@noitsbecky yes but even with that more correct and less colloquial definition of molex connector, it's still true that a SATA connector is not a molex connector. So what i'm saying is still true regardless of whether one uses the colloquial definition of molex connector, or a stricter one, or one that rubbishes the term but uses the term.
That said the main reason I was needing 3 ports was because two were taken by things that should have run off the internal wireless card except for the fact that it's shit. Thankfully I've upgrsded/replaced it now
Intel is one of the few companies that actually gives a shit about drivers
@Rahul2001 eh... you're not the target market. Adobe doesn't cater to beginners. And they shouldn't have to. They make software that's useful for professionals who need the functionality you call "complicated" and "bloated" - it's their job.
Part of it is also legacy, of course... when you have many thousands of users familiar with your program, changing things up to make it 'simpler' can be detrimental.
@noitsbecky Yea, that was a bad run. Think they've fixed it by now though :\
The above statement was comparing 3xxx with Broadcom/Dell drivers with horrible handle leaks, and comparing Intel display drivers with AMD/Nvidia (on Linux)
And Ralink is still on my shit-list for drivers that prevented Win8.1 install and would also insta-crash if installed on 8.1. With no updates either, of course.
(...that's another point in Intel's favour, they actually update their drivers)
Actually, I wonder how Ralink stuffed their drivers up so they only worked on 8. There's not all that much difference between the two, especially in NDIS...
I think the 6xxx series was an odd one because only one card had integrated Bluetooth (and now they all do)
I had the 6300 3-stream non-bluetooth one and it was fine. Apart from the usual Intel drivers lying to Windows about signal strength, the drivers were fine
Also I don't get the point of Intel making the single stream card to begin with... It has two antenna connectors so it already has 90% of the hardware of a 2-stream card and you're saving nothing on antennas or RF components
Probably just artificially crippled/product segmentation...
The quality of an audio codec is determined by how close its output is to the original source. The quality can only ever be as good as the source.
FLAC is a lossless codec which means its output is an absolutely perfect, 100% identical copy of the original. It produces 100% perfect quality and i...
High definition FLAC has better sound quality than ordinary FLAC. It has approximately the same sound quality as an audio CD. An ordinary FLAC file sounds sufficiently different from an audio CD that I can hear the difference and distinguish between a FLAC file and an audio CD only by listening t...
This has reached the definition of opinion based
Also sounds like snake oil
> An ordinary FLAC file sounds sufficiently different from an audio CD that I can hear the difference and distinguish between a FLAC file and an audio CD only by listening to it, however a high definition FLAC file sounds just like an audio CD to me. There is no difference in the encoding of high definition FLAC and ordinary FLAC files, the only difference is that high definition FLAC files have have a sample rate that is more than four times higher than ordinary FLAC files.
@Bob yep, Verizon Wireless... I'm using PopData again for $3 for an hour because I'm near my unlimited-limited cap on my Jetpack.
previously, the top speed I'd ever gotten on either my iPhone 7 Plus or the Verizon Jetpack AC791L (which have comparable LTE capabilities, AFAIK) was 4.5 or 4.6 MB/s (capital B)
and both the iPhone and the Jetpack had been virtually neck and neck in terms of the speed record for each
but now suddenly the iPhone is delivering almost 100 Mbps speeds at that 10.8 MB/s peak
easily sustaining in the 7 to 9 MB/s range right now; even 7 Mbps sustained is way higher than I got with my previous PopData session -- there I was peaking around 4 Mbps and sitting sustained in the 1.9 MB/s to 2.8 MB/s range, roughly
should be able to download this entire 18 GB game plus some other pending Steam patches I've been holding back due to being careful about my data usage
I'm sure the TLA's already have your our facebook accounts anyways ...
Now they want the passwords as well.
> "We want to get on their social media, with passwords: What do you do, what do you say?" Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly told the House Homeland Security Committee on Tuesday, according to NBC News. "If they don't want to cooperate then you don't come in."
> Kelly, speaking before Congress to address Trump's immigration ban, said the password request was an idea the Department of Homeland Security was considering. Another, he said, was seeking visitors' financial records.
So if your original copy is lossless. you only get the artifacts from one generation of conversion, which is why Flac makes sense as a archive format for personal use.
IMHO, this answer should get neither an upvote nor a downvote. It is chatty and wanders off topic. On the other hand, a lot of effort has gone into it. — Fleet Command1 hour ago
._.
Clearly, this person has never seen me talk about a topic I'm interested in ;p
@noitsbecky could have -- the latest release of flagship smartphones (esp. Samsung and Apple) and usually the latest Jetpack hotspot (Verizon-branded devices made by various manufacturers such as Netgear, rotating kinda like Google used to do with Nexus) are about 1-2 years ahead of Verizon's actual LTE deployment
so somewhere during a flagship device's lifecycle, assuming you buy it early after it comes out, you get a "free" speed upgrade when they deploy more spectrum or more MIMO or more whatever it is now that makes it faster
the tower has probably supported those great speeds (up to nearly 100 Mbps peak) for a couple months, but I've never actually started a download, on a device supporting all the latest bands and tech, during a time when the tower was so un-saturated that it could spare that much bandwidth to one person
those are some pretty extraordinary conditions to reach true peak throughput, and usually the "tower being unsaturated enough" is the one that I guess would hold me back
as the tower gets more saturated, each user gets successively capped at a lower speed... usually during prime time I can realistically expect 20 Mbps
The trend towards cheaper SSDs has been a very disturbing one. First it's TLC NAND with poor sustained write performance, now it's DRAMless designs with poor random write performance and low endurance (due to the need to maintain the mapping tables in NAND).
I'd prefer a Samsung SSD any day of the week. Plextor is a close second.
> The fact that some of these products couldn't even complete an industry standard performance test tells us all we need to know.
Ouch.
More than anything else, "SSD" in an entry-level system is just a marketing line.
> At Computex last June, one SSD vendor told us about an OEM 2D TLC SSD that will burn through the rated endurance in a little over a year. The SSD has to last a year because of the notebook's one-year warranty, but anything beyond a year's worth of use is up to the user to fix. Tactics like that are the driving forces behind putting cheap DRAMless SSDs in $500 notebooks.
This is what really irks me about the PC industry. The cost pressure is so extreme that every last penny counts.
@bwDraco agreed - I've seen lots of people say "but I have an SSD!" then throw out some random crap brand like the early Sandisk SSDs or Kingston (ugh, the kings of low quality) etc. and I just laugh
one of my work laptops has (part of the OEM config, not custom) an enterprise-renamed Samsung 840 Pro, then I have a smattering of 850 EVO and 850 Pros in personal boxen, and IIRC the Macbook Pro uses Samsung V-NAND based parts too (but NVMe, not SATA)
I have an 850 PRO in my laptop and an 850 EVO in an enclosure for external storage. There's also an old 64GB Plextor M5M in my laptop as scratch space.