"Finding the Fun in Making—Not Playing—A Game" article by Melissa Brinks for Sidequest. Melissa Brinks explores the unexpected joy of making a game through playtesting and developing her cousin's homemade game.
I love that El Vividor clears conditions by giving other characters opportunities to indulge their secret passions.
Oh gosh, La Usurpadora is brilliant, you get to play as somebody who's replaced an existing character and nobody notices unless you tell them.
La Venganza looks like a lot of fun to play. Every session you choose someone to get revenge on and roll to get hold on your plan to do it. When you run out of hold, you get bonuses to act desperately or flee.
Given the treasure tables and advice in the Dungeon Master's Guide and Xanathar's Guide to Everything, characters have an implied wealth per level. An approximation of this is shown below, copied from this thread on D&D Beyond.
In converting a number of modules from BECMI/OD&D to 5e I've noticed ...
A Green Hag (MM p177) has an innate spell casting ability including the spell "Vicious Mockery". Its description states
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must s...
@Mods, I have a deleted answer of my own on rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/192877/… . Is there a way to permanently delete it? I don't see the point of being reminded of my own stupidity every time I view that question. (FWIW, "Not an answer" applies as close reason)
Recently we had a question that uses a gif to describe what happens when a caster acts.
The gif was made from an excerpt from Dragonball, and I don't see how it is fair use. In fact, none of the fair use factors but one is in the favor of the commenter:
The purpose and character of the use, inc...
Eh, don't think so. Nothing offensive or anything (Shouldn't be, it's my own writings). Just misread the question, and therefore the answer is a bit of a non-sequitur. (I blame lack of coffee)
@Gloweye Redacting information out of a post (making it visible only to SE staff going forward) exists but is limited to sensitive information--generally when someone has posted personally identifying information, inadvertently or not. This meta.SE post says basically the same, and is a distillation of some more verbose guidance given to us by SE in mod-tool documentation.
@Gloweye I've got handful of those in my wake, where I've written up some seems-to-me erudite answer, read the next answer that comes along, thought "well, that's not much like my answer at all," and realized I'd misread the question or read something onto it... <facepalm>
@AncientSwordRage Several of my games were originally written to fit on an A4 zine-fold. They ballooned a little, but forcing myself to adhere to the first draft that size really helped focus on what was necessary, and make sure my indulgent additions were the ones that really made me happy.
@BESW I've been trying to practice drafting (partly in response to watching some Brandon Sanderson lectures) as well as something I guess I'd have to call ramping up? Practice pieces?
Something Sanderson said tripped him up was that he'd write a draft for a novel, then have to revise it and feel like it'd be easier to start over - I've had that feeling, and it put me off writing drafts to being with
That and some advice from John Green when he wrote Zombiecorns:
> "I'm increasingly convinced that while no great book can be written in a month, no great book can be written in a first draft no matter how long it takes you to write it." – John Green
The ramping thing is rather than trying to run before I could crawl, I'm trying to really hard visualise the steps to get to the last stage, which is hard cos of executive dysfunction... planning is hard and off putting
@BESW as a child I literally cried when we were told we would visit a nature park for school, the reason being is that I had been several times before and I couldn't stomach the boredom I imagined I'd face
so yeah I've long had an issue with reworking stuff
Like, there's making the sketch of the scene before you paint the picture... and then there's just drawing your sandwich on a napkin.
I think that with writing it's especially hard to get into the mode of practice, draft, revision, etc., because as audiences we don't see it as much, the way we can look at da Vinci's notebooks and Picasso's one-liners.
We tend to see the finished piece with all the work invisibly smoothed over already.
I'm treating this Pocket Places jam project as an opportunity to goof off.
> The Original Orrery: The Desk Planetarium of Sir St James Notorious inventor, astrologer, and radicalist Sir St James of Milton-on-Wheat (c. 1425-1770*) is credited with improving the orrery designs of Giovanni Dondi dell'Orologio and inventing the field of astrohagiography in the process. Sir St James clockwork prognostications are sadly overshadowed by the partisan rumors which accumulated around Sir St John after his disappearance, but the Desk Planetarium was nonethless coveted by collectors for centuries. Like its creator the device eventually vanished from record; this time in the T…
Occasional poke-a-mod reminder: elected moderators can remove a question from the Hot Network Questions list. If ever you see something hit the HNQ which you feel isn't a good representation of the site, feel free to poke a mod (either in chat or via a flag).
