« first day (1029 days earlier)      last day (3052 days later) » 

 
14 hours later…
14:39
in this question, aeroalias included a link to tdpri.com in his answer.
in that link, the author mentions the term "shoulderdecker" or "shoulder decker" numerous times. What the heck is he referring to?
Other than that confusion, a nifty little read
it allows for a level deck as the the nose-up for prop clearance is no longer needed
@FreeMan DC-5: It was the first airliner to combine shoulder wings and tricycle landing gear, a configuration that is still common in turboprop airliners and military transport aircraft
@Shalvenay this question is for you :D
15:07
@ymb1 - thank you sir. I guess I was caught on the "deck" part of that and was thinking that the deck (pax floor) was at shoulder height. I did read the portion about the DC-5, so I was also thinking that it might be an odd reference to a tricycle gear layout as opposed to tail dragger.
Based on that image of a DC-5, it's hard to tell that it's a shoulder wing instead of a high-wing. Plus, my knowledge is still limited enough that I didn't realize there was a crucial difference.
@FreeMan it's a poor term to use IMO, shoulder decker
nonetheless, good read as you said
like the B-24 that had the wing moved up and landing gear changed to tricycle config
@FreeMan a high wing is usually above the fuselage, being flush with the top or a little bit under would qualify as shoulder wing per wikipedia
On a large aircraft, there is little practical difference between a shoulder wing and a high wing
I gathered that. Unfortunately, from the angle of the picture of the DC-5 shown, it's impossible to see where the wing is attached. Now that I know what I'm looking for, it does appear to be below the top of the curve of the fuselage, but not knowing the difference when I started into the article, that didn't register then.
@ymb1 How large is "large"? :)
15:22
no idea, I guess the old wake turbulence categorization can be used
it's a broad term
i guess if the shoulder wing is high enough, it's not wrong to think of it as a high wing, is what the author meant
this is definitely a high wing
above fuselage top
 
4 hours later…
19:19
I am trying to cite the Part 135 regulation for something and I can't find the most recent date of publication. Does anyone know of it?
@SMSvonderTann You mean 14 CFR 135? The eCFR site tells you on every page when the content is current. Right now it's current as of 7 Oct, for example. But I'm not sure if that's what you mean?
@Pondlife I am looking for the "official date of publication" not "currency" Writing citations tend to be picky.
@SMSvonderTann Ah, OK. I don't know, but it could be a good question for academia.SE, I guess they're the experts on formal citations round here :-)
19:40
@Pondlife Ok, thanks!
 
2 hours later…
21:23
What's with the student pilot crashing the plane intentionally because he was "being forced to become a pilot?"
21:49
@SMSvonderTann on @Pondlife link's it says e-CFR data is current as of October 7, 2016
you can use retrieval date
@SMSvonderTann :O for publication date try this
22:14
@TomMcW that's really weird, good thing the CFI made it out alive
@ymb1 Crazy. Makes me think hard about whether I really want to be CFI
it's a freak accident
 
2 hours later…
23:49
@TomMcW that's a WTFy thing man

« first day (1029 days earlier)      last day (3052 days later) »