« first day (3297 days earlier)      last day (1724 days later) » 
02:00 - 11:0011:00 - 00:00

11:00 AM
Also, if it's relevant, I was following the steps outlined here: fosslinux.com/10212/…
 
Those instructions look okayish
At a very limited glance
I'd do a test of the drive tho
As in try to do a full format, write to 100% and verify, and keep an eye on SMART
 
@rahuldottech I've done that with 2 USB drives before, so it should work
 
@bertieb I'mma switch to Windows for the testing. Be back in a bit.
 
@rahuldottech Hang on
 
@JourneymanGeek sigh
 
11:03 AM
Other potential option is the USB dealie crapped out
 
@bertieb hm?
 
Not sure how you have it hooked up
but I've had flaky USB hubs in the past too
Albeit long and cheaply ago
 
@bertieb I can try bypassing the USB hub. Although it's a pretty expensive one so I'd hope that it doesn't have issues
Anyway, I'll try without the hub once
 
@rahuldottech Test the drive first
 
11:04 AM
I'd say
 
totally skip the hub
 
@bertieb FWIW, I'm also booted into live Ubuntu through the same hub
 
keep things as simple as possible
 
Ok, skipping hub
 
Agree ^^
 
11:12 AM
Ok I'm not goin to read that entire backlog
but it seems we have a Users vs Stopping Problem.
Stopping Problem is NP hard.
in fact, I think it's impossible. A process cannot judge for itself if another process is crashed, or merely taking a long time.
In computability theory, the halting problem is the problem of determining, from a description of an arbitrary computer program and an input, whether the program will finish running (i.e., halt) or continue to run forever. Alan Turing proved in 1936 that a general algorithm to solve the halting problem for all possible program-input pairs cannot exist. A key part of the proof was a mathematical definition of a computer and program, which became known as a Turing machine; the halting problem is undecidable over Turing machines. Turing's proof is one of the first cases of decision problems to be...
So you say 'Show me a list of the 8 tasks, tell me when each one is complete'
Fine, except task 4 takes 6 hours, while the rest take 10 minutes each
you get to task 4
your computer is showing 'busy on task 4'
5 hours later, it's still showing 'busy on task 4'
you think it's crashed. It hasn't.
 
So... just like trying to guess when a toilet will be empty when you badly gotta go? ;p
 
lol
maaaaaaybe?
 
@djsmiley2k Can't task 4 be further broken down into smaller steps, or at least something on which you can get some kind of meaningful progress?
 
how far would you like to break it down?
'written 100340340360430730402023 bytes of 210210420543064383092843042804832048230482084208420842'
 
Enough such that the user can get meaningful updates without it getting silly :P
 
11:16 AM
:)
Figure that out, and you'll fix 99% of the UI problems of todays computers.
What's meaningful? My mum just wants to know it's working.
My dad wants to know it's writing bytes to the disk
 
Even if that's slapping a label that says "Step 4 usually takes around 5 hours- wait for 6 and then <do x>" on the indicator
 
@bertieb But you've just tried it on a 1950's computer!
 
Well see, this is where the conversation diverges
And all sortsa wild things get thrown in
 
On the average system at the average load, for the average dataset it takes a average time....
 
Which I'm all for, incidentally
In an ideal world there's a way to configure displayed verbosity on-the-fly in a way that is intuitive
 
11:18 AM
Lets go to a real world example
@rahuldottech's usb stick
he could hopefully (if ubuntu exposes it) find the process/log that's running
he could run a debugger against it to see what it's doing
 
and lower-level tasks are given a means (callback, IPC, log file, whatever) to communicate to the higher level (user)
 
but formatting a disk takes.... time, depending on size of disk
size of disk isn't known, until it's known.
 
for more fun
for a spinning rust disk - speed can depend on where it is
on any disk, it could be cache dependant as well
 
Size is known before you finish the format process though, except in cases where the disk lies (counterfeits), tho right?
 