I wrote the following question: Can Ride be used to Push a mount/animal companion? containing multiple questions. I was asked to separate them out, so I did. Once I separated out the question When pushing an animal, how long will it perform the trick it doesn't know?, the separate question was an...
@AncientSwordRage better: Sir St John's full name was Sir John St John, and he was the second son of a man also named Sir John St John, making him technically Sir John St John Jr and his father technically Sir John St John Sr.
He had several kids and his second son was also named Sir John St John, so it goes all the way down another level.
What is a historical lock?
A historical lock is a mechanism by which moderators can mark posts as historical artifacts. Questions which are historically locked feature the following post notice:
Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historica...
"The post does not meet the current guidelines for a good, on-topic question, and The post is stellar, in spite of its off-topic nature, and There are a large number of views, upvotes and inbound links on the post, and"
Today I learned that the optical telegraph was actually a thing and not just something PTerry made up as a fantasy analog to the Internet. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_telegraph
@Glazius Ships and u-boats up to the 1960s ran light signalling crews regularity and flag alphabet signaling with directions is still a navy tradition.
Question: is asking to be provided explicit quotes on an answer that tells repeatedly "I think" "I believe" and never points to sources bad conduct?
@Trish I don't think so, as long as the request is presented politely. (Not every answer needs quotes to prove that it's right, but the answerer should be able to support that what they're saying is correct.)
I pointed to explicit lack of sourcing and pointed out how it could provide sourcing to back up the claims. What do I get back? I am called to wage a personal war
Why do I have the feeling that I am a magnet for being bashed this week?!
Yesterday, I got bashed on over a misunderstanding based on incomplete information sets and bad wording. Today, I am called to wage a personal war because I want to improve the stack?!
Here is the text for "Push an animal" for the Handle Animal skill:
To push an animal means to get it to perform a task or trick that it doesn’t know but is physically capable of performing. This category also covers making an animal perform a forced march or forcing it to hustle for more than 1 ...
@ThomasMarkov What about my comments that point out a substantial problem with the one answer - which by the way is the very type of answer that is my concern, because it is all "theory" and "guessing intentions of X" is that?!
@V2Blast which in that case... they are not - would the Citation box help?
@Trish Now that I've looked at it... If you feel that it's a serious enough issue to act on, and the other party won't hear you (both of which I think are the case here), that seems like it's time to flag down a mod. It could just be that they're not open to pushing the issue in comments
Stack Exchange is about questions with objective, factual answers. We’ve been crystal clear about this for as long as I can remember, even back to the earliest, pre-beta days of Stack Overflow. It’s right there in the standard Stack Exchange FAQ: What kind of questions should I not ask here? Avoid asking questions that are…
@Ben I prefer the ferrous-metal Warforged bard in the shape of a young female, and the other warforged bard from refined ferrous metal and carbon alloy that has not engaged in prurient activity.
the most common ferrous metal is iron and steel is an alloy of iron and carbon. A person not engaging in any prurient activity is a virgin. And a young female is a maiden. So Iron Maiden and Virgin Steel
@Trish A question and a comment: Do you know of any ferrous metals other than iron (genuine curiosity thinking I'm missing something)? And steel is used for basically any iron based alloy
@Someone_Evil I am stumped too actually, but... TWI Global lists it together with Pig Iron... I guess that the list actually is meant to be alloying stuff....
So it sometimes gets 'grandfathered' into lists of materials that were originally ferrous, and the profession just makes it an honorary ferrous material instead of revising their categories.
Also, to clarify a possible point of confusion (for future ref), I would've said that metals refers to the pure (metal) elements, and alloys to mixes of them, or deliberate mixes of them. Which made me stumble a bit on the metals are alloys statement
@Trish Maybe just me, but get a bit of a edgy-teenager vibe off that...