@Koyovis could you please help me understand how this answers the question?

aviation.stackexchange.com/review/low-quality-posts/49294

@PerlDuck sidenote: network-wide suspension come only from those above mods. mods don't have the power to issue network-wide suspensions.

@Federico The question: "Under what conditions would a helicopter be allowed to fly at low altitude over populated areas?". The answer: "...Major cities in the U.S. are, I believe, mapped by helos so that helos with the same gear can detect anomalies in background radiation levels in case there is a nuclear weapon/dirty bomb/piece of radioactive material missing." That looks like a situation where a helicopter would be flying at low altitudes over populated areas . Which bit is unclear?

From meta.stackexchange.com/questions/141851/…

@PerlDuck I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that user knows exactly why they were banned.

@Koyovis it is not a comprehensive nor direct answer. as a minimum, editing is required

@Federico That's your opinion. I repeat the bit I quoted from Meta: "If you see no problems that would warrant editing or deleting..." The "you" in that sentence is me, Koyovis. But whatever man, be that way.

@Koyovis it's not only my opinion. don't worry. I have asked the opinion of the other mods.

@Koyovis low quality on something like SO is somewhat subjective. In programming there are a bunch of ways to achieve anything, so answers which are not necessarily wrong (perhaps just sub-optimal) get to stay. Here on aviation it's a bit different. We want good quality, preferably referenced, answers. Those ones which are just a sentence with a half-answer should be deleted.

@Jamiec Low quality remains subjective on this site as well, which is my point. You cite a clear case, which the one linked to by Federico is not.