Do SDcards/USB keys actually report size
 
11:21 AM
@djsmiley2k yup
 
i mean, upon query, at the start of the process?
ok
So it should really display X of Y Mb written, maybe
 
@bertieb so for some reason my live Ubuntu won't boot anymore
 
lsblk would expose that?
 
@rahuldottech Erk
 
11:21 AM
s/Mb/Tb/Zb as appropriate
 
Separate media to install drive I take it?
 
lsblk gives you the UUID, i didn't think it did the size?
 
Pb then Zb
I think it did size
 
@bertieb yeah
 
@JourneymanGeek I figured you could just have a few 100000s of Tb for that :P
 
11:22 AM
I'll check in a bit
 
@rahuldottech Will it boot if you disconnect the drive to which you are trying to install?
in case of boot prio weirdness
 
> tim@vbox ~ $ sudo blkid
/dev/sda1: PARTLABEL="grub" PARTUUID="016eed92-5974-44e2-a678-5878d1d734c7"
/dev/sda2: UUID="D33E-AE92" TYPE="vfat" PARTLABEL="boot" PARTUUID="665ec9b6-110d-43a5-a92a-78a7eff7aba2"
/dev/sda3: UUID="62877869-94f2-46d3-a371-752cb8cb91aa" TYPE="swap" PARTLABEL="swap" PARTUUID="ee6e0ada-1bf0-42aa-96cb-225b605ebf53"
/dev/sda4: UUID="a521ad6c-800e-4667-b460-e744bb518374" TYPE="ext4" PARTLABEL="rootfs" PARTUUID="6198781a-784e-474a-b936-10df1a903ae2"
 
@bertieb it "boots" all right, but then ubuntu is stuck on the loading screen
The one with the dots
 
ie its trying to boot from the thing it tried to install to, which doesn't have a working install
OH GOD THE DOTS ARE BACK
:D
 
> -S, --size <size> overwrite device size
overwrite it? wut.
 
11:23 AM
I actually don't know what part of the boot process that is
 
@bertieb OH UBUNTU WHY U SO CLEVER.
 
But you can probably disable that and get it to tell you what it's actually doing
 
hit escape?
try another VT?
 
@rahuldottech ctrl+alt+2....7 give you anything?
 
add nosplash, remove quiet or similar
Or those options ^^
 
11:24 AM
NAME   MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
loop0    7:0    0  88.5M  1 loop /snap/core/7270
loop1    7:1    0   8.4M  1 loop /snap/canonical-livepatch/77
loop2    7:2    0   8.4M  1 loop /snap/canonical-livepatch/81
loop4    7:4    0  88.7M  1 loop /snap/core/7396
sda      8:0    0 119.2G  0 disk
├─sda1   8:1    0   512M  0 part /boot/efi
└─sda2   8:2    0 118.8G  0 part /
sdb      8:16   0 931.5G  0 disk
└─sdb1   8:17   0 931.5G  0 part /mnt/1TB
@djsmiley2k different command
 
@JourneymanGeek that doesn't look like lsblk....
df -h?
 
I gotta go now, I'll get back to this in... five hours or so
 
mdadm -s?
 
why is everything here so complicated tho :(
 
@rahuldottech it's not
you're just not used to it.
 
11:25 AM
Turns out diagnosing faults is tricky
 
Ask @bwDraco how complicated driving was at first.
 
@djsmiley2k It definitely is. Compared to Windows.
 
He's not here :-\
 
@bertieb ._.
totally
cough improperly installed non contacting heatsink...
 
@rahuldottech If the medium's borked, Windows will crap out too
 
11:26 AM
you ran blkid
different command
 
@JourneymanGeek How did you manage to inhale an improperly installed heatsink?! Good thing you coughed it up!
;-P
(at least I amuse myself)
 
@bertieb lol
the heat sink wasn't even touching the processor ._.
yet it was securely attached.
 
