm that's exactly what you would say if you were trying to sneak into my mind.
01:35
Otavio, now you are becoming paranoid hahah
What do you expect me to say?
Well, gotta go, before becoming a zombie
Hehe
Hehe.
Boa noite!
Otavio, i used some commonplace, as I know it is trivial for women to paint their nails and it is not for me. When you said maybe it is fake nails because I sounded bold, I understood why your option was for fake nails
Boa noite pra vocês!
01:37
boa noite!
Obrigado!
Cerb, someone already did Z before X, or X will not manage to do Z
By the way, by having "meaning", I mean more than just that a sentence calls up some associations.
do you see my point?
You mean that you infer "someone already did Z before X" from that? Yes, that is reasonable.
But...
01:39
and you may infer as well, that no one has done it, and X won't do it either
Uh, on the contrary.
I would infer that someone has done it before, and that x will probably do it too.
if I'm not the first, maybe I'm second or third, or maybe it is an impossible task
You could be second or whatever, but not first. And it is strongly implied that the task is not impossible.
"no one has ever eaten human flesh before, and i'll not be the first to do it"
maybe not impossible, but not desirable
I'll not be the first to paint my nails neon pink, as it is considered ridiculous
"no one has ever broken this rule, and I'll not be the first"
this is called polysemy
@Tames That's cute.
01:47
when I say "big fan", what do you think?
@Tames Sure, that is possible, but unlikely, because the expression is usually not used that way.
Hehe.
lol
Sure, words, phrases, etc. can have several meanings. But what about it?
01:48
if an expression is not contextualized, you can explore all possibilities. it is not like "no context no meaning", it is more like "no context, many possible meanings"
no definite meaning, though
That's what I meant.
no, you said, without context the expression is meaningless
If you feel that there is no possible meaning that has more than, say, a 50 % of being the intended or intersubjectively preferred meaning, then it has no definite meaning. In short, I would call it "meaningless".
"Meaningless" is my short way of saying all that you just explored, hehe.
two possible meanings is very different from meaningless, to me
The word "meaningless", too, can have different meanings.
01:52
the thing is, you can come up with an expression and not contextualize it on purpose to explore the concrete linguistic properties of it
abstract it. that is what Aristotle did with logic, when he reduces thinks to symbols
like, if every A is B, and every B is C, then, every A is definitely C
If you ask a question like, "are there more metal fans in Europe or in America?", and you don't have either meaning in mind (you just say the words), is it a meaningful question?
And suppose that you meant exactly one of the two possibilities, but I, as the reader, did not know which: would it then be a meaningful question for me? In any case not meaningful enough to answer it or say much about it, except if I gave *two* different answers, thereby going through *all* the possible meanings.
probably you would think of a single meaning right away. people hardly notice the holes in communication
@Tames There's still much more context there. It makes sense when I read it. I don't feel as though I were looking at a forest of possible meanings, many of which as of yet invisible to me.
@Tames That is also a possibility.
But the more abstract it gets, and the less context...
it is what usually happens, people assume they know what you are talking about
they even assume they know what you think and feel beyond what you say
In many cases, yes. But not in all.
01:56
then "he hates me, because he looked at me like that"
Which is why people ask, "what do you mean exactly?".
yes, of course
but not always. when you assume you know a person well, you do that less and less
And no clear probable meaning emerged from the "beautify beauty" thing for me.
@Tames Yes, because you have more context.
somethings never come to a confrontation, they are kept on the subjective side and never questioned
when it does happen to come up, sometimes people are very surprised and their universe changes
sometimes one person is telling the other "i love you", and the other is thinking "she wants to destroy me", for some reason
it is very hard to make someone change his/her mind sometimes, because he/she thinks he/she already has the definite code
psychoanalysis deals with this
sometimes people don't even listen to what you say, and you may repeat it and the person ignores it. maybe you don't even know the person actually didn't listen/understand. because we are always making assumptions about the other person
Yes.
02:02
sometimes, any communication just seems impossible
it's like talking to the walls
Uhuh.
it is much like different languages, in some sense
for one person "love-> heaven" of other "love -> hell"
-> indicates the value
so the signifier is the same, but the value is different
Sure.
But don't you agree that in some cases, when you have a vague sentence, it just isn't worth it to explore the countless possible meanings, if none seem very probable?
@Tames Nice.
We just shouldn't be so focused on the exact form and shape of words and phrases.
02:08
it depends on why are you doing that. i like to explore all the gaps in language, it is part of what i study
Do you like to explore the possibilities in a case like "beautify beauty"?
all possible ambiguities in sound and writing and meaning of sentences
I may be inclined to explore so many vague possibilities if the reward is significant.
So if I have some good reason to want to understand what the author means.
this is a different case, it has a logical problem. "metal fan" does not
I'm still not sure what you mean by "logical problem".
