Thought that steady eager in defending views, it seems that one of yours (Aussie Dhammadatu, Doodoot, Element) got silent on the places he used to hold a stand.
Maybe good householder think it's worthy to care about each other behind of consume.
@AndreiVolkov It's a fine question for chat, to ask or answer. But (for example to keep spammers away) you need an account with "20" reputation (so maybe not if you refuse to use a registered user account) -- the Help says, "We can't allow anonymous participation on chat, so we require a small bit of parent site reputation to ensure that chat is reserved for active, engaged members of the community."
I think it's fine to ask personal questions on chat: "How are you?" etc. It can also be used to discuss Buddhism, or this site, or topics on this site. But the "chat room" on this site is hardly ever been used -- it doesn't seem to have enough regular users to have any kind of conversation going over time.
Take care on each other, for what beyond good deeds could be you refuge. What one gives that he/she's capable to receive. So why seeking refuge in hostility on and on, seek 'right'?
Since DD generated 37,521 good kamma points, DD was cared about. The obviously degeneracy of this site from its intent as an "Experts Site" to a "Papanca Site" shows posters in the expert class of DD are sorely missed. Obviously, the current low quality of this site shows something is going seriously amiss here. When a top poster is suspended for 3 months for asking good questions about Abhidhamma, it shows this site has degenerated into Political Correctness.
Should we take it as DD having declared an explicit intent to continue stirring arguments and creating controversy here, at least wrt to Abhidharma? @dhammadhatu you know how in Buddha's Sangha they wouldn't forgive a member unless he admitted his fault?
Apart from the Sangha's rules, there are Stack Exchange's -- this matches all five of the list-items in the "Disruptive Behaviour" section of this post (which goes on to say, "... these problem behaviours have to be dealt with").
so what explicit rules on this forum allow a main question as the one made? thanks. surely this question should be deleted because on DD is able to give a truthful answer to it.
Andrea. There as no Abhidhamma when the Buddha was alive. You comment is illogical. Regardless, there was no fault. The questions were all valid questions. I will now take my leave of this forum; for the moderators here to continue its degeneracy.
@Dhammadhatu "so what explicit rules on this forum allow a main question as the one made?" -- It's not allowed as a question on the main site, which is why the question was closed; but it could be OK in chat. How are you doing?
@Dhammadhatu And as for that other topic, i.e. if you do want to discuss or ask about why your account was suspended, do you want a different (i.e. a private) chat room for that? Because moderators can summarize but are told to avoid detailing in public the reasons for a time-out.
Discussion on question by user22123: …
Discussion on question by user22123: …