@JourneymanGeek 0_o
Erf
I imagine it wasn't sinking a lot of heat
Not being in contact
 
@bertieb chkdsk found no errors
 
@bertieb processor hit 102c
 
11:28 AM
@rahuldottech Not quite the same thing, but then again I dunno how thorough chkdsk is
@JourneymanGeek Toasty
@JourneymanGeek If you drank tea you could boil some water with that!
Though you'd need something to conduct the heat to the water vessel
 
I considered a waterblock...
 
If only there was something that conducted heat from one place to another 🤔
 
which is actually pretty nice
 
Certainly looks the part
 
since I forgot and thought this was a lga 775 ....
well it has a plastic backplate, which was a definite selling point...
._.
 
11:35 AM
 
Oh Randall, you cheeky scamp
 
C:\Windows\system32>chkdsk /r /f g:
The type of the file system is exFAT.
Volume Serial Number is A6C2-AB65
Windows is verifying files and folders...
Windows is verifying file allocations...
File and folder verification is complete.
Windows is verifying free space...
  472858 free clusters processed.
Free space verification is complete.

Windows has scanned the file system and found no problems.
No further action is required.

  60526592 KB total disk space.
       256 KB in 2 files.
       256 KB in 2 indexes.
@bertieb ^
It checks each sector, so I think I'm fine here
 
I'd still write to the whole drive, verify, and check SMART afterwards
Or just retry without the hub if you're feeling ballsy
In all honesty, I'd probably do the latter in reality
Then if it failed, check the medium carefully
 
@bertieb you know how I'm feeling? exhausted
 
But in general I'd put my money on a medium crapping out ahead of ext4 driver / installer randomly messing up
@rahuldottech Yea, getting things set up can be frustrating
Whether OS, furniture, house, job, etc
Something you don't do often is hard to troubleshoot
Something made the IO fail tho
Across a few logical blocks too
Yeah actually
Looking closer at the log
The Kingston dropped off the radar
OS saw it as being disconnected and reattached
My money is on either the hub or the drive being screwy
Or something overheated
Or somesuch
But yeah, the drive dropping off while being written to probably didn't do file consistency much good
 
11:54 AM
yah
would also explain 'this storage is really slow yo!' warnings
 
nod
 
run badblocks on that badboy
 
Ah yes
That's the badger
 
 
1 hour later…
Bob
1:06 PM
@rahuldottech /var/log/
most probably /var/log/syslog
@rahuldottech hubs, expensive or not, tend to not like extended transfer
they overheat and reset
(or sometimes stall until you manually reset them)
/me has been running various UASP SSDs off various hubs for years
also external HDDs - similar issue
I've learned to chunk my transfers
 
 
1 hour later…
2:22 PM
@Bob why 8?
@Bob iirc OS9 on macs used to say "About X minutes left..."
 
 
2 hours later…
Bob
4:04 PM
@Burgi it can say it but there's no way to be certain
cc @bertieb
 
Wow, I can't believe I never heard of that movie!
 
 
1 hour later…
5:19 PM
@bertieb Does your Q802 tend to heat up quite a bit even when idle?
 
@Bob stupid cc bertieb, huh, well.. I resemble that remark!
@rahuldottech I haven't noticed that, but then I rarely touch it
Or the Q802
ba-dum tiss
 
No but seriously
I set it an leave it
So I have no idea
 
Specifically, I'm talking about the bit to the left of the 2-track RCAs
@bertieb do you leave it on 24*7?
 
@rahuldottech Yes
Actually, I think I noticed that the wall-wart/transformer dealie was warm
Lemme check
 
5:23 PM
@bertieb Huh. I want to do that, but dunno if that's good for the components.
 
Hmm, the Q802 is warmish
Dunno
I don't recall the manual saying anywhere specifically not to
 
@bertieb me neither
 
 
3 hours later…
8:24 PM
So THATS where all your powers gone :D
 
 
3 hours later…
11:11 PM
@Bob welp thats a movie...
 
02:00 - 11:0011:00 - 00:00

« first day (3297 days earlier)      last day (1724 days later) »