« first day (2391 days earlier)      last day (2575 days later) » 

11:00 PM
@Miniman Everyone just wants the hats.
 
@SevenSidedDie Well that changes everything.
Just incidentally, what are the SE rules on negative campaigns? Asking for a friend.
 
@Miniman I'd be happy to see you nominate.
 
@Miniman I assume a negative campaign is when elected moderators agitate to be removed from office?
 
@doppelgreener Thanks! I think I will, but it's nice that I don't feel like I have to.
@BESW Nah, that's an anti-campaign.
 
No, an anti-campaign explodes when it comes into contact with a regular campaign.
 
11:05 PM
Oooh, serious question: If you nominate, can you still vote?
 
@Miniman You should do it--after all, you're famous!
 
3 mins ago, by Miniman
@doppelgreener Thanks! I think I will, but it's nice that I don't feel like I have to.
:)
 
@Miniman IIRC, yes.
 
@BESW What is this, a campaign for ants?
 
No, that'd be an Ant-Man campaign. Or possibly an Antz campaign.
 
11:14 PM
@Miniman In terms of campaigning against a candidate? I don't think there are, so long as it stays within the bounds of Be Nice, and doesn't devolve into repetition that would attract standard mod intervention. So basically, respectful is good, regardless of content.
 
I decree that the moderator election campaign be determined by each nominee running an actual campaign.
4
 
@Papayaman1000 Published or homebrew?
 
But now I'm thinking about what system I'd use for an Animorphs campaign.
 
@SevenSidedDie That was supposed to be a joke, sorry. (About how I'll go to any lengths to win now that I know there are hats at stake.)
 
@SevenSidedDie Either, but the choice will be noted and taken into account during scoring.
 
11:17 PM
@SevenSidedDie Yes. The primaries are determined by Tomb of Horrors, and the final decision is made via their own story.
 
@Papayaman1000 I've got dibs on RfS.
 
@Miniman Ah, I got *woosh*ed. ^^;
 
@SevenSidedDie Ah, found it. They can still vote, but not for themselves. Which suits me perfectly. [evil grin]
 
@Miniman That sounds about right!
 
Today in "up your players' vocabulary": don't call them murderhoboes, ask if they wish to proceed so burglariously.
 
11:21 PM
@nitsua60 Today in "up your buddies' vocabulary": don't call them murderhoboes, call them murderhobos.
 
@Papayaman1000 I had a college course where we did something like that.
 
@DuckTapeAl I'm curious.
 
@Papayaman1000 Murderhobos really don't like being misspelled.
 
@Papayaman1000 If they were snakes, would they be Murderhoboas?
 
@Papayaman1000 If they're all bards though, you can call them murderoboes.
 
11:22 PM
@DuckTapeAl What if they were all archers? Murderhobowmen?
 
If there's infighting do things come to murderhoblows?
2
 
What if they pushed a hardline Communist agenda? Would they be Murderhobolsheviks?
[Today in Up Your Players' History]
 
Me and the rest of my homicidal party are really close. We're murderhobros.
 
Let me just star all of these puns...
 
@A_S00 I was about to say something...
 
11:26 PM
Actually, let's not go crazy with the stars....
 
What if they were all stoners, packing a murderhobowl?
 
Noted, sorry.
 
May 10 '16 at 21:56, by BESW
Try to star only one or two representative lines from a conversation, please.
 
^ The star button is not a 'like' button.
 
@doppelgreener Now that is important enough to the conversation to garner a star.
 
11:27 PM
@A_S00 Thanks for taking that on board.
 
It's full of murderhostars
 
@SevenSidedDie Ok, that one was forced.
 
@SevenSidedDie People who host murders?
 
@Papayaman1000 I think we hit a peak somewhere and it's all murderhodownhill from here.
 
If they're all birds, they're probably murdercrowbos.
 
11:28 PM
@SevenSidedDie Stop
 
Possibly with some local maxima to interrupt the descent. Murderhodescent.
 
@SevenSidedDie How murderhodroll of you.
See? That was a terrible pun!
 
@Papayaman1000 Ooh, good one.
 
And not even in the good way!
These are what you're making!
 
11:30 PM
3.x question -- is a 5' step a move or a free action?
 
Also I have an absurdist's sense of humour.
 
Free.
 
Neither.
It's not any kind of action.
 
I would hope it isn't a free action.
"I take a 5' step forward, for drama."
"Okay, then--"
"And another."
"Wait hold o--"
"And another."
"Stop"
"Another."
 
@Papayaman1000 I believe the word you're looking for is "stahp".
 
11:32 PM
Yeah, I was thinking “neither”. To the Mainsite Mobile?
 
