There's another custom 3d-printed miniatures Kickstarter here: kck.st/1AvoIsB
(HeroForge is now up & running, too. Not as flexible as their sales pitch made it sound, but pretty good. Not sure I want to spend $25 on a single mini, though)
@Kaz_king: speaking to the linked blog post -- one thing I did for a 5e oneshot is set up a scenario where the party was keeping tabs on a skirmish force outside their means to engage directly, only to find that skirmish force #1 was marching to fight another band of skirmishers from a rival faction, set up at a bridge/village "chokepoint" area
(the party decided to watch the carnage then strike, which made life a bit more confusing, but worked out for them in the end)
@Kaz_king: so you really do want to think about building your encounters around more complex tactical and strategic pictures than your average dungeon crawl or random orc warband
Eh, I think you're projecting. At its heart it's the same "wait, does this rule really work this way" from the moonbeam - if it's a GM saying "my player tried this" vs a player saying "hey I want to try this does it work" what's the diff? "Goodness or evilness of motivation" isn't a SE criteria IIRC. We're lawful neutral.
Like Robin Hood.
(that's an unrelated snark on every alignment debate ever)
I don't know, it doesn't really seem to be asking if it works. It could be edited as such and would be a passable question in my book if it were really seeking input, but the title doesn't seem like it's actually asking for input on the functionality of the tactic. It feels more like a rhetorical question.
Somewhat of a related question to Why Are Our 5e Questions Terrible? - questions from people who haven't read the book yet, and want us to do it for them.
This is a little different from the discussion in Should a question be judged on its level of "expertise"? because these questions don't even...
Kinda, but worse than homework. It's not even "I allegedly read the book but I calculate AC how?" or even "I am just really dumb and how do you add 4 to something" but "I don't own the book and haven't read it. Tell me what it says in there."
Here's my answer, "pay WotC their $25 like everyone else"
the caution on those, especially with whatever the current edition of D&D is, is that some of those are simply new players who haven't learned the "how to read an RPG manual" skill, and that's more of the problem than the specific mechanic they're working on at that moment
Right, and I try to make a differentiation between those and "I do not own it" or "I have not read it." Read it and clueless - fine, but that's the table stakes.
This doesn't actually look perfectly like the image I recall -- but it's sure as heck closer than anything else! It's entirely possible that the memory is corrupted. (Also, this isn't the sea witch but the cauldron steam turning into terrible shapes.)
the question is possibly salvageable -- I rather like RS Conley's answer, and had the question been written in a way that encouraged that answer I'd have likely upvoted it -- but as-is it's pretty obviously an attempt to avoid buying the book. The user's behavior in response has also been... unpleasant
On the other hand, though, the question also could have been quite valid in a "I'm considering buying this book, and trying to decide if it's worthwhile to me. One thing I feel like I could really use is some guidance on handing out non-combat XP; how well is that topic covered in the book?" seems like a really valid, useful question
and I'm also really not a fan of judging a question based on "why it's being asked," especially when the judgment is really based on "why we think it's being asked"
@Miniman right, but why a question is being asked is not nearly as important as whether or not the underlying question is good
like, if the underlying question is good, the correct response is to edit the question to improve it, and then answer it (without copyvio issues, ideally)
but if it is not, then the best response is to just to downvote it to oblivion and leave it unanswered
Urrrrrgh. Spent days on this project, was five minutes from completion when I discovered that it was totally unusable because of a hidden setting in some of the client's original content that I'd used as a jumping-off point for the whole thing.
What is a good way to represent Strength Through Ruthless Application of Knowledge, in the context of the power a group can bring to bear on a physical conflict?
Well. For Fate an idea I immediately had is a stunt that gives you +3 instead of +2 when you invoke a pre-existing character or scene aspect (not yours).
The relephant player logged in and is talking to me a bit about the cult (his PC was a member several decades ago), so maybe I can narrow down some themes.
The primary purpose of this cult is to provide his PC with interesting temptations and manipulations.
I have a general question that might not be worth making a thread about. Does anyone have a better way to grid a whiteboard? I'm using permanent marker at the moment but it just gets erased along with the sharpie and it's a pain in the butt to constantly re-rule the lines.
I had a local copy shop laminate the grid which came with the D&D 3.5 DMG, and it's lasted me seven years of weekly use including traveling halfway across the world multiple times.
I though about using masking tape initially, but once you've gone over with a marker it doesn't rub off, so it's hard to define the borders you're trying to draw
Sigils then that are thought to mean something. Tarot cards are just a sort of random number generator, where the numbers are the cards and the randomness comes from shuffling them and choosing randomly, and then the results you get are supposed to be interpreted as meaning something. So, random number generator.
Also, the best random number generators actually run off environmental sources: the static electricity generated by an unused USB port, for instance, is often a pretty good random number generator source. So that would draw the random generation from the world!
@doppelgreener You're thinking of Tarot too objectively, I think. In the context of the occult, it's not a random number generator: it's a channel for guiding the expression of an individual's mystic energies.
You don't get random cards when you lay out the Tarot: you get exactly the right cards to answer your question.
i have done tarots exactly once in the context of having a glimpse of the future, i have never heard of this guiding mystic energies thing. would you care to explain?
The exact details vary wildly depending on the tradition you're looking at, but the basic idea is rooted in the notion that the world works like a story: certain kinds of current events exist because they foreshadow future events. The future event causes the present one.