02:10
colorless green
square circle
dark sound
etc
one thing denies the other. the thing with beautify beauty is that it is probably not a contradiction.. or maybe it is a form of it
after I read Aristotle maybe I'll be able to give you a better argumentation
maybe for you this is the most boring question of all times?
lol
it was nice of you to comment the question, considering how meaningless you find it
@Tames Ehh not exactly boring, but rather...fruitless.
how poetic, St, you are being gentle
lol
And asking "why can't you apply a property to the general concept of that property?" seems to me like asking "why can't a circle be square?": it is by definition that it cannot be so; it is part of the Kantian framework of our thinking, a synthetic proposition a priori, if you will (though I'm not a huge fan of those terms specifically).
Yes...but please delete that.
02:26
ok
Thanks.
I know it's easy enough to find.
sorry, i'm a very curious person
No, that's OK.
but people don't know your name, at least you didn't put it in your profile
I'd just rather not have it here in chat, because the transcripts are indexed by Google for all eternity.
02:27
oh
No, but it is easy enough to find through my profile.
i didn't know that.
Everything you say here will be used against you!
sh*t
That, too.
02:29
i'm going to hell anyway
Why?
Not that it's not nice down here.
look
this is me
i guess this is fair
bad picture
but they all are
can i delete it now
Aww cute.
Yup I saw it.
You have two minutes to delete a line, btw.
thanks
After that, you would have to ask a moderator to delete it.
02:33
oh, i didn't know
it is an important information
nods
@Tames Why hell?
i guess i have too many dark thoughts. i'm feeling a little better lately, but the last 18 months of my life have been very dark. i don't consider myself a bad person, i think hell is more related to the suffering
all these meanings that i look for in words, i'm still trying to find some for my own
Hmm...why these dark thoughts? And why the past 18 months?
and when i quit doing it,
i went into a terrible depression,
i have been oscilating since,
for some periods there's not a single day that i don't think about death
Oh, that sucks. I guess it's good that you stopped.
02:40
then, i get better and forget about it for 1 or 2 months
I presume you are seeing a therapist when you are depressed?
but it's been like this ever since
Strange.
i began seeing an analyst, because i was going crazy
And has it helped?
02:41
i began seeing her 1 month ago
Ah OK.
it is helping, yes, but there's not a quick solution to it,
Have you seen a regular psychiatrist before?
@Tames Good.
i've seen some, but they didn't help much (some years ago). i've always been a sad person, since i was a kid
Hmm OK.
I can't diagnose and cure you over the internet, hehe.
02:43
i think i may be psychotic, as psychoanalysis sees it... i see the holes where people see certainty
In what way?
it is hard to fill them, because utimately, there's no "big truth" behind things, it is something personal, made up. i find it hard to stick to things, because it is like seeing that everything is an illusion
like ambiguities... where people see 1 meaning, i see many possible meanings. where people see communication, i see misunderstanding
I agree that everything is an illusion, but if you accept that it doesn't need to bother you a whole lot every day.
@Tames Are the two mutually exclusive?
it is a social problem actually, a lack of identification, i need stability, i never had this in my life. always changing
Hmm I see.
And you have no social stability now?
The same people in your life?
02:47
maybe for most people, meaninglesness is the "alternative" vision, and they have another one to stick to. meaninglesness is my main vision, i need to find the alternative
kind of. one year ago i was studying something completely different from what i am now. i was doing research on chronobiology. then i switched to psychoanalysis, which is a completely different field
every time a major change happens, i lose my whole structure
it is like having to built up again from scratch, everytime
i have had some stability at least in study, for some months now. but i keep on thinking about what will I be doing in 2 years or 3, if i'll have to move town for post grad etc
i'd like to stay in the same city for the rest of my life. but i know life is not like that
change is part of it
i need to define priorities
3 or three years is a long time from now.
And you may be able to postpone the move by that time.
yes, but i need to be thinking about it. i'm almost 30 and i don't have a job
You can stay in the same city if you really want to.
@Tames Same here.
We'll be all right!
hahah
Worrying all the time is no fun.
02:52
certainly not
But anyway, do you have people around you, like friends and family?
family no... friends.. hard to tell. i guess i have some colleagues, but i spend most part of my time on my own. i live by myself.
usually, social encounters are related to study groups
which is very good, but maybe not enough
one thing i'm certain of is that studying is very important to me. reading, writing, discussing.. maybe i'll become a teacher
Studying and teaching sound like a very good idea.
but in a certain way it ends up isolating me, because i end up talking only about this kind of stuff
But perhaps doing a bit more social stuff now and then would also be a good idea. Preferably with people who have the same interests. You have probably discussed this with your therapist?
@Tames Why is that isolating?
02:57
maybe people think i'm kind of cold. i thought for a long time that maybe i have some autistic disorder
because the conversation hardly reaches a personal level, this is where people create bonds
even with my parents it is like this
yes, it is a matter that i have to talk about further with my analyst, i'v mentioned it already..
You can be close to people without explicitly touching on personal subjects.
i have some clues on what is behind it, but knowing is not enough to change
It comes with time.
i don't know,
But opportunity is also really important.

« first day (279 days earlier)      last day (4534 days later) »