@Miniman Celebrities who host murders.
 
@BESW Nice.
@SevenSidedDie Good idea!
 
@nitsua60 Only when I'm being ironic.
[tips fedora]
 
@Miniman Incorrect! It's actually a Miscellaneous Action, apparently. So we're both wrong. :P
 
@DuckTapeAl o.O
 
11:33 PM
But, more to the point, a 5-foot step doesn't take your move action for the round like it does in 4e.
p144, PHB.
 
The nature of the five-foot step changed at least twice over the life of 3.x, as I recall.
 
You could say that about basically any mechanic in 3.5, I think. :P
 
also, Spell-like abilities don't provoke an AoO unless specified otherwise, correct?
 
Last I checked, yes.
 
they provoke unless otherwise noted
 
11:36 PM
Beat me to it.
Supernaturals don't, spell-likes do.
Because spell-likes works pretty much exactly like spells.
 
yeah
 
except for components, because why not
except for warlock invocations, which have somatic components, like spells but unlike all other SLAs
just 3.5 things
 
Ah, right. [face/palm]
3.whydidithinkthiswasanelegantsystem
 
I think 3.5 is many things, but "elegant" is not one of them
 
I spent four or five years beguiled by its empty promises.
 
11:40 PM
3.x is about as inelegant as a RPG system gets
 
More than anything else, it reminds me of Hex, the computer that Ponder Stibbons and company made in Discworld
 
I'd say GURPS is probably more elegantly designed as a system haha
 
@Shalvenay If a bit script-y.
 
What were those guys called who poured boiling oil through openings into hallways inside castles?
@SevenSidedDie
 
better than being a giant mishmash of exceptions that'd make lawyers and judges IRL weep and gnash their teeth
 
11:42 PM
@NautArch Jerks.
 
@NautArch If there's a technical name for them, I haven't learned it. Now I'm curious.
 
(I'm sure there's an exception to "specific beats general" lurking somewhere in the 3.x house of horrors)
 
@SevenSidedDie murderholers?
2
 
(never mind hiding WotC occasionally stuffing elephants into mouseholes)
 
Seriously though I'm pretty sure they were just defenders. Job specialisation probably wasn't a thing in the middle of a siege.
 
11:43 PM
"Roll for Wisdom."
[fails]
"You lash out at the player, his fedora drifting in the breeze."
 
Sorry, just a bad murderhobo pun
 
@BESW That's my impulse too. Although, the role may have had a specific name. “Joe McHistoryface, you're an arbalequisterior today.”
 
Matacánista?
...I don't know how to conjugate French for bretèche or brattice or mâchicoulis.
However, Wikipedia notes an Anglo-Latin verb machicollāre.
 
But I do agree that it was likely just a guy. And probably lower in the hierarchy. Also, is "lower on the totem pole" offensive nm
 
From which I might extrapolate a modern equivalent being something like neck-breaker, skull-crusher, etc.
Also from Wikipedia:
> Because the places protected by bretèches were usually vital, they were usually manned by professional soldiers, often mercenaries in the Middle Ages.
 
11:52 PM
it's strange to think in a way, but most of the profesionals were mercenaries, because the bulk of many armies were levied
which means peasants
whose main jobs were farming and such
plus of course, quite likely high turnover rate in an army, I would think
 
@BESW well apparently my brain is clearly not working this evening. Good thing I still have work to do.
 
And that's my research break. Back to finishing up these taxes.
 
@NautArch sometimes turning our brains off is a half decent way not to go crazy at work XD
@BESW oh joy
 
@NautArch I found myself using the phrase out loud the other day, and kinda recoiled on hearing it, despite it coming from me. Without doing more research into existing discussion around it I'm not sure, but my sense on my own is that I'm probably going to avoid the idiom.
 
@trogdor I accidentally put my ETP on the 1040 GIITR instead of the 1040-SS. Need to print new forms and re-calculate everything.
 
11:57 PM
@BESW oh noes!
 
@SevenSidedDie @NautArch I think it possibly depends on if a totem pole actually recognizes a hierarchy or not. if it does the phrase might not be too offensive,... maybe
@BESW sheesh, I just want to point out for the record, taxes are too stupidly complicated, we really need to do something about that
and I can't say I know exactly what can be done, but it's a hassle just to get taxes done, let alone the fact that they also mean the government is literally taking your money XD
 
@trogdor If we lived in a regular state, I'd have a much easier time of this. It's translating my tax software into Guam tax law that always messes me up.
 
@SevenSidedDie Express chefs. Fast food chefs, depending on your kingdom's position on cannibalism.
 

« first day (2391 days earlier)      last day (2575 days later) »