@NicolasRaoul Unfortunately I can't see the history of the GS Richcopy 360 post so I am relying on my memory and browser history. I did visit the GS Richcopy 360 website and I'm sure I noticed that it wasn't free software but it was relatively cheap and the question didn't specify gratis. My history doesn't show that I reviewed the answer either. If I warmly recommended such a software that would certainly be out of character for me. Do you have any way of telling me how I warmly recommended it?

@NicolasRaoul If I did something wrong I definitely want to learn from it. By nature I am sceptical of the claims of any software that I have not tried myself and I am an rsync user myself and have never tried GS Richcopy 360 and don't intend to try it either. This answer is an example of my work: askubuntu.com/questions/986779/…

Reviewing the Metasmoke page shows that clearly Richcopy is spam. There's no argument about that.

@NicolasRaoul Results of further research follows. I found my review on "answered Dec 12 at 14:30 by Baretto James" to the question: Windows rsync command line My review reviewed on Dec 12 at 16:47 was "not an answer" and it was disputed, however the disputed answer was deleted anyway, so my review was CORRECT! I still don't recall recommending this spam product.

There's another answer to the same question that was posted by jack reacher that I reviewed as "not answer" on Dec 3 and my review was found to be "helpful" and that answer was also deleted. It looks OK on paper. Could I have linked one duplicate answer to another as I often do for the purpose of proving that it's a duplicate answer therefore not an answer? If so I didn't think that I was in any way recommending the product.