Within the context of this belief in the nature of time (that future events reach back to cause present ones), there are certain circumstances in which it can be known that an event is a foreshadowing. If the individual and the ritual is attuned properly, one can "force" the controlled randomness of the Tarot--or the bones, and so forth--to become affected by the future event you wish to gain knowledge of.
(Alternately, every event of a certain type is a foreshadow--like the tea leaves left in the bottom of a cup--but only certain people are able, through training and/or insight, to correctly understand the nature of the future event which influences them.)
In either case, the supposedly random set of limited outcomes of an action--like drawing cards from a deck--is no longer truly random, and just as you can know where an object fell in the water by examining the ripples, you can examine the cards to know something about the event(s) which influence them.
This is the foundation of most beliefs in divinations, omens, prophecies, and so forth, though it's rarely articulated quiet so baldly as "the world is a story and we can understand it in terms of narrative devices."
Hrm. In the last case you're looking for a chaotic event that only certain people can 'correctly interpret', such as the junk memory left over after a program is closed and/or the bits scrambled. (Background: every program stores information in RAM, and reserves its section of RAM. When the program closes, those variables are still there, but the space is freed up. Another program can read those same variables if it has the same addresses and understands how to read them.)
that thematically is pretty much the same as the leaves left at the bottom of a teacup.
In Live and Let Die, the villain has a fortune teller who reads the Tarot to give him advance warning about his enemies and provide insight to make his plans.
also, i'm coming from a perspective where tarot and other precognisance rituals were borne of seeing patterns in the universe's chaos and making meaning out of them, sometimes problematically vague enough we could eventually match them to things that happened and say "the cards were right! it took ten years, but they were right!"
I'm thinking of a sibyl in the game as a way to give an enemy great power--but also an obvious hook for the players to remove one of the enemy's advantages and perhaps turn it in their own favour.
my thinking is: if you want a digital equivalent, everything comes down to numbers. upon them you may lay any meaning you like: 01000001 can mean 65 in base 2, which can mean capital A on the standard ASCII table, or can mean an instruction to delete a section of the hard drive in machine language. they would know this, but they would also know you can lay meaning on those numbers.
digitally, the equivalent of the tarot cards would be: pick, say, 32 sections of memory, generate random numbers in them, then choose eight sections to look at. Interpret the contents.
(powers of 2 like 32 and 8 are, of course, nice round numbers.)
(compared to a number like 10. that's 1010 in binary! Yuck!)
alternately: listen to a network port that's just receiving noise. interpret its meaning.
(Skin Horse has an AI defined by feeding the contents of all emails sent by all employees of an international corporation through a complex set of algorithms.)
I appreciate the sentiment and enjoy a lot of the music, but the biggest impact the holiday season has on my everyday life is that for all of December I'm afraid to drive on the roads.
@BESW - Read the Amber series by Zelazny, and Nova. I was thinking that there was a hard scifi by Stephenson that featured tarot simulacra but I can't find it.
Also, you can go along the lines of "The word gives meaning to the event". If you are waiting for something you happen, you can be awaiting, anticipating, dreading, fearing, etc. Each different way of saying the same thing gives a different outcome.
I forget the name, but one of the original Star Trek books featured them weaving a new universe with a...Hamalki? physicist, where their words and thoughts literally shaped the universe around them.
Use the tarot to paint the possibilities, and they way they describe it gives the flavor and structure.
Found it: "The Wounded Sky" by Diane Duane. (And I must say, every single one of Diane's books I've found to be outstanding.)
@BESW Idea: open and closed bits in a disk represent the long or short lines of I-ching runes. The randomizer that generates them is propmpted with written questions, MUD-style.
Basically the character jacks into a data line and tries to interpret what's coming over the wire, except the flow rate is so high that they are essentially reading random morsels of data as it passes them.
I have just seen someone complaining that the multi-media, multi-ending semi-interactive Star Wars amusement ride in Disney studios in Florida doesn't fit with @!#$^$%^ canon.
A really core data link seems like it would be like that, with the advantage of it being in a particular place.
Massive flood of information, but also more opportunity for something interesting.
It also opens the possibility to actually direct the power, by choosing where to tap. For instance, a low-traffic line might be more intelligible, but would have less interesting revelations.
If you've read Anathem, I'm also kind of riffing off that universe's internet, which ends up dominated by junk information created by spambots, with a counterforce trying to extract the small amount of correct, useful information.
Divination's generally rooted in the idea that we need something more than human --or at least different-- for guidance, or we wouldn't need magic to figure out what to do.
And this cult in particular is a technopocalypse cult.
Today's gift from research: "Moscow Institute of Reanimatology."
You're welcome.
The Black Knight satellite is an alleged object orbiting Earth in near-polar orbit that ufologists and others believe is approximately 13,000 years old and of extraterrestrial origin.
== Stories ==
Authors claim that there is a connection between long delayed echos and reports that Nikola Tesla picked up a repeating radio signal in 1899 which he believed was coming from space. The satellite explanation originated in 1954 when newspapers including the St. Louis Post Dispatch and the San Francisco Examiner ran stories attributed to retired naval aviation major and UFO researcher Donald Keyhoe saying...
Because a) human stuff is more interesting than alien stuff, and b) I'm already running a 2012 apocalypse plot with an unidentified space object that might be a doomsday trigger.
In that case, there are all kinds of artifacts ufologists claim are actually spaceships, or bits of text or art that were supposed to be references to such things. In ufology, everything is UFOs.
I want to answer this question with a challenge to the frame by suggesting cthulhu-dark, but I can't figure out how to because I don't know BRP/CoC well enough.